Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 241-255 of 389
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Petitions  Committing 1,000 soldiers to a training program still presents a danger to our troops and an unnecessary expense when a country is faced with a $56 billion deficit. The military mission has cost Canadians more than $18 billion so far, money that could have been used to improve health care and seniors' pensions right here in Canada. In fact, polls show that a clear majority do not want Canada's military presence to continue after the scheduled removal date of July 2011.

December 2nd, 2010House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act  Starting with my first point, this is a government of shockingly bad wastage of public funds and mismanagement. Of course we have heard already from many of the speakers about the record $56 billion deficit. Having been part of a provincial government wrestling down a deficit, which was in place when the government I was part of came in and took responsibility, I know how difficult it is to reduce deficits.

November 30th, 2010House debate

Joyce MurrayLiberal

Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act  We were going to end our involvement there, but at the end of the day we find out it was the Liberal Party that was the conduit for getting this deal put in place to extend a training mission for two years at a cost of another $2 billion. This is when the country is running a $56 billion deficit. We have already spent $18 billion on this war, which has lasted almost 10 years. Now the LIberals have gotten into bed with the government to facilitate once again something that even they did not think they could—

November 30th, 2010House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act  I recognize the strategy of the government is to marshal its resources in such a way as to give it maximum possibilities for a majority government at some time. We in opposition know that the cupboard is bare, that the Conservatives are running a $56 billion deficit right now. The projections for the future are pretty bleak, and not only will they not be paying down the deficit anytime soon, they will be adding to it and accumulating an even bigger deficit in the long run to offer the Canadian people enough incentive to vote Conservative in the next election.

November 30th, 2010House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act  This is the finance minister who said there would be no deficit and then missed every deficit target he ever set, finally, recently, giving Canadians a $56 billion deficit, the biggest deficit in Canadian history. This is the same finance minister who lectures Canadian families about what he calls “risky spending schemes” instead of lecturing his justice minister and his public safety minister on their risky spending schemes.

November 30th, 2010House debate

Scott BrisonLiberal

Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act  At this time of the year, the Conservatives are saying it is going to be about another $55 billion or $56 billion, for a total deficit of about $110 billion. It is unheard of. All the average Canadian has to do is go back a short 16 or 17 years and he or she will realize that our deficit was $42.3 billion.

November 30th, 2010House debate

John CannisLiberal

Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act  First, let us look at why he has no money left. The government has created the single biggest deficit in Canadian history at $56 billion. We already know that the $6 billion annually for additional corporate tax cuts had a great deal to do with that, yet the finance minister insists on continuing them despite the fact that our corporate tax rates are already lower than those of our biggest competitor, namely the U.S.

November 30th, 2010House debate

Chris CharltonNDP

Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act  Madam Speaker, Canadians have a right to be concerned, if not outraged, as their salaries over the last year or so have been frozen or reduced to pay for the $56 billion deficit that the government has run up. Meanwhile, while all this is happening, bank profits hit $15.9 billion in 2009, at a time when we have a recession. Also corporate taxes are dropping to 15%, which will put them far below that of the United States.

November 30th, 2010House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

Petitions  Committing 1,000 soldiers to a training mission still presents a danger to our troops and an unnecessary expense when our country is faced with a $56 billion deficit. The military mission has cost Canadians more than $18 billion so far, money that could have been used to improve health care and seniors' pensions right here in Canada. The polls show that a clear majority of Canadians do not want Canada's military presence to continue after the scheduled removal date of July 2011.

November 30th, 2010House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act  Even at the height of the economic downturn, when Canadians were drowning in debt, the Conservatives continued their trend of risky spending schemes by tripling the advertising budget to a whopping $130 million, with no clear benefit or value to Canadians, a $130 million of taxpayer dollars for Conservative propaganda. The borrow and spend government added to its record $56 billion deficit by wasting $130 million on shiny billboards and flashy ads, while Canadian families struggled through the recession. It is time that Canada's money went toward Canadian priorities instead of Conservative propaganda.

November 29th, 2010House debate

Geoff ReganLiberal

Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act  Under the Conservative government, Canada holds the largest deficit in Canadian history, at $56 billion. The Conservative spending that led to the deficit is exactly the kind of risky spending Canadians cannot afford. In October 2008 the finance minister said, “At a time of global economic uncertainty, no responsible economic manager would suggest experimenting with...massive increases in government spending”.

November 29th, 2010House debate

Geoff ReganLiberal

Petitions  Committing a thousand troops to a training mission still presents a danger to our troops and an unnecessary expense. Our country is faced with a $56 billion deficit, and the military mission has cost Canadians more than $18 billion so far. This money could have been used to improve health care and seniors pensions right here in Canada.

November 29th, 2010House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

Petitions  Committing 1,000 soldiers to a training mission still presents a danger to the troops and an unnecessary expense when our country is faced with a $56 billion deficit. The military mission has cost Canadians more than $18 billion so far, money that could have been used to improve health care and seniors' pensions right here in Canada. Polls show clearly that a majority of Canadians do not want Canada's military presence to continue after the scheduled removal date of July 2011.

November 26th, 2010House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

Petitions  Committing 1,000 soldiers to a training mission still presents a danger to our troops and an unnecessary expense when our country is faced with a $56 billion deficit. The military mission has cost Canadians more than $18 billion so far, money that could have been used to improve health care and seniors' pensions right here in Canada. Polls show that a clear majority do not want Canada's military presence to continue after the scheduled removal date of July 2011.

November 25th, 2010House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

House debate  I would like the hon. member to explain to us how the money spent on tablecloths, glasses, dishes and a theme pavilion relates to security. I do not really see the connection. Canada currently has $56 billion in debt, which the Parliamentary Budget Officer determined could not be paid off until 2015-2016. I am of the opinion that the parliamentary secretary should consider the much more conservative position that the Minister of Public Safety and his associates were taking before they came to power.

November 24th, 2010House debate

Raymonde FolcoLiberal