House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • Her favourite word was children.

Last in Parliament November 2005, as Liberal MP for Hamilton Mountain (Ontario)

Won her last election, in 2004, with 35% of the vote.

Statements in the House

International Conference On Dyslexia October 1st, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the first International Conference on Dyslexia is taking place in Hull on October 7, 8 and 9. Dyslexia is one of the most common disabilities in the world. Approximately 23% of the Canadian population is affected and has difficulty reading and writing.

For these Canadians dyslexia presents an enormous struggle. Reading the paper, making a grocery list or reading a bedtime story can be the cause of great frustration. We need to dispel myths and promote facts regarding dyslexia. Dyslexia can occur at any level of intellectual ability. It can be alleviated by specialist teaching and committed learning.

It is an honour for Canada to host the first International Conference on Dyslexia. This conference will help to dispel some of the myths about dyslexia, as well as offer some guidance to those affected and their family. I am sure all members will join me in wishing the participants of this conference well.

Canada Customs And Revenue Agency Act October 1st, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I know the hon. gentleman has worked a long time with special interest groups on taxation. He may have a limited view of what Canadians are expecting.

There is a lot of flexibility within the agency. We have not seen it yet because it is not there yet.

The hon. member does not seem to be against the general principles of the agency: better service, fairness, accountability, partnership with the provinces and better management of our resources. Since he is not against the principles of it, I hope that he will come to committee. A lot of consultation has been going on across Canada. This does not mean there are not some little points here or there that do not need to be corrected. It is at the committee that we will correct these points.

I hope that the hon. member will be at the committee to help us get the bill through so it can become operational and the taxpayers will have the advantage of the flexibility and good services that will be provided under the agency.

Canada Customs And Revenue Agency Act October 1st, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I think the minister already answered that question today. He mentioned that in a number of provinces we were collecting over 50% of their taxes and that in some provinces we are collecting 80%. This practice is already being used by some provinces.

I think it would be logical to wait until the agency is an agency. Then I think we would see the different areas that want good service in collecting their taxes will be coming to the federal government and asking us to collect their taxes for them.

Canada Customs And Revenue Agency Act October 1st, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. critic of the official opposition. I have a lot of respect for this member. Although he is one of the youngest members we have in the House, he is an acknowledged expert on tax. However he is not the only expert on tax. There are many other experts on tax who agree with the agency.

It is interesting the question the member asked me has to do with other departments and not to do with revenue. I am not sure if that means he has no criticism of the agency and is suggesting that I talk about other departments.

I would like to make more comments about the bill. This morning when the hon. critic of the official opposition was speaking, he suggested, I think somewhat sarcastically, that the minister had taken several years to put the bill together and to get it before the House today.

This suggests that maybe the member does not think we should be consulting Canadians. That several years was time that we took talking to individual Canadian taxpayers. We talked to particular groups concerned about taxation, whether it was accountants or tax collectors, et cetera. We talked to the provinces about how they felt about it. Some of them are using the services right now.

I cannot imagine it, but if the Reform Party were to be in power I am sure it would not just draft a bill, put it out there and never consult with Canadians. This is why we needed the two years.

The bill has changed a lot in the last two years. It is because we listened. The minister has listened. We have changed the set-up of the bill. This is where we are now more accountable. The minister will now be accountable to all Canadians. All members of parliament will still be able to bring their problems to the minister.

Canada Customs And Revenue Agency Act October 1st, 1998

Mr. Speaker, this is my first speech since being named parliamentary secretary to the Minister of National Revenue and it is a pleasure to speak on an issue so fundamental to improving service and fairness for Canadian taxpayers.

It is a pleasure to speak on a bill which seeks to uphold Canadian values while meeting the realities and opportunities of the modern era.

We live in a world of major economic and technological change. We live in a world where citizens rightly expect more creativity, accountability and efficiency from their governments.

In this world, businesses and individuals must constantly strive to find new ways to make even good things better and so must governments.

That is the real reason behind the creation of the Canada customs and revenue agency. We want to preserve the traditions of the past but we also want to develop an innovative environment that will allow us to be the best for many years to come.

