Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1486-1500 of 1574
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, all the reports confirm that the government has made up its mind to buy the Super Hornet. The only thing left to do is to find some red lipstick to put on the pig to make this thing presentable. This is very typical of the Liberals. The minister says that no decision has been made and that information is being gathered in order to make the best choice for the Canadian Forces.

June 9th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, the more time goes by, the more the decision to buy the Super Hornet makes no sense. Retired Colonel George Petrolekas does not see the point in buying the Super Hornets as a short-term measure. It will take two or three years just to get the aircraft. Why not immediately launch an open and transparent process to find a replacement for the CF-18s?

June 9th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my esteemed colleague for his question. All of humanity's problems must be resolved as quickly and efficiently as possible. Today, the House is seized with a motion concerning a particular problem, namely ISIL actions against minorities, such as the Yazidis, in Iraq and Syria.

June 9th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for his question. At this time we are not debating what was not done previously. Genocide is an action that begins at a certain point, continues, and must be stopped. Today's motion simply asks the House to acknowledge that this is genocide.

June 9th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague from South Surrey—White Rock. I want to start by commending my colleague from Parry Sound—Muskoka and the House Leader of the Official Opposition for the excellent work they are doing on this issue. It is important to note what we are talking about here.

June 9th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, the government is inventing a crisis that does not exist in order to acquire Super Hornet fighters. The only ones who are talking about a capability gap are the minister and the parliamentary secretary. I would like to remind members that on April 14, in committee, General Hood said, “We have enough trained personnel; we have enough aircraft and enough maintenance people...and we have the money...to operate.”

June 8th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, the National Post quoted a former Royal Canadian Air Force officer and pilot who contradicted the government's claims. He says that there is no reason to rush to replace the CF-18s and purchase the Super Hornet. There is enough time to hold an open competition to choose the best aircraft to replace our CF-18s.

June 8th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, the only gap here is on the government benches. The government seems to be suffering from an imaginary problem. Among their many gaps, the Liberals have a capability gap. On April 14, General Hood, Commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force, said that the CF-18s' useful life had been extended to 2025.

June 7th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, the capability gap was created in collaboration with lobbyists. Since February, Boeing had 10 meetings with senior political staff. More than half of those meetings were with the senior policy adviser to the Minister of National Defence and the Prime Minister. That many meetings with the same group smells fishy to me.

June 7th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, the current fleet of CF-18s has been refurbished to last until 2025, which is enough time to transition to the next fighter jet. The urgency the Liberals are describing seems to have been invented specifically to give the Prime Minister an excuse not to purchase the F-35.

June 6th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, senior officials have confirmed that the Liberal government has already decided to purchase F-18 Super Hornets. Before making the announcement, the Liberals just have to finalize the narrative to justify this purchase. Although they promised to hold an open, transparent competition, the result has already been decided: another broken Liberal promise.

June 6th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

Normandy Landing  Mr. Speaker, June 6, 1944, D-Day, was a pivotal day in human history, known as the longest day. That day, nearly 150,000 American, British, French, and Canadian soldiers stormed the Atlantic Wall in Normandy to free Europe from Nazi oppression. Over 14,000 Canadian heroes from all over the country took part in the Normandy landing, and 355 of them gave their lives.

June 6th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, first it was U.S. Army officers, now it is the commander of the Canadian special operations forces who is confirming that our troops are on the front lines near Mosul. Brigadier General Rouleau says that the troops spend 20% of their time on the front lines. The Prime Minister kept telling Canadians that this was just a training mission for Iraqi troops.

June 2nd, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, by withdrawing our CF-18s in order to keep an election promise, the Liberals are putting our soldiers' lives at risk, even more so now that we are on the front line of the offensive in Fallujah. Officers with the U.S. Army have confirmed that our special forces are on the front line.

May 30th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, the government is putting the lives of our soldiers in Iraq at risk by publishing photos of their faces. The minister does not think that there was anything wrong with publishing the photos because the defence staff approved it. However, in the same type of photos authorized by the same defence staff a year earlier, the soldiers' faces were blurred out.

May 17th, 2016House debate

Pierre Paul-HusConservative