House of Commons photo

Track Kyle

Your Say

Elsewhere

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word is liberals.

Conservative MP for Dufferin—Caledon (Ontario)

Won his last election, in 2025, with 60% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Privilege December 2nd, 2024

Madam Speaker, the short answer to that is yes. It is another program where there has been catastrophic mismanagement by the NDP-Liberal government.

What I talked about in my speech was that they chose to give non-competitive bidded contracts to one company. Here, 313 million dollars' worth of contracts out of $342 million went to one company with non-competitive bids. That company decided to have the program administered mostly through Brazil. There are Canadian dollars to support a Canadian program that actually went to a company that hired people in Brazil. We cannot make up this kind of incompetence.

On top of that, $3.5 billion went to 77,000 recipients who were ineligible. Was there malfeasance in this? That needs to be looked into as well; we know how corrupt the NDP-Liberal government has been.

Privilege December 2nd, 2024

Madam Speaker, the NDP-Liberal coalition is alive and well, and the NDP is not taking the government to task for its failure to produce corruption documents. I understand why the member is probably not asking about that. It is because he knows that, once the documents come out, the NDP will not be able to prop up the government anymore. His leader will not get his pension, and they will actually have to try to vote non-confidence in the government, which they are catastrophically afraid of doing.

Instead of talking about the task at hand, the member tries to bring up something from 15 years ago to distract. The NDP-Liberal coalition is alive and well in Parliament.

Privilege December 2nd, 2024

Madam Speaker, that is a disgusting slur even for the member, who always sinks to the bottom of the barrel when she asks a question.

I supported Patrick Brown because I have known him for 20 years. Throughout the course of the campaign, as his campaign platform was unrolled, I realized that his vision of Canada did not match mine. I believed in the Leader of the Opposition's platform. I had a conversation and asked if I could come over and support the current leader of the Conservative Party, and then I did.

The member cannot even defend what the government has done by asking a question about the matters before us. Instead, she sinks into the gutter to try to cast aspersions on my character. It is disgusting, but, unfortunately, it is what I expect from her.

Privilege December 2nd, 2024

Madam Speaker, I cannot believe that I am back here today to speak about this motion. I think I spoke to this motion maybe three-plus weeks ago. It could have been four weeks ago. All of this could end if the government simply released the documents. It has stubbornly refused to do so. I can only come up with one reason. in my background as a lawyer, there is only one reason to hide something. The reason we are going to hide something is because it is so bad and so damning that clogging up the House of Commons so that no other work gets done is actually the preferable option.

We have to think about that for a minute. Liberals could have released the documents three and a half or four weeks ago and gotten on with their so-called agenda. I think it is a terrible agenda, and I think it has brought us to where we are as a country, where rent has doubled, housing prices have doubled, one in four Canadian parents are skipping meals for their children and two million people are going to food banks. We think it is a terrible agenda, as do most Canadians.

The NDP-Liberals are in a coalition. They are not. I cannot keep track. The NDP keeps voting confidence in them, so I guess they are still in an agreement, but maybe they are not, because the NDP leader ripped up the agreement but keeps voting support, so I do not know. I digress.

The NDP-Liberal government has an agenda that it thinks is working. Objectively, it is not but it thinks it is. The Liberals' decision has been that they are not going to bring forward their agenda at all because they will not release these documents. Any reasonable person has to ask themselves this very simple question. Why are they working so hard to hide these documents? A reasonable person, any person, would have to come to the same conclusion that we have, that these documents are so damning, that they are such an indictment of the government and the minister in charge, they will move heaven and earth not to release the documents. It is legitimately the only thing we can be left with. This is a scandal-plagued government. We know that. We have had a minister recently resign for a raft of scandals. He took off out of here under a cloud of scandal. Let me say that this will be worse.

It is across the entire breadth and scope of the government. We just heard today, from the Auditor General, about the CEBA business loans. There was $3.5 billion to 77,000 recipients who were not eligible. There might be some NDP-Liberals over there asking what that has to do with this. It is because this is exactly what happened at SDTC. A whole bunch of Liberal insiders got money with a process that was not the normal process. It was just a printing press for Liberal insiders. We have now looked at the CEBA business loans and we are finding the same thing. Again, this is why they try to cover up everything, because they know the truth is so damning to their incompetence and their corruption.

What is even worse, what the Auditor General revealed today is that the whole CEBA loan process was administered by Accenture in a non-competitive process. The government just gave it the contract. It gave it $313 million out of the $342-million worth of contracts awarded. Guess what? Most of the work it did was done in Brazil. It did not even benefit Canadians. We would think a Canadian program that is being managed by a Canadian company would actually be administered by Canadians. It makes little sense to me. It does not make sense to these guys because literally nothing they do makes sense.

