Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 271-285 of 321
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Bill C-18 committee  I'm not talking about what the Wheat Board did, Mr. Vos.

November 2nd, 2011Committee meeting

Frank ValerioteLiberal

Bill C-18 committee  Can you tell me the number of farmers that voted Conservative who understood they would have an opportunity to vote under section 47.1 of the Wheat Board legislation?

November 2nd, 2011Committee meeting

Frank ValerioteLiberal

Fair Representation Act  I move that it be an instruction to the legislative committee on Bill C-18 that the committee postpone clause-by-clause review of Bill C-18 in order to permit the legislative committee to travel throughout Canadian Wheat Board designated areas in western Canada for the purpose of meeting with experts and farmers who would be affected by Bill C-18; and that in relation to its study of Bill C-18, the chair and 12 members of the legislative committee be authorized to travel in western Canada from November 14, 2011 to November 18, 2011, and that the necessary staff accompany the committee.

November 2nd, 2011House debate

Frank ValerioteLiberal

Bill C-18 committee  It simply says you have to have the application approved by the minister. This is a board. This is an interim Wheat Board, which is supposed to be for farmers and by farmers, and yet even to the last minute he thinks that he—or she, whoever it might be at the time—needs to somehow have some control over an application.

November 1st, 2011Committee meeting

Frank ValerioteLiberal

Ending the Long-gun Registry Act  I must confess that in the last few weeks leading up to Halloween and after, I feel like I have been participating in some kind of revenge of the Reform Party performance. The Wheat Board is gone and the gun registry is about to go. It is a strange form of triumphalism. My friend from Crowfoot is getting his exercise in applauding. What Canadians are looking for is public policy that is based on evidence, based on the facts, based on a reasonable assessment of risk.

November 1st, 2011House debate

Bob RaeLiberal

Canadian Wheat Board  Mr. Speaker, open democracy allows for proper debate and differing opinions. First the Conservative government ignored the farmer-held plebiscite favouring the single desk, then it refused to hold its own plebiscite, then it limited debate in the House on Bill C-18 to three days.

November 1st, 2011House debate

Frank ValerioteLiberal

Agriculture committee  No, we thought we were going to get the Wheat Board issue here, and it's not coming here. Growing Forward 2 is critical.

October 27th, 2011Committee meeting

Frank ValerioteLiberal

Ending the Long-gun Registry Act  This is now, as has been pointed out, the fifth time. The last time the government did it was on the Canadian Wheat Board and, within hours of the debate getting under way, moved time allocation. That was the first time that bill was actually being debated and those time constraints were instituted.

October 27th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Business of Supply  I do not understand why the member does not listen to what the wheat farmers are saying and support the Wheat Board.

October 25th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Business of Supply  We are asking the government to allow the vote that is specifically stated in section 47.1 so that if farmers wanted to organize themselves into a marketing unit to maximize their returns in the international marketplace, they could do it. It is unbelievable. The Minister of Agriculture has never done a tour of the Canadian Wheat Board, other than to drop in once for about 15 minutes to see its marketing intelligence, its war room, and how it gains those returns back to producers from the international market.

October 25th, 2011House debate

Wayne EasterLiberal

Business of Supply  I can tell my friend from Edmonton, having been out west four times now this year talking about this issue, that a lot of Conservative farmers approached me and said that they may have voted Conservative but that they did not vote Conservative for the purpose of dismantling the Wheat Board. I would remind the member that the word “wheat” did not show up in the Conservatives' platform during the election either.

October 25th, 2011House debate

Frank ValerioteLiberal

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for all the hard work he has been doing on the agriculture file, going across the country, working on committee and fighting for farmers and for reliable food production. It is very clear what the Conservatives are doing by dismantling the Wheat Board. However, what is also being exposed here is what they are planning on doing with the other marketing boards across the country, with the SM5. I think it will be blatantly clear what the United States, with its subsidized grains, will be doing with those SM5 marketing boards.

October 25th, 2011House debate

Mark EykingLiberal

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, our deepest concern is that at every trade negotiation the government will be asked to compromise and sacrifice the sanctity of supply management for the same reasons that it has been asked to dismantle the Wheat Board. It is only a matter of time before the supply managed poultry, eggs and dairy will be under the scalpel. There is no question of that. It is no surprise that there are so many agricultural publications out there now.

October 25th, 2011House debate

Frank ValerioteLiberal

Business of Supply  This was confirmed by conversations I have had with farmers who are in favour of scrapping the Wheat Board. The average age of farmers is 58 years old. Many farmers out west exceed that age and will be unable to make the transition. When their farms close, they will be sold, and not just to large agri-business.

October 25th, 2011House debate

Frank ValerioteLiberal

House debate  On Friday, questions about greenhouse gas emissions were met with a diatribe about shipbuilding, Supreme Court justices and the Wheat Board. We can and should be doing better in addressing the legitimate concerns of Canadians regarding environmental monitoring programs needed to protect health and safety. The known facts are that the scientists responsible for the ozonesonde network and the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre have received letters saying their jobs are in danger.

October 24th, 2011House debate

Kirsty DuncanLiberal