House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was million.

Last in Parliament October 2015, as Conservative MP for Eglinton—Lawrence (Ontario)

Lost his last election, in 2015, with 43% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, at the beginning of this year, I was pleased to announce that the major banks in Canada had publicly committed to enhancing low-cost bank accounts. The maximum monthly fee for these accounts is $4. They are available to all Canadians. Low-cost bank accounts allow consumers to make 12 transactions per debit card per month and exercise chequing privileges without any additional fees for deposits, debit cards, pre-authorized payment forms and monthly printed statements. The eight main banks in Canada also—

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, in Canada, consumers have an array of choices. For example, consumers can chose from over 100 different types of bank accounts, with a mix of features and fees, from 40 different providers.

In fact, almost one-third of Canadians currently pay no monthly banking fees for their bank accounts.

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, I quoted the Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses and I will now quote the National Post: the code played a big role in saving low-cost debit in Canada and gave merchants some degree of power in dealing with the payments industry.

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, as I said, last fall the government accepted the voluntary commitments by Visa and MasterCard to reduce credit card fees to an average effective card rate of 1.5% for the next five years.

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, in April, the government launched public consultations on the oversight of national retail payment systems, in order to further enhance consumer protection.

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business says, and I quote:

[The code] has served merchants extremely well....[It] has done an excellent job in ensuring some fair ground rules and maintaining Canada’s low-cost debit system.

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, in April, the government announced major improvements to the Code of Conduct for the Credit and Debit Card Industry in Canada. These changes address issues raised by merchants and consumers. This improved code of conduct provides greater flexibility and protection to merchants and more choice to consumers.

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, we have heard the concerns of businesspeople and consumers alike.

Last fall, the government accepted voluntary commitments by Visa Canada and MasterCard Canada to reduce credit card fees to an average effective rate of 1.5% for the next five years.

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, I would be pleased to answer the question about why balanced budgets matter.

A balanced budget matters because it allows the government to cut taxes even more for hard-working Canadians, creating jobs, growth, and long-term prosperity. It means less debt for future generations, ensures that taxpayer dollars go toward important social programs like education and health care rather than debt repayment, and it gives the government more flexibility to respond to a crisis like a recession or war or natural disaster. It preserves our triple-A credit rating, the top credit rating that a country can have, allows for international shocks, and it prevents passing on more debt to our children.

What is also important is how the budget is balanced. In our case, it came from strict fiscal discipline. Unlike the Liberals, we will not raise taxes or slash transfers to people, provinces, and territories. Our government has cut taxes every year since taking office. Over 180 tax relief measures have been undertaken since 2006. What is the result? The result is that Canadians now benefit from the lowest overall federal tax burden in more than half a century.

These benefits of balancing the budget are so important that we are proposing a law with pay cuts to ministers and top bureaucrats if the government falls into deficit in normal economic times. We believe that Ottawa is capable of doing what families have to do every day. That means setting priorities and making choices. We will propose that if a government posts a deficit outside of extraordinary circumstances, an automatic operating freeze would go into effect and there would be a cut in salaries for ministers and deputy ministers by 5%.

Our government will balance the budget and continue to ensure that hard-working Canadian families have more money in their pockets when they need it most. Our government has paid down $37 billion in debt since 2006, prior to the great recession that rocked the world economy. That forward thinking helped Canada to achieve the lowest total government net debt to GDP ratio in the G7, and made it affordable to boost growth through federal spending without compromising our top-notch credit rating.

Responsible fiscal management and firm control over direct program spending put Canada on a predictable path back to a balanced budget by 2015, providing consumers and businesses with the confidence to invest and grow the economy. As the The New York Times recently reported, after-tax income for middle-class Canadians, substantially behind in 2000, now appears to be higher than in the United States. In fact, the Canadian middle class is among the richest in the developed world. Bloomberg has ranked Canada as the second-most attractive place in the world to do business.

Our approach is working. Since the depths of the recession, over 1.2 million net new jobs have been created, overwhelmingly full-time, well-paying, and in the private sector.

However, these are tough economic times around the world. It is not time for risky, high-tax, high-spend Liberal initiatives. In a fragile global economy, we must continue taking action to create jobs, growth, and long-term prosperity. Our government plan would do exactly do that by fulfilling our long-standing commitment to balancing the federal budget.

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, the answer to the question, as I gave it before, is not whether it costs the government money; it is whether a structure can be built that is fair and predictable for all participants. We will continue to monitor these issues to make sure workers and pensioners and other creditors are treated in a fair way in bankruptcy proceedings.

Business of Supply May 25th, 2015

Mr. Chair, I understood the question.

In cases of bankruptcy, there are complex legal issues that provide priorities, and where people go into credit arrangements, they have a certain expectation of how they will be created. We, of course, continue to examine the tax system to make sure that it is fair for workers and for pensioners.