Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 271-285 of 424
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, during his speech, the member suggested that members from this side of the House had only put up examples coming from anonymous sources. That is not true. We spoke about retired Lieutenant-General William Carr, who said that the defence minister's search for recognition was a national embarrassment.

May 8th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, I would like the minister to answer my question. Ministerial responsibility is a longstanding political convention in our political system. Ministers are honour-bound to uphold such conventions, or else resign. From the outset, the Liberal government has repeatedly said that all that is required to end the crisis of confidence is an apology.

May 8th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Public Services and Procurement  Madam Speaker, the Liberal government has set up a task force to ponder the trials and tribulations of the Phoenix pay system. After a year, this is too little too late, and public servants themselves are the ones saying so. Contrary to what the Liberal government and the parliamentary secretary are claiming, there are still some public servants across this country who have not been paid for six months, including the Drouin family in Montreal.

May 5th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, Ubique Quo Fas et Gloria Ducunt. “Whither right and glory lead” is the motto of the 6th Field Artillery Regiment, where I had the honour of completing my formal military service. Non-commissioned members like myself follow orders not because we fear officers, but because these orders ensure the protection of the federation and the honour of our homeland.

May 2nd, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, I completely concur with my colleague's analysis. Not only is what he just said true, but, moreover, the government does not understand its role in the House of Commons. This document is peppered with words that should not be there. We see words that do not reflect the expectation, according to the Constitution and the British North America Act, for the House of Commons.

April 13th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, what I see in this discussion paper is an attempt to slowly but surely lead Canada toward a republican system. We would no longer have a Westminster system, but rather an executive that does whatever it wants, that is not accountable to anyone, and that is not responsible for its actions.

April 13th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, what the Liberals want is to make sure that Canadians have less of a voice in the House. Since the constitutional revolution of 1982, led by Pierre Elliott Trudeau, the Liberal Party has been trying to do away with the Westminster system. The Liberal Party's ultimate goal is to bring a republican system to Canada.

April 13th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. member for her question. I am glad she mentioned electronic voting. Although it might be the smallest proposed change in the discussion paper, I am strongly opposed to electronic voting. I am extremely proud to have to be present in the House. It is not a matter of personal pride.

April 13th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to take the floor today. I want to congratulate the hon. member for Beloeil—Chambly on his very fine speech. His bilingualism is second to none. There is no question that he honours the forefathers of the two founding peoples of Canada. My colleague from Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan has quite clearly explained the matter that I am addressing today.

April 13th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, the military see the truth. They see it on their paycheque at the end of the month. On April 6, the hon. member for Gatineau told me that I would get evidence of the capability gap that was cited as the reason for procuring the 18 Super Hornet jets without a bidding process.

April 13th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Questions Passed as Orders for Returns  With regard to Canadian Coast Guard fleets and the condition of Heavy and Medium Icebreakers, as well as High and Medium Endurance multi-tasked vessels: (a) what is the most recent assessment report and inspection detailing the condition of all fleets and what were the findings of the assessment and inspection; (b) what are the details of all comprehensive evaluations from the past five years detailing the condition of CCGS Tracy including the date of evaluation and the findings; (c) what are the reasons for placing CCGS Tracy on the auction website; (d) what are the names and titles of all officials who approved the decision in (c); (e) what are the reasons for the decision in (c); (f) what are all the details of the purchase and the purchaser for the auction of CCGS Tracy; and (g) what are the details of all notes, communications, and meeting minutes from all business relating to the National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy Secretariat (NSPSS) and Project Management Offices, including communications between Minister’s offices and the NSPSS with all stakeholders, outlining needs for capacity and services provided by the Canadian Coast Guard and fleets, including the (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) title and subject matter, (v) type of communication or document, (vi) file number, (vii) contents?

April 10th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Public Services and Procurement  Mr. Speaker, since Phoenix was introduced in February 2016, public servants from across the country and their families have been going through some very difficult times. Last week the Minister of Public Services and Procurement shockingly stated that she cannot reverse the decisions made by her deputy minister, specifically the decision regarding the $5 million in bonuses granted to department officials.

April 10th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Public Services and Procurement  Mr. Speaker, the Liberal government can no longer hide behind its senior officials when it comes to the Phoenix pay system fiasco. The Prime Minister himself repeated on several occasions that he wanted to solve the problems with the system as quickly as possible. On behalf of all the families who have been adversely affected by the problems with the system, I am asking the Prime Minister to immediately cancel the bonuses for the officials involved with Phoenix.

April 7th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Public Services and Procurement  Mr. Speaker, the parliamentary secretary mentioned an honest political disagreement between the two of us. That is indeed the case, but that is not what I am talking about. I would point out that Denmark was able to complete an open, transparent competition in 11 months. I am speaking to the parliamentary secretary, and it is not up to the Department of National Defence to answer me.

April 6th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative

Public Services and Procurement  Mr. Speaker, somebody needs to get the situation at Public Services and Procurement Canada under control yesterday. Just look at the outrageous bonuses paid to executives involved with the Phoenix fiasco in various capacities. I wish my colleague from Miramichi—Grand Lake were still here so I could tell him that the fact is, the Minister of Public Services and Procurement launched the Phoenix pay system on February 24, 2016.

April 6th, 2017House debate

Alupa ClarkeConservative