Taxation, customs and the administration of trade policies represent complex areas dependent upon a great many people who do many things and do them well.

We are going to improve how we do things, even the things we already do well.

As the minister indicated so clearly in his speech, this bill is about fairness. It is about partnerships. It is about accountability. It is about saving money for taxpayers and is about modernizing our approach to meet the expectations and aspirations of Canadians.

The Minister of National Revenue will be responsible for the agency to parliament. He will continue to be responsible for administering and enforcing program legislation such as the Income Tax Act and the Customs Act. The minister will have the authority to inquire into issues raised by members of parliament on behalf of our constituents.

The minister outlined before this House the structure and duties of the board of management. Having private sector people nominated by the provinces and territories will change the system for the better. It will guarantee even more opportunities for federal-provincial co-operation. That is what Canadians expect from governments. That is what Canadians expect from elected officials.

The true measure of success for the new agency will be in its operations. We want, as the minister said, an organization with a state of mind that is state of the art. The real change will be in our approach to doing business and our approach to serving Canadians and providing them with tax and trade administration services that are second to none.

The agency we are proposing is built upon the guiding principles of service and fairness. Canadians have told us what they want. They want to deal with a more client oriented tax and customs administration. They want more personal contact and less passing the buck. They want consistent answers. They want to deal with an organization that is flexible, one that can accommodate a range of human situations.

Canadians want us to make their lives a lot simpler, from bulletins issued in plain language to business hours dealing with modern realities of working families. Agency status will allow us to improve service to Canadians by affording more flexibility in the way we manage resources.

Our generation is one that often embraces technology as a panacea for any operational challenge. In truth, technology has been a great partner in improving the way Revenue Canada does business. From electronic filing, to virtual customs approvals, to Canpass, the pre-approved pass for frequent travellers, we have used technology to improve service and to reduce costs. For every technological change though, there are far more important and real human values and principles at work.

The most important of these principles and values are trust and honesty. It is also important that complete and transparent information be provided to those we serve.

Those values and principles require that we show fairness in application and of course they require that we show consistency, accuracy and efficiency in every single transaction.

The bottom line is that human resources in the new agency will determine whether it will be leading edge and world class or just another shuffle of organizational charts. That is why we have made the management of human resources a central focus for modernization and progress.

The minister has consulted widely with Revenue Canada's employees. Since April 1997 over 10,000 of them have been actively involved in telling him how to create a new human resources framework. These hardworking public servants are decent taxpaying citizens like the rest of us. They have stressed the need for human resources management based upon values and principles, not complex rules and processes. They see the importance of simplicity and flexibility. And they want their own worth to be recognized, appreciated and respected.

It is no surprise that what our employees want, values, principles, simplicity, flexibility, recognition and respect, are what all Canadians want. Acting on these human expectations will be the true breakthrough for the new agency.

The bill before us proposes that the bulk of the human resources management functions be assumed by the board of management of the new agency. Under the legislation before the House today it will be the board of management of the agency that approves the negotiating mandates and collective bargaining agreements with unions, not the federal Treasury Board. It is the agency that will negotiate directly with its unions.

Why should the agency not negotiate with its unions? Employees will be able to tell their representatives what they want, what they think is good for them, their futures and their careers. By negotiating face to face with employee representatives, the agency's managers will hear firsthand the wishes and concerns of their people. They will be able to act firsthand on those wishes and concerns.

It is also the board of management that will establish agency staffing procedures, not the Public Service Commission. The agency will have the flexibility to design a staffing system that directly meets the needs and rightful expectations of taxpayers and the needs and rightful expectations of the employees. This is a vital advance. A simple example will show why.

As many in the House will appreciate, the employment market for computer systems and data management expertise is highly competitive. Currently it takes Revenue Canada between six and 12 months to complete a staffing action and make an offer of employment. Under the agency it will be possible to develop new staffing systems as well as a classification system and salary rates that can compete with the private sector for the professionals we need.

