Simon Marcil

[International Trade, October 15th, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, who would have thought Coca-Cola would be selling us milk? Multinationals like Coke will be competing with our dairy farmers. That is what it has come to.

Can Coca-Cola be trusted to meet our quality standards? Honestly, nobody in Quebec is going to want to serve that disgusting stuff to their family.

Does the government realize that what Quebeckers want to buy is milk produced in Quebec by people from Quebec?

[International Trade, October 1st, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, a year ago almost to the day the House unanimously called on the government to ensure that there would be no breaches in supply management if a new NAFTA deal were reached.

Instead of telling the Americans that Parliament had agreed no concessions would be made, the government gave up its negotiating power, contradicted the House, reneged on its word and completely caved.

Knowing that Donald Trump's threats were nothing but hot air because Congress did not support tearing up NAFTA, why did the government once again sacrifice Quebec?

[International Trade, September 24th, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, a Toronto newspaper reported last week that Canada is prepared to make significant concessions on supply management, but only after the Quebec election of October 1.

The Prime Minister is afraid to go against the consensus in Quebec because he is abandoning producers. He himself told Americans that he was flexible on supply management.

My question is simple: does Canada have a nasty surprise for Quebeckers the day after the election?

[Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation Act, September 18th, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, I thank my esteemed colleague for his speech. We are all familiar with this government's tendency to get involved in conflicts of interest, much like its predecessor. That is why I suspect it has other reasons for wanting the ratify the TPP quickly. I have a two-part question for my colleague.

First, does he really think that adding the word “progressive” to the name of the agreement is a sign of social progress?

Second, who does he think stands to benefit financially when the Liberals rush passage of this agreement, as they did with cannabis legalization?

[Criminal Code, June 11th, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, we agree to apply the vote and we will vote yes.

[National Security Act, 2017, June 11th, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the vote and will be voting no.

[Impact Assessment Act, June 11th, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the vote and will vote no.

[Impact Assessment Act, June 11th, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the vote and will vote yes.

[Impact Assessment Act, June 11th, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the vote and will vote yes.

[Impact Assessment Act, June 11th, 2018]

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the vote and will vote yes.