Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 226-240 of 308
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has said that: ...one of the great things about Canada is people are more than free to express their opinions, to express their disappointment with governments in peaceful ways and we expect them and encourage them to [do so]. There are passionate voices on all sides of these decisions.

December 1st, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, Canadians have clearly told us the environment and the economy must go hand in hand. That is why our government has done the hard work to price carbon pollution, to protect our oceans and coastlines, and put in place world-leading safety standards for pipelines. Our announcement yesterday will create thousands of good, middle-class jobs, and generate billions of dollars for our economy.

November 30th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, yesterday Canada took a step forward in supporting thousands of well-paying middle-class jobs. Our government had taken concrete actions to protect our coasts. It put a price on pollution, while finding new markets for our resources. However, do not take my word for this.

November 30th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, no relationship is more important to our government than the one with indigenous peoples. We are committed to a renewed nation-to-nation relationship based on recognition of rights, respect, co-operation, and partnership. We have had the opportunity to meet many of the indigenous chiefs, including in the Lower Mainland, affected by these projects to hear their concerns first hand.

November 30th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, the TMX and Line 3 projects received government approval because they met our standards on the environment, but not all pipelines meet these strict criteria. The Government of Canada has directed the National Energy Board to dismiss the application for the northern gateway pipeline.

November 30th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, as we have said, we accomplished more in one year than they did in a decade. We listened to Canadians about how the environment and the economy go hand in hand—

November 30th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, these projects will create 22,000 direct, good-paying jobs for Canadians, including Albertans, and generate billions of dollars for our economy. On this side of the House, we are supporting Canadian workers, and I encourage members opposite to join us.

November 30th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, Canadians know that strong action on the environment is good for our economy. It makes us more competitive, fosters innovation, and reduces pollution. With the approval of these projects and with our announcement of the tanker moratorium, we are moving in the right direction.

November 30th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, our government understands the importance of the energy sector to our economy and to the livelihoods of Canadians. We have been clear that natural resources projects must go forward in an environmentally sustainable manner. The government's final decision on each major resource project will be informed by facts and evidence, including public consultation and the traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples.

November 25th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, Canada's relationship with the United States always has been, and always will be, one of the country's most important ones. We will continue to work with our continental partners to build a North American energy partnership that will benefit all countries for years and generations to come.

November 14th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, our government believes in developing resources sustainably through a process that carries the confidence of Canadians. The United States, indeed, has its own process by which it determines whether energy projects serve its national interests. The proponent, or the company in this case, must work with the incoming administration to get its project approved.

November 14th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, one of our core responsibilities as government is to help get our natural resources to market sustainably. The only way to do that is to restore trust in the way we evaluate our major resource projects. During the 2015 election, we committed to modernizing the National Energy Board, and we have just appointed a panel that will do just that.

November 14th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, the amount provided to the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador is a commercial loan. Like the Province of Quebec, we recognize the importance of clean energy in the fight against climate change. We are pleased to work with the provinces on energy files.

November 4th, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate that the member opposite expects that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission operate in the best interests of Canadians. I want to repeat and reassure all Canadians that our government believes the health and safety of Canadians is the single most important consideration related to activities of the nuclear industry in Canada.

November 3rd, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague, the member for South Okanagan—West Kootenay, for his work and contribution on the natural resources committee. Canadians rightly expect that our government place the highest priority on health, safety, and security as they relate to the nuclear industry in Canada.

November 3rd, 2016House debate

Kim RuddLiberal