Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 2566-2580 of 2675
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety  Mr. Speaker, in the Kanesatake matter, a mere forensic audit will simply not suffice. Last night, Radio-Canada reported that the Liberal government engaged in shameless interference in the 2004 election in Kanesatake and that these irregularities resulted in the tragic events that we are all familiar with.

April 17th, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Public Safety  Mr. Speaker, that is not enough. The documents obtained by Radio-Canada clearly show that the use of all this police force was unjustified. On its own, the police intervention teleguided by Ottawa cost $900,000. But since the crisis, Quebec has spent over $30 million on security at Kanesatake, and the SQ patrols continue to cost $300,000 a month.

April 17th, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Criminal Code  Mr. Speaker, I was referring to the remarks made by one of his colleagues that made the headlines last week. And I am not talking about the remarks made by his colleague when he interrupted me in the House, but the clearly homophobic remarks that his other colleague made several years ago.

April 16th, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Criminal Code  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to speak on behalf of the NDP about Bill C-384, put forward by my colleague from Châteauguay—Saint-Constant. The purpose of this bill is to improve and update existing provisions of the Criminal Code. These provisions already state that if an act is committed against a place of worship, the penalty can be increased.

April 16th, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2008  Every single one of them.

April 3rd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2008  Mr. Speaker, I think that some of the people who have been listening to this debate might have a little bit of trouble following so I will try to put things in perspective. The member who just spoke did back a bill on registered education savings plans. We in the NDP did indeed vote for it but it would not have been our first choice of a way of proceeding because we think it is important to help all families.

April 3rd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2008  Mr. Speaker, does that mean you are going to vote against the bill because all these issues are that important? We are proposing an amendment that would take all of that out, so are you going to vote with us and against the government's bill? Is that what the Liberals are going to do?

April 3rd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2008  Mr. Speaker, I can inform my colleague that of the examples he gave us, the Kelowna accord, for example, was an idea that was 13 years late. The Liberals were there for 13 years. They did nothing. On the eve of an election, they said they were going to do something. Let us look at what they did on climate change.

April 3rd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2008  Mr. Speaker, the fact of the matter is that Louis-Gilles Francoeur of Le Devoir summarized it best with an article entitled “La déviance canadienne”, or in English, “The Canadian deviance”. The environment minister's picture went with the article. Mr. Francoeur explained exactly what is wrong with the Conservative approach.

April 3rd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2008  Mr. Speaker, I will begin by asking for the consent of this House to share my time with the member for Trinity—Spadina.

April 3rd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2008  Mr. Speaker, some of our colleagues have said they would indeed like to hear from her, and rightfully so, because the budget implementation bill before us today contains very important provisions that would drastically change Canada's immigration system. And my colleague, the opposition critic for immigration, will have some very important things to say on this.

April 3rd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, first of all, I would like to say to my colleague for Toronto Centre that he obviously had difficulty understanding the quote he read earlier, and therefore I will explain it. I was speaking against subsidies to corporations. In his day, they were called corporate welfare bums.

April 2nd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I imagine the hon. member will be quite pleased to tell all the employees at Trenton Car Works that he agrees with the Conservatives' budgetary choices. There are a number of companies in his province that are suffering in exactly the same way other companies in Quebec and Ontario are.

April 2nd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Business of Supply  That is what those birdbrains in the Liberal Party of Canada want to support. They want to support the Conservatives. They are against families. They are against social programs. They are against social justice. They have no vision. They have no convictions. They do not believe in anything.

April 2nd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I hope you will give me as much time to answer the hon. member's question as you gave him to ask it. I will answer in English for my colleague from Edmonton—Sherwood Park. If he were a Liberal and not a Conservative, I guess the member would say that he is from Sherwood forest, because the Liberals love branding themselves as Robin Hood trying to help the poor, but the actual fact is that the Liberals do not believe in anything.

April 2nd, 2008House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP