House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was need.

Last in Parliament September 2021, as Green MP for Nanaimo—Ladysmith (B.C.)

Lost his last election, in 2021, with 26% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Employment Insurance Act March 11th, 2021

Mr. Speaker, we are going to support Bill C-24 because it is important to help Canadians at this time.

I would like to know from the hon. member if he sees a need for permanent changes to improve the EI system and to create an independent fund that cannot be used as a slush fund by governments to pay down debt, to use against the deficit or other things, because this is an insurance program that workers and employers pay into. I would like to get his comments on whether he sees the need for those kinds of changes.

Employment Insurance Act March 11th, 2021

Mr. Speaker, EI reforms are long overdue. This is something we need to do, and to do permanently, not just temporarily.

Liberal and Conservative governments have used the EI fund as a surplus slush fund, and I am curious as to whether the member thinks the fund should be completely independent so that money paid into it by workers is insurance money that can only be used by workers. That way, we could expand programs and make them more accessible to all those who could really use help through EI.

Employment Insurance Act March 11th, 2021

Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for her speech.

My question relates back to the previous speaker and the need for a national strategy. Yesterday I was in debate with the parliamentary secretary for transport about what Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea have done to combat COVID-19 with a national strategy. His response was that the Liberals did not want to start a constitutional crisis.

Does the hon. member think that creating a national strategy to work with the provinces to achieve a common ground and a common strategy, rather than this piecemeal approach we have had, would cause a constitutional crisis? Does she think the Government of Quebec would work with the federal government to ensure we have protected our citizens?

Twenty-one thousand people have died. We have ruined our economy. We have spent hundreds of billions of dollars—

Health March 10th, 2021

Madam Speaker, the national strategy in Australia did not create a constitutional crisis there and I do not think it would cause a constitutional crisis here. It would have done us a lot of good.

When the pandemic was declared a year ago, the Green Party caucus made a series of recommendations to the government. We added to those recommendations as time went on and as we saw what other countries were doing successfully to combat the spread of COVID-19.

Successful countries have all had unified national strategies. There has been a lack of political courage to do what is necessary at the federal level in Canada. On both sides of the House, there is little appetite to do anything that might upset a premier, but a lack of a unified national COVID-19 strategy continues to have poor outcomes and hurts Canadians in a myriad of ways. We need stronger national coordination, and the sooner we start to do that, the better the results—

Health March 10th, 2021

Madam Speaker, I would like to start by recognizing the personal and economic sacrifices that Canadians have made during the pandemic. They have stayed home, they have followed public health orders and they have done everything in their power to flatten the curve and beat COVID-19.

Families across the country are grieving the 21,000 people who have died. Now, a year into the pandemic, Canadians are exhausted and frustrated. The repeated lockdowns and restrictions have taken a heavy toll. Small and medium-sized businesses are struggling to survive. Millions of people are experiencing financial hardship. Mental health challenges, drug overdoses and domestic violence have all increased.

Despite the sacrifices, COVID-19 is still spreading in our communities, and new variants are a growing concern. Canadians are looking at what is happening in other countries, and it is not lost on them that the strategy in Canada is not working. Inadequate coordination between federal, provincial and territorial responses has failed to stop the spread of the virus.

In countries such as New Zealand, Australia, Taiwan and South Korea, the spread of COVID-19 has been arrested, case levels are down, the death toll is much lower, economies are up and running, and people are going about their lives. What can Canada learn? Where did we go wrong? How can we move forward in a way that will result in less hardship for Canadians?

Countries that have eliminated the spread of the disease share these key aspects: they had a national strategy; they closed borders; they required quarantines for citizens returning from international locations; they limited internal travel within the country; they mandated masks for indoor public spaces; they tested and used contact tracing; they continue to use circuit-breaker lockdowns to quickly stop new outbreaks; and the health minister is in charge of vaccine procurement, not the industry minister.

