House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was report.

Last in Parliament March 2011, as Liberal MP for Kingston and the Islands (Ontario)

Won his last election, in 2008, with 39% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Supply May 3rd, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I was astounded to hear the hon. member's speech. I thought I was listening to something in 1790. This is 1994, I should remind the hon. member. We are in the 1990s. It has been 200 years since the people he quoted wrote what they wrote. I think he quoted Locke and Paine. Old Tom Paine has been dead about 200 years as I recall, the hon. member can correct me. What he wrote was relevant in his day, but surely to goodness this is grossly antiquated at this point in time. Things have changed.

When I was a student of politics I remember reading Tom Paine and some of Locke's stuff. It was regarded as dated then and that was 25 or 30 years ago. I think the hon. member really ought to update his authorities and come up with something of the late 20th century in which we now live. To go back and quote these people as a basis for saying that we are now half slaves is frankly unbelievable and unacceptable.

I noted the hon. member in his speech did not mention a thing about the benefits we get with the taxes we pay. This is something that members of the Reform Party seem to forget with monotonous regularity. They harp about government programs that are wasteful. He referred to grants to artists and to the National Action Committee on the Status of Women as examples of grants he thought were wastes of money. However he never told us where the cuts were going to come. If we cut those grants, whether it be the grants to artists or grants to the national action committee, we would not save very much money and he knows that.

What he really is talking about is cutting off the poorest of the poor at the bottom of our social ladder and telling them: "You people will have to make do on your own. We are going back to 17th century living where the poor get their money from a church or some other charitable organization and nothing whatever from the government".

Business Of The House May 3rd, 1994

The standing orders would require that the notice of the amendments be given on the day after the report. So the report will be received on May 25 and presented in the House during Routine Proceedings that day. Obviously the notice of the amendments would have to be given before six o'clock that day to be considered the next day. Normally you have an extra day.

The Chair will have the amendments by six o'clock and will be able to work on its ruling overnight and communicate with the parties. If there are a lot of amendments it may mean an all-night work session for the Chair.

Business Of The House May 3rd, 1994

Madam Speaker, of course, when amendments are moved by any member in the House on this bill, they are considered by the Chair and the Speaker will decide at the beginning of the debate at report stage.

Regrettably, with this motion, we specified that the debate would begin 48 hours after the report, but we will have only 80

hours. So it will be a little harder for the Chair and also for members, but that is the arrangement we made.

The report from the committee will be received on May 25 and the debate will start on May 26. We have arranged for the debate to start on that day.

Those days have been designated because they are long days in order to give the opposition every opportunity to debate this bill on a reasonable basis. We could have the debate on a Friday but it is a short day. In order to lengthen the opportunities for the opposition, we have agreed to have the debate on the Thursday and Monday instead. That is the reason we have shortened the notice period for the report stage. However I think it is a reasonable compromise and that is the reason for it.

Business Of The House May 3rd, 1994

Madam Speaker, on a point of order. There should be more comments.

I heard an hon. member say he got along fine without me and I am glad to see him again too.

Madam Speaker, there have been discussions among the parties and I think you will find there is unanimous consent for the following motion:

That, notwithstanding any standing order:

The Standing Committee on Finance is instructed to report Bill C-17, an act to amend certain statutes to implement provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 22, 1994, no later than May 25, 1994;

The report stage of the said bill shall be on May 26 and May 30, 1994 and at 15 minutes before the expiry of the time allotted for government business on May 30, 1994 the Speaker shall put all questions necessary to dispose of the report stage of the said bill without further debate and any divisions necessary shall be taken immediately;

The third reading stage of the said bill shall be on May 31, 1994 and at 15 minutes before the expiry of the time allotted for government business on May 31, 1994 the Speaker shall put all questions necessary to dispose of the third reading stage of the said bill without further debate and any divisions necessary shall be taken immediately.

Order In Council Appointments May 3rd, 1994

Madam Speaker, I have the honour to table, in both official languages, a number of order in council appointments made by the government.

Pursuant to Standing Order 110(1), these are deemed referred to the appropriate standing committees, a list of which is attached.

Canadian National Railways April 15th, 1994

Madam Speaker, the speech of the opposition House leader was so interesting that I felt I had to add a few words.

The hon. member forgot something. I remember quite well that during a by election in the Lac-Saint-Jean region a few years ago, the Conservative government spent $143 million to help elect the present opposition leader as member for Lac-Saint-Jean. Why did the hon. member not ask him to be generous with this project, to be its benefactor in return for all the money that was spent?

Really the money was spent. They should have named this project as one of the things they spent the money on instead of spending it on all of the other projects.

The hon. member knows his leader got this money to get him elected into this House. They spent $143 million on one byelection in one riding. It is an extraordinary confession when he comes to this House pleading for more money for his riding when all that money was spent in that area just to get his leader elected and he did not get him to do it.

Questions On The Order Paper April 15th, 1994

Madam Speaker, I ask that the remaining questions be allowed to stand.

Questions On The Order Paper April 15th, 1994

Madam Speaker, the following questions will be answered today: Nos 6, 14 and 15.

Question No. 6-

Business Of The House April 15th, 1994

Madam Speaker, I think you will find there is unanimous consent for the following motion:

That, any division or divisions on matters relating to government legislation requested this day be deferred to Tuesday, April 19, 1994 at 5.30 p.m.

(Motion agreed to.)

Committees Of The House April 15th, 1994

Madam Speaker, if the House gives its consent, I move that the 16th report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs presented to the House earlier this day be concurred in.

(Motion agreed to.)