Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1576-1590 of 1681
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Speech From The Throne  The government must be more aggressive in pursuing these subsidies. For example, the collective buying power of free trading nations should and could be used to push the protectionist countries back to the bargaining table. Where is the government in terms of trying to organize that? As I visit farmers from coast to coast, too many have told me that they do not know if they can survive the winter.

January 31st, 2001House debate

Stockwell DayCanadian Alliance

Canada-Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the sentiments of my Bluenose colleague about the benefits that can flow from free trade. Free trade is not meant in any way to benefit one region over another. It is, as he would be the first to admit, something that has national benefits. This is comprehensive legislation.

September 28th, 2001House debate

Peter MacKayProgressive Conservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to take part in this debate and to follow my colleague from Nova Scotia, who is a diligent defender of the military, as is the mover of the motion, the member for Saint John. She has consistently and persistently been a champion for the men and women of the Canadian armed forces.

November 4th, 2002House debate

Peter MacKayProgressive Conservative

Health Care System  Public studies have shown that private for profit health care is more expensive, inequitable and unaccountable than any public system. The Kirby report ignored the threat international trade deals pose to our public medicare. The report approved private for profit ownership of care but ignored the far reaching and adverse implications of this under the North American Free Trade Agreement and other trade deals.

October 30th, 2002House debate

Wendy LillNDP

Supply  Mr. Speaker, first let me congratulate the hon. member for Saint John for her tireless efforts in support of our men and women who are currently in the military, as well as our veterans corps and the reservists. For as long as I have known the hon. member, previously when she was the mayor of her town and now as the member of Parliament representing her area, she has stood up valiantly and courageously for the men and women of the military.

November 4th, 2002House debate

Peter StofferNDP

Code of Conduct  Mr. Speaker, like other members who have spoken previously, it is with some reluctance that I stand to speak about the issue of ethics here in the House, given the sad spectacle that we have seen in the last number of weeks and months, I would suggest, and some might argue we could go right back to the beginning in 1993.

June 20th, 2002House debate

Peter MacKayProgressive Conservative

Softwood Lumber  Mr. Speaker, the United States has formally filed a countervailing duties application to seek tariffs of up to 40% on Canadian softwood lumber. This would cost Canadian producers $4 billion per year. Having had years to prepare, the Liberal government has again been caught flatfooted with 45 days to go, only now realizing that a common, uniform trade policy for softwood lumber is not possible as regional circumstances are too different.

April 2nd, 2001House debate

Peter MacKayProgressive Conservative

Speech From The Throne  However, it has made Canadian companies a bargain for American investors. Former Alberta Premier Peter Lougheed has expressed concern about Canada's sovereignty since the signing of NAFTA. In conclusion, I would say that globalization is extremely important. With the summit of free trade of the Americas coming pretty soon, even the president of the United States is very keen to promote free trade, the issues and challenges of globalization must advance.

February 6th, 2001House debate

Deepak ObhraiCanadian Alliance

Prebudget Consultations  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to speak on the prebudget debate. Much of the debate this afternoon has been laced with a great deal of cynicism and there is a reason for that. My colleague from Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca and my colleague from Wild Rose gave voice to the frustration that is felt not only by members of the opposition but by many Canadians, given the government's record of spending, mismanagement and corruption.

December 10th, 2002House debate

Peter MacKayProgressive Conservative

Prebudget Consultations  Mr. Speaker, I listened with great interest to some of the constructive suggestions brought forward by my friend across the way. I know that he has consistently been a person of compassion and one who looks for answers. I want to come back to the issue of priorities and integrity within the government.

December 10th, 2002House debate

Peter MacKayProgressive Conservative

Summit Of The Americas  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the views of the member from Kootenay when he speaks of getting together with a group of parliamentarians, not necessarily from the House but maybe from provincial legislatures and from other democracies around the world as well, to discuss these issues on a continuous basis to see where they can be changed.

March 27th, 2001House debate

Peter StofferNDP

Kyoto Protocol  Mr. Speaker, it is that type of minutia that the government is asking Canadians to do. It is asking them to fix their homes so they are more energy efficient. They are asking them to drive less. They are asking them potentially to take on all of the costs of Kyoto and the provinces are concerned about what the impact would actually be.

December 2nd, 2002House debate

Peter MacKayProgressive Conservative

Kyoto Protocol  Mr. Speaker, speaking of inconsistent and disingenuous positions being taken, I know that we are all waiting with bated breath to hear from the hon. member for LaSalle—Émard. An article today, which I would call an exposé, called “The evolution of a parliamentarian”, outlines in great detail the positions that were taken by the hon. member for LaSalle—Émard while in opposition.

December 2nd, 2002House debate

Peter MacKayProgressive Conservative

Supply  Wait for it. Not only has it been federal policy since 1987 to oppose bulk removal of water by tanker, diversion or other interbasin transfer. Our provincial partners have or have been developing similar policies or legislation to protect our natural waters from commercialization beyond current usage.

February 9th, 1999House debate

Julian ReedLiberal

Summit Of The Americas  Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to note that the member for Medicine Hat and the member for Fraser Valley, both of the Reform Party, get very afraid when the New Democrats and their leader stand up for the environment and human rights. They get very frightened of that because they do not understand the issues.

March 27th, 2001House debate

Peter StofferNDP