House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was whether.

Last in Parliament March 2011, as Liberal MP for Eglinton—Lawrence (Ontario)

Lost his last election, in 2011, with 38% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Hepatitis C June 5th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the member will recall of course that the first compensation package that was announced some couple of months ago had as signatories all of the provincial premiers as well as the territorial ministers and all ministers of health.

As I indicated in this House before, on a matter of such seriousness the only thing that is workable of course is a consensus position, which involves all authorities throughout the country. It was such a position that was presented to all victims. I think it received the accord and agreement of everyone. Now we are in a position where all of those same players are once again at a table—

Motions For Papers June 3rd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased my colleague opposite has at least recognized the compensation package that was fashioned thanks to the leadership of the Minister of Health for Canada together with his colleagues at the provincial and territorial level. It has finally been acknowledged as something that in and of itself is very good. In fact I think he said unquestionably acceptable.

We all know what has transpired since the package which deserves all those adjectives was placed before the House and before the Canadian public. To be more specific, to get to a resolution of some of the things that have transpired in the last couple of months, as the member has indicated the federal authorities together with the provincial and territorial counterparts met in Edmonton for two days.

I remind members in the House and those watching the proceedings that the victims were also present through their representatives. Some positions have been floated through the press. Some have come before the House and others have been addressed by interested parties with respect to how to deal with those who fall outside the package that we placed before the House and the Canadian public some two months ago.

Those positions were discussed. They were evaluated. I dare say they were probably placed in some kind of balance so the working group could consider substantive issues and deal with short term and long term implications, cost implications, health delivery system implications and jurisdictional implications.

That is where the working group is now. We hope it will conclude its study in short order.

Tobacco Publicity June 3rd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the member in her research will probably have come across a supreme court decision that reversed the situation as it was a few years ago.

Our government, since we were elected in 1993, has been addressing these issues. In the last parliament just before the session ended we presented legislation that addressed specifically the health of young people and smoking habits. It dealt with promotion. It dealt with sponsorship and we are continuing in a balanced approach that will withstand the scrutiny of the courts as well as the scrutiny of—

Tobacco Publicity June 3rd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the minister will table the legislation before the House in about 25 minutes and I am sure the member opposite will be anxious to examine that legislation and see whether her allegations would withstand a test of ink on paper.

I dare say she may find herself in total surprise because the interests of this government are, have been and will continue to be the health of all Canadians, nothing else.

Hepatitis C June 3rd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the federal government has not entered into any discussions with any preconceived or predetermined notions.

The mere fact we are there is an indication that we take our commitment seriously. I repeat for members on both sides of the House that we brought all the partners together so we could consider all the options people brought to the table to give the working group something to work with.

After the working group deliberates and digests all the suggestions—and there have been many—and completes its study there will be something for implementation. Why not let the—

Hepatitis C June 3rd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I guess it must be a day for being down and being a bit of a fearmonger.

We said that we were to receive all submissions, consider all ideas, bring all the partners together and try to fashion a consensus because that is the only way things can work. We have received those. We also invited the representatives of the hepatitis C victims groups who made their submissions.

Now it is time for us to let the working group digest that material and fashion something that can be worked out to the satisfaction of all concerned.

Tobacco Act June 3rd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the member's silliness is getting away from him.

One of the things the member wants to do is to wait until House procedures allow for the tabling of the legislation. Then he will be satisfied, as he was with the last one, with the very vigorous approach to dealing with a serious health issue.

He will find that he should be applauding the total ban when it is brought forward if that is in fact what he will find. I am confident that he will be happy the minister will have shown such vigour.

Health June 3rd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I fear that the member is more interested in fearmongering than in the facts. Since this party came to government there has been no sale allowed in Canada of silicone gel-filled implants at all. In fact, if credit must be given, there has not been any such sale permitted in Canada since 1991.

I do not know whereof the hon. member speaks. We are conducting ourselves in a most responsible fashion. We are requiring all manufacturers to meet the safety and quality standards required by health protection—

Health June 3rd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, if the member would get away from bombast for a moment and listen to some of the facts she would understand that there has been responsibility all the way through.

The minister of health of the day, a Conservative minister, conducted two audits of the department and its methods and approaches to the regulatory process. The first audit, an internal audit, indicated that the department was following the regulatory process to the letter.

The second audit, which was conducted by Peat Marwick Thorne, gave an indication that there was an assiduous following of the rules and regulations—

Hepatitis C June 3rd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, there is no strategy to prejudge anything and there is no strategy to thwart anything.

The member opposite will recognize that the process has been extremely open and it includes, as well, the victims and their representatives.

Once the working group is in place it will come forward with a presentation which will be the presentation that will be acted on. I know she wants to make the process work and I think she should allow that to happen.