Madam Speaker, I think you would find unanimous consent to apply the results of the vote just taken to the third reading stage of the bill.
Lost his last election, in 2004, with 37% of the vote.
Appropriation Act No. 1, 1997-98 March 12th, 1997
Madam Speaker, I think you would find unanimous consent to apply the results of the vote just taken to the third reading stage of the bill.
Appropriation Act No. 1, 1997-98 March 12th, 1997
Madam Speaker, if the House would agree I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House with Liberal members voting yea.
Supply March 12th, 1997
Madam Speaker, I believe there would be a consent to apply the results of the previous vote to the following: the supply bill motion for third reading; concurrence in interim supply for the year ending March 31, 1998 and for the supply bill motion for second reading and reference to committee of the whole.
Supply March 12th, 1997
Madam Speaker, if you were to seek it I believe you would find unanimous consent to apply the vote taken on the previous motion to the motion now before the House.
Supply March 12th, 1997
Madam Speaker, if the House would agree, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting yea.
Supply March 12th, 1997
Madam Speaker, I think that you will find unanimous consent to apply the results of the previous vote on this motion, the Liberal members voting yes.
Supply March 12th, 1997
Madam Speaker, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting yea.
Business Of The House March 12th, 1997
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I believe that you will find consent for the following order. I move:
That any recorded division requested with regard to private members' business M-31 later this day, March 12, 1997, be deferred to the conclusion of Government
Orders on April 7, 1997 and that any recorded division requested with regard to business pursuant to Standing Order 78 on March 13, 1997 be deferred until the conclusion of Government Orders on March 17, 1997.
(Motion agreed to.)
Privilege March 5th, 1997
Mr. Speaker, I was here during that time. Those ads were very different from what appeared in publications yesterday.
In the substance of the ad there is nothing that says the legislation is passed or that it would become effective on a certain date. It does not refer to the result or the consequences of the legislation as the GST ads did.
There is no point even considering the content of these ads compared to the GST ads that caused the ruling by Speaker Fraser, which was a good ruling and one I supported.
In terms of this question of privilege I see nothing in the ads that violates the privilege of any member vis-à-vis the piece of legislation which was before the House yesterday and will be back in the not too distant future.
I simply leave for your consideration, Mr. Speaker, that in comparing the two issues you find there is no question of privilege.
Canada Labour Code March 4th, 1997
Madam Speaker, the motion we will be considering during private members' hour stands in the name of the member for The Battlefords-Meadow Lake. All parties have been consulted and have agreed that we will proceed with private members' hour, although we are passed the hour of seven o'clock.
The agreement encompasses the member for Kamouraska-Rivière-du-Loup who would be given the courtesy, and that was agreed to by the member for The Battlefords-Meadow Lake, that he speak first during private members' hour. That is the agreement we came to. I hope it will stand.