House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • Her favourite word was respect.

Last in Parliament October 2019, as Conservative MP for Milton (Ontario)

Lost her last election, in 2019, with 36% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs has been absolutely essential for our ability to work with the community on the issues of first responders. They have attended our meetings. They have met with me on a one-on-one basis. They have met with my officials. They have met with my staff as well. Their input is invaluable. I thank them for it, and I am very pleased that they themselves ended up commending our government for requiring emergency response assistance plans for these shipments and that they feel we are listening to the public safety concerns of emergency responders.

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, at the beginning of the evening, a mere three hours ago, I gave the correct number when it came to the number of civil aviation oversight inspectors. I gave the incorrect number in the last round of questioning. I just want to make sure that for the purposes of the record, I am clear that in civil aviation the oversight positions numbers are 1137 and not what I said, which was the total number, 1707.

I thank the hon. member for catching me on that one and ensuring that we have the record sorted out, and I am delighted that he talked about a topic that is very important to us.

With regard to what happened in Lac-Mégantic, the first meeting I had was in Lac-Mégantic with the mayor of Lac-Mégantic, and from there I met the local mayors ten days later. The one thing that came out of it was the importance of understanding that first responders needed to have certain information and, second, that they needed to ensure that they had a communication line open with the rail companies in their area.

That is what we have been trying to do through our protective directives, the first one having to do with the information and the second one, which we just did, having to do with emergency preparedness along Canada's railway lines.

As the member pointed out, an ERAP, or emergency response assistance plan, is a formal plan. It is what industry says it will do to support first responders, the ones first on the scene in the event of an accident involving dangerous goods. Sometimes it requires special expertise and sometimes it requires special response equipment. An ERAP helps municipalities and local emergency responders by providing them with around-the-clock technical expertise and specifically trained and equipped emergency response personnel at the scene of an accident.

The ERAP describes specialized response capabilities and equipment that would be used to support response to incidents involving higher-risk dangerous goods. It addresses emergency preparedness, personnel training, response exercises, and equipment maintenance.

As the hon. member also pointed out, CANUTEC supports first responders as well. Transport Canada's 24-hour emergency centre is staffed with scientists who provide real-time information and emergency responses by the first responders following an accident or an incident, something which the municipalities told us they wanted to have.

Prior to my announcement on April 23, regulations required an ERAP for certain volatile refined fuels, such as gasoline or diesel, when there were a large number of cars in interconnected trains. The requirement did not apply to crude oil or if a smaller number of cars were transported.

ERAP requirements are now being expanded to include specific flammable liquids transported in large volumes by train. The protective directives that we put in place require shippers to develop these ERAPs for flammable liquids like crude oil, gasoline, diesel, aviation fuel, and ethanol. An ERAP is required even when it is just a single tank. I think that is an important specific issue with respect to how we are dealing with this matter.

Industry must submit the ERAP to Transport Canada for approval within 150 days, and we have set up a task force as well to facilitate even further more recommendations that may be made by the transportation of dangerous goods general policy advisory committee's emergency response working group.

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, one thing that has become clear is the reality that Transport Canada, its officials and ourselves need to work very hard to ensure that we are doing everything we can to respond to the Auditor General's report with respect to the implementation of SMS and the oversight activity. We will continue to do that.

As I have said, we will have 100% compliance in terms of training this spring with respect to that. Specifically the number of oversight positions and the amount of oversight in civil aviation is a significant number of positions. It is almost 1,800 positions in total. Civil aviation is 1,100 of that and the balance is made up of marine safety, rail safety, and transportation of dangerous goods.

It is incredibly important to note that safety and the safe passage of transport and passengers is always at the core of what Transport Canada does. That is what these inspectors do. We want them to work within the safety management systems because that has been indicated and in fact is the international standard and the one that we should be trying to achieve.

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, as I have indicated before, the 1:50 proposed ratio is one that is accepted by ICAO, it is one that is used in the U.S. and Europe. We are now currently in a process of determining whether we move from a 1:40 to a 1:50 flight attendant ratio.

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, as the hon. member knows, Aéroports de Montréal has a noise committee that is very engaged in the community with respect to the issues associated with it. I know that Nav Canada would be involved as well as airlines. Really that is the best discussion place for that to happen, within that community.

As I said, I encourage the independent body Aéroports de Montréal to continue its discussions with neighbours and communities with respect to the management of noise in the area. It is an important part of an airport and it is important that they have these discussions.

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, I will follow that up with my officials. I do not have that information right now.

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, again, this is really for the Aéroports de Montréal group to deal with because they are ones that have the responsibility for this terminal and for the decisions around this terminal. I would note that what they have said, that their decision was taken, was because of high maintenance costs, facilities were unfit for current commercial aviation needs, and the lack of economic viability for this terminal. That is what led them to make this decision, but as I said, I understand them having discussions with local mayors and I wish them the best in their discussions.

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, the Mirabel terminal is in the hands of the Aéroports de Montréal. It has been in its hands since the ground lease was given to it by Transport Canada. The property is owned by us, but airport officials can make the decisions with respect to the operation on their own. I understand the association officials have been having conversation with the local mayors. I encourage that, but at the end of the day, it is their decision on how to proceed with respect to this.

Since 2004, when passenger service ceased at Mirabel Airport, they have been attempting to utilize this asset and generate an economy from it, but have been unable to do so and have indicated that this is the direction they want to move in.

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, as I said, the one fundamental piece of being able to work on air side operations is that those workers have either gone through a screening process or they have a card that allows them to access those areas. That process is handled by Transport Canada. It is taken very seriously because it is a matter of security.

What the status of individuals is regarding the nature of their residency in Canada, I do not know what the particular aspects of it are. It is something that would be taken into consideration by officials and they would deal with it in the way in which they deal with all applications.

Business of Supply May 7th, 2014

Mr. Chair, with respect to people who work on the air side of airport of operations, they have to receive accreditation from Transport Canada through use of a card or they have to go through a screening process to get through. Those things are in place and they are part of our everyday lives in airports across Canada.