As far as these kinds of scandals are concerned, it is kind of a strange place that we are in right now here in Canada. Every week, there is a new scandal that should bring down a government.

It has become so commonplace for the Liberals to be caught with their fingers in the cookie jar that it is hard to shock people, but Canadians should be shocked with how they have behaved with respect to these contracts. Just to reiterate, the Auditor General found in the green slush fund that 82% of the contracts were awarded inappropriately. Now that is an A-. When I was in school, if I got an A- I would be pretty excited. The Liberals have an A- in corruption. I suspect that if they keep working hard at it like they are, they could get that grade up to an A or an A+ before the next election, something they should be really proud of. That is probably what they are working hard on, going forward.

Why are we pressing so hard for these documents? It is because we know these documents are going to be so bad for the government that we have said we will keep debating this issue until it produces them. I am going to read a quote from a whistle-blower on this case so that Canadians who are watching can understand exactly why we are working so hard to get these documents produced. One of the whistle-blowers said that, “The true failure of the situation stands at the feet of our current government”. That is the NDP-Liberal government, the people over there, “whose decision to protect wrongdoers and cover up...over the last 12 months is a serious indictment of how our democratic systems and institutions are being corrupted by political interference.” Let us think about that for a second. That was from a brave whistle-blower who took a risk to expose the corruption. The words used are incredibly powerful and damning. The person went on to say that, “It should never have taken two years for the issues to reach this point. What should have been a straightforward process turned into a bureaucratic nightmare that allowed SDTC to continue wasting millions of dollars and abusing countless employees over the last year.”

If we had a government that was not corrupt, someone would have been held accountable. I remember a time when there was this thing called ministerial accountability. Ministers who were found to have engaged in egregious conduct had the honour of resigning. What has happened here? The absolute opposite has happened. What has happened at SDTC is an ongoing, unfolding scandal. A scandal, according to one whistle-blower, that is an indictment of our democratic systems, and our “institutions are being corrupted by political influence”, all to award juicy, big, fat contracts from Liberal insiders to Liberal businesses from a program that was supposed to be monitored by a Liberal minister.

There are two things that could have happened. First, the minister is absolutely incompetent. Okay, so fire that incompetent minister, right? A minister who allowed this to take place is de facto incompetent. It is their department; they are responsible. There is this thing called ministerial responsibility. If somebody is an incompetent minister and they allow a raft of corruption to take place, corruption so much that it threatens our democratic systems and our institutions, that minister is incompetent and should have resigned. If the minister did not have the honour to resign, they should have been fired. That is scenario number one. Scenario number two, which is a little bit darker, is that the minister actually knew the corruption was taking place, and decided to do nothing.

We must ask ourselves this question. We are four weeks into demanding the release of the documents. The Liberals' entire political agenda has ground to a halt as a result of this. Let us think about the two options that I just presented. Was it that the minister was incompetent, so they are trying to protect incompetence? I do not think so.

Scenario two is the real scenario, that there was widespread corruption that the minister had to have been aware of and turned a blind eye to, just like the whistle-blower said, which is why the Liberals will fight tooth and nail not to release the documents, because they will show how systematic and systemic the corruption in this program was, and that it reached the highest levels of this government. Therefore, they will not release these documents under any circumstances, which is the sad but accurate state of affairs with this NDP-Liberal government.

These NDP-Liberals keep saying is, “Oh, there's no criminality; the Auditor General didn't find any criminality”, and that is true; it is one of the very few accurate statements we get. However, here is what a whistle-blower said about this: “Just as I was always confident that the Auditor General would confirm the financial mismanagement at SDTC, I remain equally confident that the RCMP will substantiate the criminal activities that occurred within the organization.” The whistle-blower is saying that they are confident that the RCMP will find criminal wrongdoing.

Let us go back to the scenarios I was just talking about before. We have two possible scenarios here on why the Liberals are not releasing the documents. Scenario one, as I said, is that we have a completely incompetent minister who allowed a whole bunch of bad apples to run rampant through this program, doling out cash and making it rain for all of their Liberal insiders and buddies. Scenario two is that we have widespread corruption. Do members remember the sponsorship scandal that brought the end to the previous Liberal government, with people stuffing money in little bags going around the place? The Liberals tried to deny that as well, if I recall. They said, “Oh, there's nothing to see here.” Well, there was a lot to see. So, the second scenario, again, with what this whistle-blower is saying, is that there was criminality.

