Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 46
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Red Tape Reduction Act  It sounds so simplistic, but what it speaks to is incompetence, the incompetence of the ministers in the various departments who are not overseeing the regulations right now. They think the Muskoka minister is somehow going to be able to handle the thousands and thousands of regulations, and we should trust him to cut through this. Folks back home will remember that the Muskoka minister was the man who took $50 million in border infrastructure money, when he had only won by 14 votes, and blew it on pork barrel projects of zero significance.

February 3rd, 2015House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Parliament of Canada Act  We found out that the minister had come up with his own homemade forms. It was like the Muskoka minister saying to people to fill it out and they might get a free set of Muskoka steak knives at the end of it. If not, at least a sunken boat would be raised, they would get a lighthouse and a lake would built be in a place where there were a thousand lakes.

November 18th, 2014House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Northwest Territories Devolution Act  I want to go back to the lakes and rivers, and the importance of it. Our friend, the Muskoka minister, who blew the ring of fire, was the man who allowed Vale and Xstrata to take control of the two greatest mining companies that Canada has produced, the international giants, Inco and Falconbridge.

December 5th, 2013House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Economic Action Plan 2013 Act No. 2  We would have taken it away from the potential political interference that goes on with funds that are not clearly and carefully delegated to the right areas. Did the government not learn anything from the Muskoka minister's gazebo scandal? Did it not learn anything about the importance of dealing with funds in a non-partial, careful fashion so that the precise purpose of what these funds are developed for is implemented?

October 29th, 2013House debate

Dennis BevingtonNDP

The Environment  We could set up a new bill perhaps called the “Goldie Hawn property preservation act”. Even better, we could call it “protecting millionaire buddies of the Muskoka minister so he can get re-elected act”. How about some navigation there?

October 30th, 2012House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, the Muskoka minister made sure that his lakes and rivers were protected in the budget, just not other important waterways that support recreation and fishing. The Bowmanville Creek in the riding of Durham is a great example.

November 8th, 2012House debate

Dan HarrisNDP

The Environment  The reason the Conservatives are trying to kill any scrutiny of this omnibus bill is that they do not want Canadians to know they are stripping protection from 99.7% of Canada's lakes and rivers, and the remaining 0.3% are in Tory ridings, which brings us to the Muskoka minister. Will he explain to us why the property values of the uber-rich cottagers in his riding merit protection, while the rest of Canadians are being tossed overboard?

October 31st, 2012House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

G8 Summit  Mr. Speaker, it is now 130 days since the Muskoka minister took a dive on accountability of the G8 slush fund. We now know that Huntsville was green-lighted to blow $30 million in federal money without tenders. We now know that the Muskoka minister got a job for his buddy.

October 17th, 2011House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Copyright Modernization Act  However, the image that one of our Conservative members claimed, of Canada being a pirate haven as though it were Yemen or North Korea, comes from the diplomatic cables of the former industry minister, the famous Muskoka minister, who, when staff were meeting in Washington, said to put us on the piracy watch list because it would help us. Imagine a government whose idea of trade is to have this made up and have Canada treated as an international outlaw in order to help the government pass its legislation.

June 15th, 2012House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

G8 Summit  Mr. Speaker, the problem is that yesterday the Muskoka minister presented a defence based on the claim that 242 pet projects magically became 32 pork projects, without any paper trail and without any involvement by him whatsoever. However, on April 20, 2009, the town of Gravenhurst stated that it was told by the Muskoka minister to "remove the centennial project from the G8 fund and he would find the money elsewhere".

November 3rd, 2011House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

G8 Summit  Speaker, the member has done, after 145 days, an excellent job of imitating the President of the Treasury Board but, unfortunately, it was the Muskoka minister who made the promise to get the money. It was the Muskoka minister who said that he would go around the spending processes. If the government is to have any transparency and credibility left, I would ask the Minister of Foreign Affairs if he would push his colleague to stand up and take accountability for what he pulled off in Huntsville.

November 1st, 2011House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Ministerial Expenditures  It is not like we are asking them to take public transit. Let us look at what they spent at Davos. The Muskoka minister racked up $8,000 on a limo that sat idle. We are not asking him to hitchhike. We are not asking him to turn back the gazebo. I will give him the receipts if he did not look at them.

June 6th, 2012House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Ministerial Expenditures  Speaker, obviously we have touched a nerve here, because the Minister of Finance, the Muskoka minister, and the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, the three musketeers, have the nerve to preach austerity while whooping it up like royalty off the taxpayers. Will one of those men do the right thing?

June 5th, 2012House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

G8 Summit  Speaker, if the big game hunter on the backbenches is going to take down this scandal, he is going to have to put a little more ammunition in his pop gun. The facts are that since the Muskoka minister has to hide behind members like him to answer, I will do him a favour and I will speak for the Muskoka minister. He said “If set up a parallel process where the Auditor General did not know, I would be resigning right now and turning myself in to the local police”.

October 26th, 2011House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Points of Order  I also hope that my colleague opposite would encourage some of his members who use demeaning comments like Muskoka minister et cetera in their comments, and share that with caucus. We will do the same.

May 17th, 2012House debate

Michelle RempelConservative