I will point out something else that is very important. Revenue Canada will not be privatized. The agency will continue to be an integral part of the Government of Canada's responsibilities. Employees will continue as public servants. The agency will be accountable to parliament for how it treats its overall responsibility to employees.

Five human resources design teams made up of managers, employees and union participants have completed their work on the details of important areas of the people part of the new agency: staffing and classification, recourse, training and development and employment equity. Each of these important issues is on the table for discussion. It is still too early to report to the House on what is essentially a work in progress.

However, as a result of the work of the design teams, I can tell you what Revenue Canada employees want. They want a staffing system with fewer rules. They want a gender neutral classification system. They want fewer occupational groups and levels. They want the human resource system and the work environment to encourage diversity and reflect the Canadian public they serve. They want greater emphasis placed on transferable skills and past performance. They want a simple, quick and fair system of recourse.

The agency structure that we propose will allow us to accommodate these demands. We have to co-ordinate and simplify our human resources processes so that the right person is in the right place at the right time. That is not only a matter of staffing. It is also a matter of training and development, of improving the way we work, for example, more flexible hours or flexible places of work, including work at home. It means finding ways to attract people to the jobs that need doing.

I can assure you that all Revenue Canada employees will be offered a job in the agency. They will remain public servants during and after the transition. Collective agreements in force at the time of the start-up of the agency will be carried over until they are renegotiated.

I can assure the House that all Revenue Canada employees will be offered a job in the agency. They will remain public servants during and after the transition.

Because my French is not too good I will repeat that in English because it is very important and a point that has been brought to me quite often by constituents. Agency employees will retain the same access to jobs within the public service that they now enjoy through deployment, appointment and competition.

From a human resources standpoint, the operative word is opportunity. The Canada customs and revenue agency will create a whole new set of opportunities, new types of programs and services, new working relationships and new ways of doing work. All of this means better jobs for current employees, jobs that will be more responsive to what our clients want, jobs with substance, jobs with a future.

This is not an effort to downsize the department. This is not the intention and has never been the intention. Rather, our aim is to provide Canadians with better service, the type of service they should expect from government, the type of service their hard earned tax dollars give them the right to expect.

The public servants who work at Revenue Canada are very practical people. They deal with real life situations every day of their working lives. They know what Canadians want.

They know that Canadians want even more effective and efficient service. They know Canadians want more co-operation among governments. They know Canadians want one-stop shopping. They know Canadians want streamlining of administration. They know that Canadians want tax compliance to be easier and less costly. They know that Canadians expect promptness and fairness.

They know that in an era of logarithmic change, governments must change the way they serve our citizens. They know that the public interest must always come first. They know governments must reduce overlap and duplication. And they know that the new agency will save taxpayers tens of millions of dollars.

The principles of the bill before the House have been endorsed by a lot of associations: the Canadian Importers Association, the Tax Executive Institute, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, the Canadian Society of Customs Brokers, the Alliance of Manufacturers and Exporters, l'Association de planification fiscale et financiére, the Canadian Bar Association, and the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.

Those groups know that the Canada customs and revenue agency can be the vehicle for taking a group of highly skilled, highly motivated people to an even higher level. Those groups know, as our employees know and as all Canadians know, that governments must move to provide better service, fairer service and smarter service to taxpayers.

I urge this House to pass this bill without delay so that all Canadians can benefit from the opportunities and advantages presented by this new agency and the strength of its thousands of hard working employees.

Equalization September 30th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the government's decision to delist MMT responds to a ruling by a panel established under the agreement on internal trade, AIT.

This panel determined that the Manganese-based Fuel Additives Act was inconsistent with the federal government's obligations under the AIT.

In the light of the government's response to the panel's recommendation, the government also moved to resolve Ethyl Corporation's NAFTA claim and Ethyl Canada's challenge in the Ontario court. Ethyl has terminated its legal actions.

Studies in Canada and the United States are proceeding on the impact of MMT on health and the environment. If subsequent federal government action is warranted, it will act using the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

The government's right to regulate in the public interest is not in question. NAFTA is consistent with Canada's sovereign right to regulate in the public interest respecting public health, environment and the safety of Canadians.