If there was criminality, why do the Liberals want to hide the documents? We have to keep asking this question. This whistle-blower is saying that they are equally confident that there will be criminality found. Why would this person say that? It is because they obviously witnessed the criminality. Now, the criminality could have been from the people at the department, which may well very have been the case, but if that was the case, why would the Liberals not just release the documents, because they do not have absolute control over the people who work there? The only reason they would be hiding documents that likely would have criminality involved is because the criminality just keeps moving up the food chain to people who knew, and that is the reason why they are refusing to release these documents, and why they have paralyzed this Parliament for the last four weeks in their absolute obstinance to release the documents.

They are so desperate to cover this up that they might have this go on for the next 15 months. Why? They know that the documents will bring an end to their government; they are that damning. It is the only explanation that I can see. Again, the Liberals said that there was no criminality, which is one of their defences in this. Then they said that there was no criminal intent, which is the other one. Well, it is interesting because there was a whistle-blower who talked about criminal intent; imagine that. The whistle-blower said, “I know that the federal government, like the minister, has continued saying that there was no criminal intent and nothing was found, but I think the committee would agree that they're not to be trusted on this situation.”

Sometimes we get real pearls of wisdom from people who come forward and make statements on this. I think the committee would agree that the Liberals are not to be trusted on this situation. However, what this Liberal government is asking Canadians to do is to trust it on these documents. We have produced documents and we have redacted 80%, or whatever it is, of the documents: “Just trust us. There is nothing damning in these redactions. It's just standard procedure.” I think what we have learned from these NDP-Liberals is that they absolutely cannot be trusted with these kinds of documents.

We heard way back in the day with respect to Jody Wilson-Raybould that the story in The Globe and Mail was false. Do members remember that was what the Prime Minister said? Then, remarkably, the story was actually true.

When we look at whether the Liberals should be trusted on this, I think there is no one who still wants to trust them. There might be a few hard-core Liberal supporters in downtown Toronto, but anywhere else in the country, the trust in these guys is at zero, as it should be.

The whistle-blower, Witness 1, goes on to say, “I would happily agree to whatever the findings are by the RCMP, but I...wouldn't trust that there isn't any criminality unless the RCMP is given full authority to investigate.”

Again, the whistle-blower is saying that they cannot trust them, that they think there is criminality here and that the RCMP should investigate for criminality. We go back to asking ourselves why they will not release the documents. I have said this several times, but it is really important that this point hits home: They will not release the documents, despite four-plus weeks of not getting their agenda through Parliament, because they just know the degree of criminality that is going to be found in these documents and how damning it will be for their government.

I will phrase this in a way that everyone can understand. The government has been mired in scandals for the past two years. It is not new to scandal; it is not something new or shocking. One would think that, at a certain point, the Liberals would say that another scandal is no big deal. They would just get those documents out and say it would blow over in a couple of weeks.

However, they do not. The Liberals are still obstructing Parliament and not producing the documents. It goes back to the fact that this is not an everyday, run-of-the-mill scandal. It is actually really sad when we have to say that phrase, “not an everyday, run-of-the-mill scandal” by a government. It is because of how many scandals and how corrupt the government has been proven to be that we get to use that phrase.

It is not a run-of-the-mill scandal, however, or the Liberals would just release the documents. They would do what they normally do: a Friday evening document dump. We all know it. That is when the government takes out the trash. It puts something out at 5 p.m. on a Friday, usually on a long weekend, such as Thanksgiving or the August long weekend, because the Liberals know Canadians are not paying attention.

However, the government did not even do a document dump on this. Again, it is because the Liberals know that what is in these documents will bring about the end of the government. We know there is going to be an end. When we have a carbon tax election, which is coming, that will be the end for the Liberals. They just want to desperately hold on as long as they can.

The NDP wants to hold on as long as it can because the leader needs his pension. That is why the NDP keeps propping up the Liberals at every opportunity. The New Democrats say they ripped up the agreement, but they prop the Liberals up. Unfortunately, the government is going to keep going. If it released these documents, it would actually be the end. Even the NDP would not be able to prop the Liberals up anymore, because the documents are so bad. That is why they are not releasing the documents. It is why we are where we are today. It brings me no joy to be here speaking about this another time. The Liberals have made this choice.

The conflicts that go on in this program are really unbelievable. We now have another minister mired in scandal. First, we have the minister who was responsible for SDTC; we have come to the conclusion that he is either incompetent or involved in this scheme. We now also have the Minister of Environment, who was a strategic adviser for Cycle Capital Management, which got a whole bunch of money from the green slush fund. I wonder how that happened. Given that point, I wonder why the Liberals do not want to release the documents. There are at least two ministers who we know will be very badly exposed by the documents.

