Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 151-165 of 2675
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Aerospace Industry  Mr. Speaker, Canadians were shocked last week to find out that after receiving hundreds of millions in government funding, Bombardier executives were ready to pocket $32.6 million in bonuses, $32.6 million U.S. What was the Prime Minister's reaction to all this? Well, he said he “respects the free market and the choices that companies make..”.

April 3rd, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Accountability  Mr. Speaker, the same Liberals who regularly attacked Stephen Harper for his use of the gag are now flat out resorting to the guillotine to shut down debate. Amending the rules that govern how our democracy works should never be done by just one party, no matter the party. Thus, will the Liberal government commit, here and now, to not changing the rules unilaterally, yes or no?

March 23rd, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

The Budget  Mr. Speaker, the budget has clearly laid bare the Liberal government’s choices. While, exactly two weeks ago, the Liberals voted to close the tax loophole for CEOs, they did not do so in their budget. No, instead they scrapped the public transit tax credit and cut $1.25 billion from the fund to combat climate change.

March 23rd, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

The Budget  Mr. Speaker, closing the CEO stock option tax loophole would have generated $725 million every year, and as a bonus it would have helped the Liberals keep one of their promises. What a concept that is. Instead, what the Liberals are doing is they are refusing to give $155 million to finally end discrimination against first nations children.

March 23rd, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Accountability  Mr. Speaker, sunny ways are indeed gone. They have been replaced by an attempt to unilaterally and quietly ram through changes to the rules that govern our democracy. This is nothing less than a massive government power grab, which is only meant to help the Prime Minister avoid accountability.

March 23rd, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, my question is simple. In the Prime Minister's opinion, what would be an appropriate penalty for ministers who violate the Conflict of Interest Act?

March 22nd, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Accountability  Mr. Speaker, with answers like that, we really could replace him with a cardboard cutout, and his peanut gallery would never notice the difference. If the Prime Minister was serious when he said that he wanted to work with the other parties, will he agree to set up a proportional committee where no party can impose changes solely to their own advantage?

March 22nd, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, when a minister breaches that trust, what is the penalty? Instead of going around in circles, the Prime Minister would do well to respond soon. To be clear, Canadians believe that there is no problem with the Prime Minister taking a vacation, but Canadians do have a problem with the Prime Minister accepting illegal gifts, breaking the law, and then charging the taxpayers over $125,000.

March 22nd, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Accountability  Mr. Speaker, as is often the case, we did not actually get an answer to the question asked by the Leader of the Opposition. The Prime Minister is going further than Stephen Harper would have ever dared to do in telling Canadians he only wants to show up in question period once a week.

March 22nd, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Infrastructure  Mr. Speaker, yesterday the Prime Minister conveniently forgot to mention that his platform promise does not look anything like the privatization bank he is now proposing. In fact, the word “privatization” does not ever appear in the Liberal campaign platform. Neither do “user fees”, “tolls”, or “private profit on public property”.

March 21st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Taxation  Mr. Speaker, here is something that did appear in the Liberal campaign platform: “set a cap on how much can be claimed through the stock option deduction”. We know a little about that, because it was actually in our platform long before the Liberals discovered it. Tomorrow the Liberals have an opportunity to put the interests of every Canadian above those of wealthy insiders.

March 21st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Justice  Mr. Speaker, the NDP voted for increasing taxes on the wealthiest Canadians, but he is right, we did oppose a plan that did nothing to help the middle class. This morning, the government dropped gangsterism, trafficking, importation of narcotics, weapons possession, kidnapping and other charges against 36 individuals arrested during a major anti-mafia sweep.

March 21st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Small Business  Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister really likes slogans and sound bites, such as the one about 2015 being the last election under the current system. I see this is still a sore point for the Prime Minister, but what happened to his promise to cut small business taxes? Well, in committee, his minister responsible for small business said that this promise was, and I quote, a sound bite to get elected.

March 21st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Finance  The truth is that he is fighting first nations children in court, Mr. Speaker. That is what he is doing. The Liberals also promised that they would put an end to the tax loophole involving stock options for CEOs, which benefits only the rich. Two weeks ago, the Liberals voted for an NDP motion that specifically called for that loophole to be ended.

March 20th, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Infrastructure  Mr. Speaker, the Liberals' plan for infrastructure includes a massive privatization bank that could double the cost of infrastructure to Canadian taxpayers. Their plan also seems to include the privatization of Canadian airports. I am wondering if the Prime Minister could show Canadians exactly where in the Liberal election platform this was ever mentioned.

March 20th, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP