House of Commons photo

Track Garnett

Your Say

Elsewhere

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word is chair.

Conservative MP for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan (Alberta)

Won his last election, in 2025, with 66% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Privilege November 1st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, today we have an opportunity in this Parliament to reflect on the different priorities of the parties. In the Conservative Party, our priorities are clear. We want to axe the tax, build the homes, fix the budget and stop the crime. The Conservatives will axe the carbon tax everywhere for good. The carbon tax is a failed NDP-Liberal policy that has driven up the cost of everything. It has failed to achieve the alleged environmental objectives that are behind it. It has made gas more expensive and emissions have continued to go up under the government. Many Canadians are suffering as the price of basic things Canadians buy goes up as a result of the carbon tax. That is why the Conservatives, rather than tinkering around the edges, would axe the tax everywhere for everyone and for good. We want a carbon tax election now so we can deliver the removal of the carbon tax for Canadians.

The Conservatives will axe the tax and build the homes. We announced a critical new policy this week that would make a significant difference by making homes available for Canadians. The Liberals' own advisers have praised the Conservative plan for building homes. In the last nine years, the Liberals have failed to build homes, and rent has doubled under the Liberals. As we have heard many times, costs are up, crime is up and rent is up, and that is why time is up for the government. Canadians want a new government that will deliver on a real plan to build homes.

The Conservatives will require municipalities to meet critical targets for the construction of new homes. Municipalities that meet those targets will be rewarded; municipalities that do not meet those targets will lose federal funding. This is the kind of real leadership for results that the Conservatives believe in. The Liberals signal that they care without actually doing the hard work of achieving results, and we can measure the outcomes of their policies in the results.

The Liberals think it is all about how much money is spent. They profess that we should look at how much money they have spent on this and that. The real test of a housing policy is not how much money the government has spent; it is how much money Canadians have to spend every month when they pay their rent. A housing policy is working if Canadians are not being forced to pay more and more every month for rent, yet the Liberals want to trumpet their own spending rather than look at the realities of the costs for Canadians.

Costs are up, crime is up and, for the government, time is up. Canadians want a government that is going to build the homes. Therefore, the Conservatives' priorities are to axe the tax, build the homes, fix the budget and stop the crime.

How would we fix the budget? It is very simple. We would bring in a dollar-for-dollar rule requiring that when there is a new dollar of government spending, that dollar is identified as coming from somewhere. We cannot continually increase spending without ever reviewing and looking at where those dollars are going to come from. The Liberals have been living in an economic fantasy world for the last nine years, where they can spend and spend without considering where the money is going to come from. Canadians know that is not the reality. That is not the reality that small businesses face in this country, nor the reality that families face in this country. Eventually, that reality catches up with government as well.

In nine years of the NDP-Liberal government, the national debt has more than doubled. Debt servicing costs have soared. Canadians are paying more because of the carbon tax, but also because of the inflation tax. The increase in government spending is driving up the costs that Canadians face by reducing the value of the dollar in their pocket. If we have more dollars chasing the same number of goods, that is not going to make anyone richer. It simply means that everything is going to cost more in dollar terms.

We need a government that is going to replace this incontinent fiscal policy with a focused, disciplined fiscal policy that includes a dollar-for-dollar rule. If we are going to propose a new spending program, we have to be able to explain where the money is coming from. The Liberals have run massive deficits in every single year they have been in power. In reality, this is not what Canadians have traditionally associated with the Liberal Party. It is more of a radical NDP fiscal policy. This is an NDP-Liberal government we see. As we can identify in today's discussion on the corruption motion, effectively, with this reconstituted coalition between the NDP and the Liberals, we have the worst of both worlds.

We have NDP fiscal and economic policy and we have Liberal ethics. That is what we have with the NDP-Liberal government, the radical far-left NDP approach to the economy applied to government, along with the Liberals' disregard for our institutions, for the rule of law and for proper accountability in government. This, again, is why Canadians are looking at the situation and they are saying that time is up for the NDP-Liberal government. Time is up for the Liberal government. We need a new government with new priorities, priorities that involve axing the tax, building the homes, fixing the budget and stopping the crime.

On the issue of crime, it is very clear in the last nine years that, under the NDP-Liberals, violent crime has gotten so much worse in Canada. The government should be judged not by their words but by the results. It will be judged by the results of what it has done. Costs are up for Canadians and crime is up dramatically because of policy choices that they made.

Liberals would always like to present themselves as victims of circumstance. They would like people to believe that as soon as they got into office, things started going wrong but that it had nothing to do with them. That is the story that they would like to tell, yet we can see, with criminal justice policy in particular, that they made specific decisions around sentencing and enforcement that changed the rates of violent crime in this country.

Conservatives would restore common sense when it comes to criminal justice policy. That includes jail, not bail, for repeat violent offenders. That includes support for treatment and recovery for those who are struggling with addictions. Liberals have pursued a failed drug policy, which is paying the pushers of drugs. Their policy of safe supply is leading more money to go back into the pockets of bad corporate actors like Purdue Pharma that make dangerous drugs that are then given away for free, at taxpayers' expense, to those who are struggling.

Conservatives would sue those bad corporate actors like Purdue Pharma and McKinsey that are responsible for the opioid crisis. We would put that money into treatment and recovery. This emphasis on treatment and recovery would help address the challenges we face with crime.

For those who commit violent offences in this country, they are going to face serious consequences under a common-sense Conservative government. Our priorities are to axe the tax, build the homes, fix the budget and stop the crime, to restore the country that we know and love, to bring it home, to bring home the country that Canadians remember.

It was not this way before Justin Trudeau. Pardon me. It was not this way before the Prime Minister

Points of Order November 1st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, with respect to the accusations about what I allegedly said during question period, as I recall, I honestly was not even paying attention to the member's question during question period. However, the point is, holding one's arms out is not an act of violence.

This member is repeatedly using unparliamentary language in the House. One cannot say in the House the things that this member has said. This member thinks that she can get away with ignoring the rules. I think it is important that there be one standard of adherence to parliamentary rules. The name-calling and the insults are unparliamentary, and this member needs to be brought to order.

Points of Order November 1st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I would simply say that the member for Winnipeg Centre has, today and on many occasions, made comments that are clearly unparliamentary in making accusations against members. Regardless of whether we couch them in whatever kind of framing around demographics, there are clear rules on parliamentary language, and this member from Winnipeg consistently uses unparliamentary language, as we have heard on multiple occasions today. She should be called to order by the Chair, consistent with how any other member would be treated, and she should be told she has to apologize.

Petitions November 1st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I will table one more petition, highlighting the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners. The petitioners are very concerned about how Falun Gong practitioners have faced a decades-long campaign of violence by the CCP in China. That campaign of violence has included various forms of persecution, including forced organ harvesting.

The petitioners who have signed the petition would like to see the House take stronger measures to combat the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners in the People's Republic of China and to seek the release of various political prisoners currently in prison, especially those with close connections to Canada.

Petitions November 1st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, the next petition I am tabling raises concern about another proposal for the expansion of euthanasia. While there have been so many abuses already, with Canadians who are struggling with the cost of living, for example, being pushed toward considering this option, the focus of the government, rather than being on alleviating the suffering of Canadians, has been on trying to propose further expansion of the already most liberal euthanasia regime in the world.

Petitioners are raising concern about a proposal to expand euthanasia to include “babies from birth to one year of age”. The proposal for the legalized killing of infants, obviously without their consent, is deeply disturbing to many Canadians. It was a proposal made by Louis Roy of the Quebec college of physicians before a parliamentary committee. The petitioners would like to see the House soundly reject the proposal.

Petitions November 1st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, next I am tabling a petition highlighting a variety of concerns regarding human rights and abuses by the Government of Eritrea. Petitioners want the House to note first of all that Eritrea has been ruled by an authoritarian, brutal dictator under a totalitarian system for the last 30 years, with no constitution, no election, no parliament, no freedom of the press, and no freedom of movement and association. Although Eritrea gets less attention, it is generally known, as a result of this reality, as being the North Korea of Africa in terms of governance.

Eritreans continue to flee indefinite military conscription, religious persecution and political repression. Eritreans who have sought asylum around the world, including here in Canada, continue to be concerned about foreign interference, about how the Eritrean government through its embassies tries to undermine the human rights of people who have fled and interfere in the affairs of other sovereign countries. Various instances of this are highlighted in the petition.

In addition, petitioners want to draw the attention of the House to how the Eritrean dictator collaborates with Vladimir Putin and other adversaries, other authoritarian regimes around the world. Petitioners call on the House to take a number of steps to engage more with Eritrean human rights activists and pro-democracy groups, to take a leadership stand against the Eritrean dictator's malicious conspiracy with Vladimir Putin and to investigate instances of foreign interference in Canada involving the Eritrean regime, to ensure that people who are agents of the regime are not able to misuse our asylum system to come to Canada.

Petitioners want stronger sanctions against human rights abusers who are associated with the Eritrean regime, and they also are calling for the release of various political prisoners, including imprisoned journalist Dawit Isaak, who is the longest-imprisoned journalist in the world, as well as various imprisoned Eritrean former parliamentarians: Petros Solomon, Mahmoud Ahmed Sheriffo, Haile Woldetensae, Ogbe Abraha, Hamad Hamid Hamad, Saleh Kekiya, Estifanos Seyoum, Berhane Gebregziabher, Aster Fissehatsion, Germano Nati and Beraki Gebreslassie.

I commend the important petition to the consideration of my colleagues.

Petitions November 1st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to table a number of petitions on behalf of my constituents. I hope there will not be too much heckling. Although heckling is allowed, we certainly would not want to throw out the baby with the bathwater in that regard.

The first petition I am tabling is in support of Bill C-257, which is an excellent private member's bill I have tabled in the House. It would add political belief and activity as prohibited grounds of discrimination within the Canadian Human Rights Act. Petitioners note that currently there is no prohibition against discriminating against someone on the basis of their political beliefs, and that adding that prohibition would align well with prohibitions on discrimination on the basis of other characteristics already protected in the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Petitioners note in particular that it is in the best interests of democracy to protect public debate and the free exchange of ideas. Political discrimination can deter individuals from participating and limit their ability to participate freely in public debate. Bill C-257 would protect the free exchange of ideas that helps to advance the common good through substantial exchanges among free people.

Petitioners therefore want the House to pass Bill C-257 and to take other measures to defend the rights of Canadians to peacefully express their political opinions.

Public Services and Procurement November 1st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals' indigenous contracting scandal is the biggest Liberal scandal yet. The Liberal government used the indigenous contracting program to send money to well-connected, non-indigenous insiders using shell companies, shady joint ventures and outright fabrication. Indigenous leaders say that most of those who benefited from this program are shell companies.

Will these fraudsters and their Liberal enablers be held accountable, and will they pay back the money they took from taxpayers and real indigenous businesses?

Petitions October 31st, 2024

Madam Speaker, finally, I would like to table a petition opposing the Liberal government's attack on natural health products. Petitioners are deeply concerned about the attack we are seeing on natural health products, which was part of the last budget, and how the Liberals have increasingly taken steps to make natural health products more expensive and less accessible and to undermine the natural health product industry.

Petitioners call on the Government of Canada to reverse the changes that were brought in as part of the last Liberal budget.

Petitions October 31st, 2024

Madam Speaker, it was just in case I got a call in the middle of tabling petitions. I have turned it off, in all seriousness.

This petition is about seeking the release of Mr. Celil. Petitioners want the House to formally state that the release of Mr. Celil from detention is a priority for the Canadian government and is of equal concern to the unjust detention of the two Michaels. They would like to see the appointment of a special envoy working on Mr. Celil's release. They would like to see the Government of Canada engage with the American administration and seek its assistance in pursuing this release.