I will end with this: This has gone on long enough. It is very simple. All the Liberals have to do is release the unredacted documents, and we can get back to the business of the House.

U.S. Tariffs on Canadian Products November 26th, 2024

Madam Speaker, if only he knew someone in the government if these alleged cuts took place, which of course they did not. The Conservatives cut bureaucracy, not frontline BSOs. If only he knew someone in the government to fix this problem if it existed. They have been in the government for nine years. They have not figured out that there is a problem with the border. It is the epitome of why we are where we are; the government is incompetent from top to bottom.

U.S. Tariffs on Canadian Products November 26th, 2024

Madam Speaker, I do not even know what to make of that. It is not a question that is relevant to any of the debate tonight with respect to an emergency debate on proposed tariffs by President-elect Trump. The contribution of the Green Party to this debate is to talk about a comment about the wokification of the military, which is actually a legitimate problem. It is one of the reasons we are having such a difficult time attracting soldiers. The Liberal government has really destroyed proud military institutions in this country. I am disappointed that this is the member's contribution to the serious threat to workers' jobs in this country, which has resulted from the mismanagement of the trade relationship. I thought she would ask that question, rather than trying to attack the next prime minister of this country.

U.S. Tariffs on Canadian Products November 26th, 2024

Madam Speaker, we voted against the Ukraine free trade agreement because they tried to impose a carbon tax in a trade agreement for the first time ever. I read every trade agreement we have. Carbon pricing and carbon leakage are not in a single one of them. They were trying to put a carbon tax in a trade agreement with a country at war. It was a terrible thing to do; that is why I voted against it.

On the renegotiation, I have read the book by the United States lead negotiator. The member should read it. In it, with respect to their great negotiating tactics, he states that, on August 27, they had an arrangement with only a few hours to spare. However, the entire Canadian delegation was absent because of the cold U.S.-Canada relationships that went from June until August 22, when a new United States-Mexico trade agreement was signed.

Canada was not at the table for three months of those negotiations because of the absolute and utter incompetence of the Liberal Prime Minister and government. The Americans had a trade agreement and said that Canada could sign it or not. If that is negotiating well, they need to go back to school.

U.S. Tariffs on Canadian Products November 26th, 2024

Madam Speaker, tonight we are having an emergency debate to discuss proposed 25% tariffs by the President-elect of the United States. We have to ask ourselves, “How did we get here?” The answer to that question is, “It is because the Liberals have so badly managed our relationship with the United States over the past nine years.” I could speak for two or three hours about that, but I only have 10 minutes, so I will only be able to address a few of these issues.

The first one is softwood lumber. We have had a softwood lumber dispute, unresolved by these Liberals, for the last nine years. As a result of this, we have lost tens of thousands of jobs in the forestry sector, and over $9 billion in duties has been collected by the United States. That $9 billion could have been used to invest in new equipment, new machinery, new sawmills, new technology and new jobs for Canadian workers. Instead, sawmills have closed and Canadian workers have lost their jobs, many of them unionized workers. These were good-paying jobs. They have all gone down to the United States.

Now, I understand why the United States is doing that, because they are trying to protect their workers. The question is, why has the Liberal Prime Minister repeatedly failed to protect Canadian workers? That is just on softwood lumber. Those tariffs total, on average, the countervailing and anti-dumping duties, about 15%, and it has wreaked havoc on Canadian workers. Now, we can only imagine what the proposed tariff of 25% would do to forestry workers from coast to coast to coast across Canada. That is failure number one, and the old saying is the sequel is always worse than the original.

The original failure by the government has been on softwood lumber. It is a horror movie in and of itself. However, the sequels actually just keep getting worse. The effect on Canadian workers is bad enough, but Canadians in general suffer the consequences of a Prime Minister who has incompetently managed the relationship with our largest trading partner. Let us remember, the trading relationship with the United States accounts for 40% of our GDP. It is the most important trading relationship that we have in Canada.

A Prime Minister really only has a few core responsibilities, one of which is to keep Canadians safe. We know the Prime Minister has miserably failed on this. Violent crime is surging, people are out on parole five minutes after they have committed a crime. That has been an abject failure.

The other very important thing is to maintain the trading relationship with the United States. Once again, the Liberal Prime Minister has been an absolute failure and a disaster. We start with softwood lumber, it is still not resolved nine years later, tens of thousands of jobs have been lost, and billions of dollars worth of tariffs have been collected, to the detriment of Canadian workers and Canadian industry.

From there we fast-forward, to 2018, when the United States under then-President Trump, imposed 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum. Now, we have to ask ourselves, “Why did they impose those tariffs?” Well, it is actually pretty interesting because it was about the border.

