Mr. Speaker, all members of Parliament need to take greater ownership regarding the operation of this, the people's House of Commons.
On Tuesday, an important question regarding the deployment of Canadian military resources deserved an answer but, instead, received non sequitur nonsense. It was a sad display.
Question period is the 45 minutes afforded each day for this House to hold the government to account, to ask ministers of the crown about matters of policy important to our constituents. It was never intended to be a forum for the scoring of cheap political points, nor for hurling irrelevant-to-the-question barbs about what political staffers do.
Although your ruling was certainly correct that it is not the duty of the Chair to assure the quality of answers, surely the executive council has an interest in providing information to Canadians rather than buffoonery.
While the Chair was also correct that challenging the impartiality of the Chair brings into question the integrity of how this entire place operates, surely in the minds of the public, this place has already been slipping into disrepute, if not irrelevance, for much too long.
I implore members to represent their constituents in this, the people's House of Commons, and not merely partisan interests. How will Canadians take this place seriously if we, as members, do not take ourselves and this place more seriously?