House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was reform.

Last in Parliament May 2004, as Liberal MP for Windsor West (Ontario)

Won his last election, in 2000, with 54% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Parole June 17th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, the hon. member makes an important point in his question.

First, I would like to inform the House it is our intention to propose legislation quite soon that will cover a number of areas in the subject matter he mentioned. It will make it easier for the Parole Board to rule that the correctional service must keep in prison until the end of the terms imposed by the courts those convicted of violent sexual offences against children.

Second, it is a matter of public record that we are proceeding to appoint people of proven merit and competence to the Parole Board.

Third, we intend in legislation to create a process of disciplinary review for Parole Board members.

All these steps, including steps to improve the training of Parole Board members, will help restore public confidence in the Parole Board's operations.

Gun Control June 15th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, the national action plan against smuggling, announced and implemented in February, included action not just against cigarettes but also against drugs and firearms.

The additional efforts of the mounted police and other police forces are targeted against the importation of illegal firearms. This effort is continuing and increasing.

Privilege June 13th, 1994

Point of order, Mr. Speaker.

I make these comments as government House leader with the utmost respect to you and your position. I think if we search the precedents of the House you will find many occasions when members have risen to make a personal statement under the guise of a statement of personal privilege to put on the record their understanding of a situation involving themselves person-

ally where things have been said about them that they do not consider to be accurate.

I respectfully ask you, Mr. Speaker, to follow these precedents and allow the hon. member for Vancouver South to finish his statement before calling on anybody else.

Royal Canadian Mounted Police June 13th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I hope the hon. member will join with me in saying that if anybody is going to obey the rule of law it will be the RCMP and that he will join with me in encouraging that to be the case while we work together to find solutions to the concerns of some members of the force.

Royal Canadian Mounted Police June 13th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, the commissioner and I are aware of the concerns of the members of the RCMP. We are sensitive to them and we are working to find solutions. In the meantime the commissioner designate Mr. Murray has said that members of the RCMP are quite responsible and will carry out their duties in due course. I think we continue to have confidence in the professionalism of the RCMP in British Columbia and throughout Canada.

The Family June 13th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, this requires discussion and debate that we do not have the time for in Question Period.

What about the role of the state in making sure our children have enough food, clothing and education? What about the role of the state in making sure that children in nurseries are not in abusive situations? This matter cannot be sloughed aside the way my hon. friend is attempting to do.

The Family June 13th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, it is not for me to interpret the words of the Prime Minister. They very much speak for themselves and frankly, they sound pretty good to me.

Peacekeepers In Former Yugoslavia June 13th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, the government has not announced any change in the present position of the Canadian peacekeepers. I appreciate very much the hon. member's support for the peacekeeping forces of a strong and united Canada. We appreciate that very much.

Peacekeepers In Former Yugoslavia June 13th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, it would be premature to take any such decision because, as the hon. member implied in his question, there is still time for discussions to be under way and we hope to have a positive outcome.

Business Of The House June 9th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I respond to the request of the opposition House leader to deliver the weekly statement of business that the government intends to call.

First, I wish to thank the House leaders of the parties opposite for their co-operation in sharing information in order to facilitate the business of the House for the rest of the month.

In outlining this business I would caution the House that there may be changes from time to time in order to accommodate members with a view to expediting this business.

I must also point out that much of the agenda depends on the timeliness of bills being reported from committees.

Today the House will continue its consideration of Bill C-34 and Bill C-33, the bills regarding native self-government and land claims in Yukon. We hope that we will be able to complete second reading of these bills today but if we cannot we will fit them in for completion early next week.

Tomorrow we will call Motion No. 13 concerning a committee review of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

On Monday the first item of business will be Bill C-35, the citizenship department reorganization bill.

There are ongoing discussions as to whether we might be able to do this bill at all stages. If we are not able to do so we will merely complete second reading. This will be followed by Bill C-23, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, and Bill C-24 concerning wildlife.

I understand that there may be a disposition if there is time to commence with Bill C-11 regarding tobacco on Monday evening.

In any case this bill will be the first business on Tuesday. It will be followed by Bill C-16 regarding the Sahtu Dene Land Claims and Bill C-36 respecting the Split Lake Manitoba flooding agreement.

We would then begin the report stage of Bill C-22 regarding the Pearson airport.

In order to accommodate the critic for the Official Opposition on this bill who cannot be here on Wednesday, if the other business is moving less quickly than expected during the day we will discuss moving Bill C-22 up in order to get a start on it while he is still here.

On Wednesday we will begin with Bill C-12, the Canada business corporations bill, followed by Bill C-28 regarding student loans, and Bill C-31 concerning Telefilm Canada.

If this is not feasible, after consultation we could return to consideration of Bill C-37, the Young Offenders Act, a bill that I understand will require a considerable amount of debate.

On Thursday we will call Bill C-38 regarding security of marine transportation. It is the intention of the government to make this bill subject to the new Standing Order 73(1); that is, to refer it to committee before second reading.

The remainder of Thursday will be taken up by Bill C-22 and any other spill-over from earlier in the week.

We expect to introduce the lobbyist legislation late next week and to devote Friday to a consideration of a motion pursuant to Standing Order 73(1) to refer that bill to committee before second reading as well.

We are now beginning to use one of the new provisions that we all agreed to when we passed an order to update our standing orders a few months ago shortly after we adopted the throne speech.

In any event, it may be presumptuous to attempt to project into the last week the House will be sitting, the week of June 20, but I can at this time indicate to the House that the government intends to place before it during that week Bills C-32, C-30, C-25 and C-7, as well as a bill implementing miscellaneous statute amendments already reviewed by the justice committee in addition to asking the House to complete any unfinished business from the week before.

If we have time I am sure there is a lot of other work we can do.