House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was actually.

Last in Parliament April 2025, as NDP MP for Windsor West (Ontario)

Lost his last election, in 2025, with 28% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Committees of the House October 29th, 2024

Madam Speaker, one thing I am concerned about, though, is that the Conservatives continue to talk about defunding the CBC. I agree with reining in the management, the fees and the bonuses; that should have been done a long time ago under several governments.

However, when we look at Marketplace and Go Public, we see that there are issues with Rogers; Air Canada; Porter, most recently with persons with disabilities; McDonald's and E. coli; landlord tactics using artificial intelligence against consumers; sex trafficking by CEOs from Abercrombie & Fitch and Nygard. There are issues with Honda with regard to the fuel pumps; Elon Musk over Tesla and its issues; Boeing, for example, on public safety; allowing the X platform, formerly Twitter, to use artificial intelligence against people; tobacco giants; emission scandals and car companies. It goes on and on.

We are going to lose significant investigative reporting that protects Canadian consumers when the Conservatives defund the CBC. What are they going to do next?

Telecommunications October 28th, 2024

Mr. Speaker, under the Liberal government, multi-billion dollar companies feel emboldened to use shady tactics to rip off Canadians. After the government rubber-stamped the Rogers takeover of Shaw, they promised lower costs but have snuck in price hikes for Canadians. The Liberals have done nothing to protect people. Instead, they rewarded Rogers with over $165 million in federal money.

Rogers must be put on notice and reverse the cuts or be banned from federal contracts. Will the Liberals have the courage to do it, yes or no?

Petitions October 25th, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to present a petition from about 100 individuals, which has been led by the member for New Westminster—Burnaby, with regard to firefighters and the banning of PFAS chemicals in firefighter gear and firefighting foam.

I also want to recognize Windsor Fire and Rescue Services for its hard work. I am in this position because of the good tutelage of Ron Jones, a former district captain and firefighter, who has been supporting me on this issue and other things. I also want to note that these firefighters are opposed to the hazardous material that is now going to be allowed over the Ambassador Bridge.

The chemicals found in the materials of their uniforms and in the foam can cause human health issues. Firefighters often have a higher risk of cancer, respiratory diseases and other types of things because of the service they do. These petitioners are joining with many in other places across the country in the call to reduce the exposure of chemicals in the life of firefighters.

Infrastructure October 25th, 2024

Mr. Speaker, the government continues to ignore the people of Windsor-Essex by allowing hazardous material to cross the Ambassador Bridge in a shady deal. We know the border officers will not even get the proper training they need to deal with the eventual disasters that will occur. Instead of detailed in-person courses to go over what to do in the case of disasters, the officials are learning from two slides in an online slide show.

The Liberals continue to cave to the Ambassador Bridge lobbyists to be able to board up homes, to get special privileges and now to line their pockets with hazmat money. Are the Liberals going to choose safety of our environment and economy, or the lobby interests of a U.S. billionaire and his empire?

Privilege October 23rd, 2024

Madam Speaker, speaking of prorogation, I was here when Stephen Harper prorogued Parliament.

Interestingly enough, when we are talking about trade with China, it was Stephen Harper who tried to get subsidized Canadian oil into China to knock out our manufacturing companies in Ontario and other places across the country. Subsidizing oil would have given China a leg-up on Canadian companies, but that is another story.

However, there have been Conservative ministers over the years, with their own controversies, who were also involved with SDTC and the appointment of the board and its officials, including Annette Verschuren and so forth. A good example is Maxime Bernier. Should we call him? He was the one who had the girlfriend who was linked to organized crime. He left classified documents in her apartment. Then there was Tony Clement and the $50 million for the G8 summit. Members might remember the fake lake, the gazebos and so forth that were built in his riding. There was also some online stuff, which I will not get into. Then there was James Moore, who is really interesting because the member talked about child poverty and food banks. James Moore said, “is it my job to feed my neighbour's child? I don't think so.”

Those are the Conservative members and ministers who served when SDTC was operating. Maybe we should bring them here too.

Request for Emergency Debate October 23rd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to request an emergency debate in this chamber, consistent with other emergency debates that have taken place, with regard to the subject matter of the trade route on the Windsor-Detroit corridor.

In less than one week, on October 29, the Government of Canada, unless there is intervention, will permit class 3 and class 8 hazardous waste materials to cross the American-owned Ambassador Bridge. This would be detrimental to our economy; basically, 24% of the national trade between Canada and the United States takes place on this bridge. It has the drinking water for millions of people, the largest fresh water supply in the world and an ecosystem that is right on our doorstep. The material, which includes battery components, battery fluid, hydraulic acid and other things, will cross an over 90-year-old bridge, which is going to cost us with respect to traffic management and ecosystem difficulty.

It was cleared by the Michigan Department of Transportation after it did a thorough investigation on its side about the routing, but that has never been done on the Canadian side. In fact, the Government of Canada and the Province of Ontario did not even make a submission on this with respect to the negligence. The City of Windsor and the Windsor Fire and Rescue Services have opposed it. Many different individuals on the U.S. side have also opposed this. None of them have done any of this work, and there is currently no plan in place to deal with a spill or the materials that could get into our drinking water. It could also cause a backup and a delay in traffic.

This chamber was seized with the blockade of this route in 2022 because it cost the Canadian economy billions of dollars. In fact, in Sarnia, just a month ago, a small leakage that could have been cleaned up properly, as facilitated through a process, shut down that bridge for several hours. That is hundreds of millions of dollars that would take place in the Canadian economy. Not only that, but we do not even have the fire and rescue services plan yet to deal with those issues, so we cannot even use some of the proper techniques necessary.

Further to that, the CBSA union and the CIU, which has been doing the oversight on this, have not even been trained or notified by the government with regard to the issue. Therefore, there is no protocol in place, and the City of Windsor is scrambling to deal with this.

There have been no public hearings. There have been no consultations with the indigenous communities that I am aware of.

The potential danger of explosions and accidents is expanded because the small bridge capacity on the plazas is something that will create further problems that will not be able to be addressed.

The Windsor-Detroit ferry service operation has been opposed to this. It closed just recently. For over 30 years, it brought the materials across in a safe way, with a perfect record. Only recently, through lobbying in the United States, did this change take place at the Michigan Department of Transportation. This is what is odd: We have ceded our sovereignty to the Michigan Department of Transportation, and the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada have not even made representations on this. In fact, they have stood down on it.

A number of different issues have arisen on this bridge in the past. In fact, we had to bring in a law in this country, called the International Bridges and Tunnels Act, because the private property before that was something that we could not even deal with. We had no laws in this country to deal with it. However, because of the behaviour and the management of the Ambassador Bridge, a new law was crafted and created in Canada.

In summary, I want to make sure that we have a chance to discuss this issue in Parliament. If we do not act right now, the routes of those vehicles will change. They are going to go into densely urban areas on the Detroit and Windsor sides. In addition, we do not have any plan in place to date to deal with this issue and, if there is a problem, the consequence to the economy will be significant.

This is an over 90-year-old structure that will have corrosive materials expanded to its system; they could even cause permanent damage. Basic questions relating to firefighter training have not even been provided for right now. There is no plan or support for that. There has been no containment or environmental concern plan developed by the federal or provincial government.

There is a fuel-specific risk that could expand the complications of it, and we do not even know if the Ambassador Bridge authority has provided the proper economic impact assessment for its insurance.

I conclude by asking for this to be looked at tonight, because the Government of Canada has to act. If we do not act right now, a private American billionaire and the Michigan Department of Transportation are going to determine the fate of the international crossing that crosses not only Detroit, Michigan, but from Montreal all the way to Florida. This is with respect to the trade and traffic of 25% of the Canadian economy, as well as the drinking water of millions of people and an ecosystem that is very fragile.

This has been denied on this 90-year-old bridge to date. A process is in place wherein, in a matter of months, within the year or just soon after, the Gordie Howe International Bridge will open up with the best standards for containment, capture and design for that, similar to Sarnia, which has this in place.

It is very suspicious that after all these decades of denying access to these types of capabilities on the bridge, this is being provided when the solution is right in front of us. There is a looming deadline and we have no plans whatsoever in place. Not even union workers or the fire department in the city of Windsor have been trained on this issue.

Why would we change things right now? We have safe crossing solutions in Sarnia at the moment. We will have the Gordie Howe International Bridge open very soon. The chamber needs to discuss this because so much of our economy and ecosystems are at risk. They are very unique and could be permanently damaged. The risk factors are so significant that the history of our crossing, with the freedom of the Underground Railroad, will be disgraced, because if an accident happens, it will pollute one of the most magnificent pieces of fresh water in the world and one of the strongest economic links to our number one trading partner.

Telecommunications October 22nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, when I asked the minister about why he is doing nothing to stop Rogers from gouging Canadians on their cable bills, he refused to answer the question. He is not telling Canadians that his Liberal government is too weak to stand up to Rogers and big telcos ripping them off. It is under his government that the Rogers-Shaw merger was even allowed to happen, leading to higher bills for Canadians. People feel defeated and the Liberals are doing nothing to help. In fact, they are piling it on.

Why are the Liberals caving to big telcos while Canadians are getting gouged? Just because he is a Rogers rollover does not mean the rest of us have to accept that.

Privilege October 22nd, 2024

Madam Speaker, the documents of the testimony about SDTC are available on Open Parliament for the industry committee. I would invite the member to look at them.

One of the things I am interested in, though, especially after listening to the speeches, is that perhaps we should subpoena Stephen Harper, Maxime Bernier and Tony Clement, who actually were part of empowering Annette Verschuren at SDTC during the process. For those who are not aware, Stephen Harper was very much part of Annette Verschuren's rise. Maxime Bernier, who ran as a Conservative leadership candidate at one point and is now part of another party, was industry minister. Tony Clement, whom I have seen in this place with his lobbying and who is still in the universe of the Conservative Party, was part of Annette Verschuren's rise as well.

I would ask the member whether Conservatives would agree to subpoena Stephen Harper, Maxime Bernier and Tony Clement, because their fingerprints are all over this?

Privilege October 22nd, 2024

Madam Speaker, I rises on a point of order. It was referred to that we have record inflation, but when we do a quick search, we had record inflation under Brian Mulroney—

RCMP Allegations of Foreign Interference by the Government of India October 21st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, there was a time here in this place when different leaders of political parties could not get a security clearance. They were not allowed to, and they had to actually fight to be able to gain access to that; that changed. Now, the Conservative leader is fighting to stay away from that security clearance on this particular issue.

It has been standard practice to ensure that our democracy is protected by all Parliaments and all political parties via security clearance. Will the Conservatives go public with other issues that they will not get a security clearance on?