In the investor state proposals under discussion in the MAI negotiations, Canada continues to favour open and transparent processes which reflect high standards of procedural fairness compatible with Canada's legal practice.

The government's position is clear. Nothing in the MAI would prevent the government from regulating in the public interest. This includes legislation to protect our environment, our labour standards and our health and social services.

In April, together with other OECD countries, Canada confirmed that the MAI must be consistent with the sovereign responsibility of governments to conduct domestic policies and not inhibit the normal non-discriminatory exercise of regulatory powers by governments.

The Government of Canada will only sign an agreement if it protects and promotes our national interests. This includes our sovereign right to regulate in the context of protecting the health, safety and environment of Canadians.

Equalization September 30th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the public complaints commission was created by parliament in 1986 to act in the public interest in addressing complaints by the public against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

The commission is an independent civilian board. Each year it receives on average 1,000 complaints from Canadians about the RCMP. About 300 of these complaints result annually in independent investigations. The commission has a strong list of members and has carried out its mandate with integrity.

Opposition members of this House have charged that the public complaints commission will not be able to get to the bottom of the issues relating to the APEC summit because its mandate is too narrow.

The terms of reference in this particular hearing show clearly how broad the scope of an inquiry can be. The APEC panel will hear all evidence and will report on “the events that took place during or in conjunction with demonstrations during the APEC conference in Vancouver”.

The chair of the public complaints commission has stated that the panel will follow the evidence where it leads and that the scope of the investigation will be broad.

Any questions regarding the RCMP operations prior to and during the APEC summit are squarely within the scope of this hearing. Continued attacks on the ability of the PCC to investigate properly the APEC summit will undermine the integrity of this body, which I might emphasize has developed a strong reputation over the past 12 years for fairness and thoroughness in its deliberations.

Members should be aware that the government has provided additional funding to assist the commission to hold a very complex hearing in the public interest. This funding will, for example, cover the administrative and witness costs of the APEC hearing. A number of senior federal officials from, for example, the PMO and DFAIT will testify at the hearing.

I also stress that the government has co-operated fully, indeed has gone to great lengths with the commission's council for the release of documents. The government is just as interested as hon. members across the House in seeing a full and complete independent inquiry into security at the APEC summit.

Canadian Centre For Emergency Preparedness June 12th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, on Monday the Canadian Centre for Emergency Preparedness will be hosting its eighth annual world conference on disaster management in Hamilton.

Every year leaders in the field of emergency response examine lessons learned from the past year's worse natural and man-made disasters.

This year's conference features the eastern Ontario and Quebec ice storms, the Alberta fires and the Red River flood.

Emergency Preparedness Canada administers the joint emergency preparedness program and the disaster financial assistance arrangements program on behalf of the federal government.

This Liberal government has given tremendous support to ice storm victims and to those affected by the Alberta fires and the Red River flood victims. This emergency preparedness program is simply another way the Liberal government is helping Canadians in time of need.

Committees Of The House June 10th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the first report of the Standing Committee on Health in accordance with Section 5.(1) of the Tobacco Act and, pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), the proposed seizure, restoration and excise tobacco regulations were referred to the committee as of Wednesday, June 3, 1998. Your committee has considered the proposed regulations and has agreed to approve them without amendment.

Access Awareness Week June 1st, 1998

Mr. Speaker, this week various communities will be celebrating the advances made by Canadians with disabilities in their communities.

Access Awareness Week reminds us that we are working toward a goal to enable people with disabilities to enjoy the full participation in the economic and social life of Canada. It also gives us an occasion to reflect on the work being done and to call on our partners to renew our commitment to Canadians with disabilities so they can create and build opportunities for themselves.

Just recently the Prime Minister received the prestigious Franklin Delano Roosevelt International Disability Award at the UN on behalf of Canadians. This award recognizes our commitment to work with Canadians with disabilities for their full participation in Canadian society.

But as the Prime Minister said, much remains to be done. I urge all members of the House to build on this award and to continue to work to enable Canadians with disabilities to take their full place in the economic life of this country.