In 2018, it was about the border, and in 2024, these proposed tariffs are about the border. History repeats itself when there is an incompetent government. The 232 tariffs were actually because Chinese steel and aluminum were coming into Canada and being diverted down into the United States, taking away American jobs and American steel production.

The Americans tried to warn us about this, repeatedly. I know this from my consultations with the steel and the aluminum industry. They were asking for Canada to come up with a way to deal with this, the anti-circumvention methods of bringing Chinese steel in through Canada and flooding into the United States.

Guess what. The incompetent Prime Minister and the incompetent Liberal government did absolutely nothing, despite repeated requests from the United States to clean up the border and stop allowing the steel to come in, so it imposed punishing 232 tariffs on Canadian industries. We lost jobs in our steel industry and lost jobs in our aluminum industry.

I know the government will say it brought tariffs in against the United States, etc., but the whole thing could have been avoided if it had not so incompetently managed the relationship with our largest trading partner. Because of how the government behaved, the United States put punishing tariffs on our steel and aluminum industry, which caused all kinds of damage.

Again, who are the ones that suffer from the Prime Minister's incompetence? It is not him. He continues to live his lavish lifestyle, but the workers, the unionized workers in particular, are the ones who suffer and lose their jobs when a Prime Minister so incompetently manages the largest trading relationship we have in our economy.

That is the interesting thing, that the 2018 tariffs were about a border issue. One would think that even a government as incompetent as the Liberal government would realize that maybe we should make sure we are taking care of our border with our largest trading partner and not treating it as an irritant, but the government does not. It just continues to bumble along and mismanage the relationship.

Where do we end up? We end up with a situation now where there is the potential of punishing 25% tariffs being levied against all goods coming into the United States. This would have an unbelievably devastating effect on the Canadian economy. One of the reasons, again, is the issues on the border.

Before I spoke tonight, I had the opportunity to watch a news report from a CBS affiliate in the United States. The report talked about 295 miles of border between Canada and the United States that encompasses New York, Vermont and New Hampshire, and said that the number of arrests that are being made by the U.S. border services is skyrocketing. Seven thousand people entered the United States illegally and were arrested in 2023, from just this 295-mile stretch of border. In 2024, according to the report I watched tonight, that number is up to 19,000. These are 19,000 arrests, not incidents, and according to the report as well, 321 of the people who were arrested out of those 19,000 were on a terror watch-list.

The Liberals mismanaged the border with respect to steel and aluminum, allowing Chinese products to come in, resulting in punishing 232 tariffs being slapped on Canadian steel and aluminum, which resulted in economic devastation in those industries. There were jobs lost by hard-working union members. I visited these members at steel plants across the country. They work hard. They lost their jobs because of government incompetence. Now they face the same reality because of how incompetently the Liberal government has mismanaged its relationship with our largest trading partner.

When we try to think about the effects of this, we have to think about the workers who are going to be affected. There is 93% of our auto manufacturing that goes to the United States, and 84% of our steel goes to the United States. When we look at unionized workers in the auto sector, the mining sector, forestry and oil and gas, 412,000 union jobs are at risk.

I do not know what the Liberals' approach is, other than incompetence, but we need a new approach. We need a Canada first approach.

U.S. Tariffs on Canadian Products November 26th, 2024

Madam Speaker, it is interesting that the member talked about the border and said that there is nothing to see here; everything is great. I was listening to a CBS News report from about a week ago, which talked about the border. A 295-mile part of the border between Canada and the United States includes New York, Vermont and New Hampshire. In 2023, 19,000 illegals were captured crossing that border, and 321 were on the United States terrorist watch-list. This is exactly the problem. The current government has been incompetent in managing our borders; this is why we are in the situation we are in.

Does the member want to comment on that failure?

U.S. Tariffs on Canadian Products November 26th, 2024

Mr. Speaker, it was interesting to listen to the member talk about the challenge we have with the potential of 25% tariffs being imposed on Canada, because it is kind of like Groundhog Day. The member might not know this, but in 2018, the United States slapped section 232 tariffs on Canada: 25% for steel and 10% for aluminum.

Some people may be wondering why I would bring this up. What does it have to do with 25% tariffs today? The real problem then was the border. Just as President-elect Trump has said, the problem now is the border. In 2018, Chinese steel was coming into Canada, going down into the United States and taking out American steel. It became such a problem that the then president of the United States imposed a 25% tariff. We are now going to have it on everything because of the complete mismanagement of the border yet again.

Why should Canadians trust the Liberals to get anything right when they have gotten everything wrong in this relationship?