Mr. Speaker, the members of the Progressive Conservative Party will be voting yes, with the member for South Shore and the member for Fundy—Royal voting no.
House of Commons photoWon his last election, in 2011, with 43% of the vote.
Assisted Human Reproduction Act March 26th, 2003
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Progressive Conservative Party will be voting yes, with the member for South Shore and the member for Fundy—Royal voting no.
Assisted Human Reproduction Act March 26th, 2003
Mr. Speaker, I wanted to ensure that we were voting the same way as we voted on Motion No. 9.
Assisted Human Reproduction Act March 26th, 2003
Mr. Speaker, members of the Progressive Conservative Party will be voting no, with the members for New Brunswick Southwest, Cumberland--Colchester, Gander--Grand Falls, Saint John and St. John's East voting yes.
Assisted Human Reproduction Act March 26th, 2003
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Progressive Conservative Party will be voting no, with the exception of the member for Fundy—Royal who will be voting yes.
Assisted Human Reproduction Act March 26th, 2003
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Progressive Conservative Party will be voting yes, with the exception of the member for Fundy—Royal and the member for Richmond—Arthabaska, who will vote no.
Assisted Human Reproduction Act March 26th, 2003
Mr. Speaker, members of the Progressive Conservative Party vote yes to the motion.
Assisted Human Reproduction Act March 26th, 2003
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Progressive Conservative Party vote yes to the motion.
Assisted Human Reproduction Act March 26th, 2003
Mr. Speaker, on a point of clarification, I want to be sure that the vote being recorded will represent the votes as they were split, because the members for New Brunswick Southwest, Cumberland—Colchester, Gander—Grand Falls, Saint John and St. John's East should be recorded as voting yes.
Firearms Program March 25th, 2003
Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Solicitor General. On April Fool's day, the Solicitor General inherits one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated on the Canadian public. I can only say they picked the right day.
The truth about the costs and the practicality of the gun registry have been hidden from Canadians and continue to be hidden from Canadians. Will the new Solicitor General stop this Liberal sleight of hand and guarantee public disclosure on a regular and consistent basis on all gun control costs and information?
Supply March 25th, 2003
That's right, it should not be referred to as a criminal act. It should be referred to as an omission of justice because that is exactly what it was. The ministers responsible for the Treasury Board, justice, and the subsequent ministers responsible for this knew they were not following parliamentary procedure and deliberately hid the costs from the Canadian public.
They went a step further than that. They also did not hold their deputy ministers nor their assistant deputy ministers responsible. They did not hold anyone who touched this project in the civil service responsible. It has always been my submission that politicians should be responsible for the civil service and not the other way around. I think in this case it is so blatant that the whole gamut, the entire group of people who touched this, should be held accountable for it.