The key to success was to isolate outbreaks and use multiple tools to limit the spread of the virus. These are actions that Green Party MPs advocated for in the early days of the pandemic. Instead of a well-coordinated national strategy, Canadians have had a patchwork of provincial health orders that were often contradictory and confusing. In some cases, COVID-19-related decisions appeared to be driven by politics instead of science.

I appreciate the fact that the government organized an intergovernmental coordinating committee with medical health officers from across the country, but we needed more than a committee. We needed more than a patchwork of confusing protocols and mandates that changed from province to province.

Canada is a federation, and it is true that provinces have jurisdiction over health care. I understand that the federal government is reluctant to use its emergency powers to create and enforce a national strategy. Some provincial governments have at times politicized this pandemic, and such actions have been detrimental to Canadians.

Australia is also a federation with jurisdictional and political differences between the national and state governments, but they worked together successfully in a coordinated effort to stop the spread of COVID-19. The population there is much better off for that co-operation.

The vaccines are finally rolling out across the country, but with the spread of new variants, it is not certain how effective the vaccines will prove to be. We need to be prepared to stop the spread of variants that may be vaccine-resistant.

We are not out of the woods yet, and a lack of national coordination can still have dire consequences.

Petitions March 10th, 2021

Madam Speaker, the second petition outlines a long series of human rights abuses sanctioned and perpetrated by officials of the Chinese Communist Party.

The petitioners urge the Government of Canada to deploy all legal sanctions against these perpetrators under the Magnitsky act, including freezing assets and barring entry to Canada.

Petitions March 10th, 2021

Madam Speaker, I have two petitions that I am tabling today. Both are initiated and signed by constituents in Nanaimo—Ladysmith.

In the first petition, the petitioners note that almost all community drinking watersheds on the east coast of Vancouver Island are privately owned because of the E&N land grant, which was part of the agreement to bring B.C. into Confederation 150 years ago. They point out that the E&N land grant violated aboriginal rights and title. They also observe there is a high risk of drinking water contamination due to industrial and human activity in these watersheds.

The petitioners call on the government to work with first nations, all levels of government and private land owners to begin the process of bringing these community drinking watersheds under public ownership and control to maintain a secure source of clean drinking water for future generations.

Canada—United Kingdom Trade Continuity Agreement Implementation Act March 9th, 2021

Mr. Speaker, the hon. member is really well versed in these trade issues. I agree with him on so many points, in particular the need for a sunset clause.

I looked at a lot of the transcripts, but I was there for one of the witnesses from the manufacturing sector who said that Canada's manufacturing base has been hollowed out. We are not getting the exports into the EU, but we are exporting a lot of raw resources. That is one of the things we did not like about CETA.

What are some of the things that the hon. member does not like about the CETA that he does not want to see carry on with this agreement?

Business of Supply March 9th, 2021

Madam Speaker, I was particularly interested in the section of the member's speech about affordable housing and how Vancouver had become one of the most expensive places to live in Canada.

I would note that it was during the Conservative government's time that tax loopholes and the use of real estate as a tax haven and as a place to launder money drove up real estate prices in Vancouver, and we are feeling it here in my riding of Nanaimo—Ladysmith. We also have predatory investors who are investing in affordable housing through real estate investment trusts that pay a very low tax rate.

Does the hon. member think we need more regulation in the housing market? Does he think we should have rent and vacancy—

Business of Supply March 9th, 2021

Madam Speaker, there are many areas in which the government has helped people in dealing with COVID-19, and as an opposition member, I have contributed to pushing the government to do the right thing.

One thing I like about this motion is that it adds restrictions on executive compensation. It does not go far enough in terms of restrictions on shareholder compensation and shareholder dividends. We have seen how the big three telecom companies have taken almost half a billion dollars in wage subsidies. Imperial Oil has taken money and private long-term care homes have taken millions of dollars and then paid out shareholder dividends.

I would like to ask the hon. member if he learned anything from what the Conservatives did with the GM bailout. They lost hundreds of millions of dollars and did not have any rules or any kind of package to keep GM in the country, so GM closed its plants and left. Is the government—