Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 211-225 of 308
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Job Losses in the Energy Sector  Mr. Speaker, I am a little confused because I am hearing that the member opposite wants the government to get out of the way, yet wants it to pre-approve a pipeline. I do not see how that is getting out of the way. I do not know how pre-approving pipelines, undermining the regulatory system, and having no action on environmental policies gets a pipeline built.

February 8th, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Job Losses in the Energy Sector  Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague for sharing that, and for reading it with such passion. It is important to recognize, and I think we all have in the House tonight, that we all feel the job losses. It has touched everyone of us in some way. I have friends in Ontario who went out to work in the oil sector in Alberta for about 10 years.

February 8th, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Job Losses in the Energy Sector  Mr. Speaker, as I have been taking notes tonight and listening intently, I have heard a lot about refining this evening. I know I am changing the topic slightly, but I would like to share this with the House. As I was writing it down, I thought it was important. We have to remember that Canada is a net exporter of refined petroleum products, and we have not talked about that tonight.

February 8th, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we in this House feel for people who have lost their jobs in the downturn of the energy sector particularly. The low commodity price of oil has affected tens of thousands of jobs across the country. We will continue to work with the modernization of the National Energy Board to create a better system that will have the confidence of Canadians, and get Canadians back to work.

February 3rd, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, I agree with my colleague opposite that the forestry sector is indeed a very important part of our economy. I want to say that we are focused on supporting middle-class Canadians and their families at every stage of their lives. Not only did the Conservatives vote against the Paris Agreement, but when it comes to middle-class Canadians, they opposed our government's reducing taxes for nine million Canadians and a Canada child benefit that helps nine out of 10 Canadian families and will help raise 300,000 children out of poverty.

February 2nd, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, our government is committed to creating a cleaner, more innovative economy that reduces emissions and protects our environment, all while getting our natural resources to market through pipeline approvals and while creating well-paying jobs for the middle class and those working hard to join it.

February 2nd, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Transportation  Mr. Speaker, our government continues to support innovation around things like electric charging stations and electric vehicles. Indeed, I personally had the opportunity to test drive an electric vehicle while I attended the conference in Montreal. We know they are the next version of some of the energy saving opportunities we have around carbon, reducing our carbon footprint.

February 2nd, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the signatories in my riding of Northumberland—Peterborough South, I am pleased to present a petition requesting the enabling of a network of community-operated media centres to facilitate access to community television in small communities.

February 1st, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, our government is committed to an open, fair, inclusive, and transparent process for decisions on major energy projects. Consistent with our campaign commitment, we have established an expert panel to conduct a review of the National Energy Board's structure, role, and mandate.

January 31st, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we believe that this project must be subject to a review process that instils confidence in Canadians. We recognize that the new energy east review panel has decided to restart the project review process.

January 31st, 2017House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Youth  Mr. Speaker, by approving these pipelines, Canada took a step forward in supporting thousands of good, middle-class, good-paying jobs. Unlike the previous government, which failed to get any real action over the past decade, we are protecting oceans and we are pricing carbon pollution, all while finding new markets for our resources.

December 5th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Public Safety  Mr. Speaker, the right to peaceful protest is a foundation of our rights and freedoms in Canada. As a government, we respect that right. We confirmed that in our election platform. As the Prime Minister has said, we would not have approved these projects if they did not meet the highest standards of environmental protection and did not carry the support of Canadians.

December 5th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, as we have said many times, our government believes that major projects must be reviewed by a process that carries the confidence of Canadians. The National Energy Board process to review the energy east project continues. This week, Canada took a step forward in creating thousands of good-paying jobs for Canadians.

December 2nd, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Indigenous Affairs  Mr. Speaker, unlike the previous government that had a history of failing to engage with our indigenous communities, our government is committed to a nation-to-nation relationship. The fact is, indigenous communities signed benefit agreements worth over $300 million on this project and we are providing more than $64 million for an indigenous advisory and monitoring committee to oversee operations.

December 2nd, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, some members of the House believe the answer is the Leap Manifesto, and the only choice for the future is to leave it in the ground. Others believe that the NDP should stand with Canadians trying to get back to work. These projects will create thousands of well-paying, middle-class jobs.

December 1st, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal