Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 156
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

The Budget  Speaker, there are serious gaps in this budget in terms of commitments to our country. One of the huge gaps that I see is in the area of Northern Ontario, where we have the Ring of Fire development. This development would be a transformative project for the economy of our entire region, not just in the coming years but in the coming generations. Indigenous communities living in dire poverty in the Ring of Fire region are looking to participate, but they need the infrastructure, the roads, the support to build a project that would transform our economy.

April 14th, 2016House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

The Budget  We would need another full day on that one and on the disastrous legacy of her government. The member's question was around the Ring of Fire and resource development. Once again, I look at programs like FedNor, FedDev, and some of the regional agencies, and they do have their place. These are important. For development in the north, I do not think there is anything more important than getting the Ring of Fire right.

April 12th, 2016House debate

Dean AllisonConservative

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  Speaker, thank you for giving me the opportunity to share my remarks. The numbers on the Ring of Fire speak for themselves. Analysis shows that within the first 10 years of its development, the Ring of Fire will make significant contributions to Canada's economy, and will sustain up to 5,000 full-time jobs annually, create more than $25 billion in economic activity, as well as generate more than $6 billion in government tax revenues.

December 7th, 2015House debate

Paul LefebvreLiberal

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  Since my husband works in one of those mines, I know how important natural resources are. First, why does my colleague think that there was no mention of the Ring of Fire in the throne speech? Second, when will we see some real action on the development of the Ring of Fire? Third, why is there no member of this government who is responsible for FedNor?

December 7th, 2015House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  We certainly hope the government will realize the importance of the Ring of Fire, as my colleague has just pointed out, and come up with a plan worthy of the name.

December 7th, 2015House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  In the Speech from the Throne, as well as in the letter to the Minister of Natural Resources, there was no mention of the Ring of Fire. Perhaps my esteemed leader could speak about the importance of the Ring of Fire and the economic impact that it will have on a variety of communities, especially first nations communities.

December 7th, 2015House debate

Carol HughesNDP

The Budget  All the resource shares go to Queen's Park in Ontario, and we get very little back from the Wynne government. There is no augmenting in the FedNor budget. Second, there is no action on the Ring of Fire. For the last 10 years, the Wynne government has sat on the sidelines. This project will bring generational economic change to all the regions and the indigenous communities of the north.

April 12th, 2016House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Fisheries and Oceans  Risk assessments are generally a simple calculation of two components: the magnitude of the potential loss and the probability that the loss will occur. The coast of British Columbia is on the ring of fire. Earthquakes happen frequently up and down the coast. Being prepared for the potential of a large earthquake and the resulting likelihood of a tsunami is part of our makeup. British Columbians know the probability of a tsunami.

February 25th, 2016House debate

Rachel BlaneyNDP

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  As the chair of Alberta caucus, which would be equivalent to what he is purporting to be for the Liberal caucus in northern Ontario, I wonder if he would agree that mining, in all of its forms, whether it is surface mining for oil sands or bitumen in northern Alberta, is every bit as economically valuable and important to all Canadians, not just first nation Canadians, such as the Fort McKay Band, which is one of the wealthiest first nations in this country because its proximity to that fantastic development. Also, is he not a little concerned that there is not a single mention of the Ring of Fire in the 15-minute Speech from the Throne, which could, and might, have been written by someone in a Grade 8 social class? Given that he is caucus chair for northern Ontario, is he not concerned that neither it nor its economic opportunities were mentioned once?

January 25th, 2016House debate

Blaine CalkinsConservative

Business of Supply  I look at Marten Falls and Webequie, which are not part of nutrition north. They do not have clean water, and they just happen to be in the heart of the Ring of Fire. I hear the government say how the Ring of Fire is going to be a great thing. We even had a minister for a while. I think the minister disappeared. I think we had two ministers. We were all going to benefit from the Ring of Fire.

June 4th, 2015House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Natural Resources  Speaker, that might be a question for the provincial legislature, but I will put it to my friend and colleague, Minister Gravelle, this afternoon, who I will be meeting with to hopefully talk about specific projects that pertain to the Ring of Fire. As I have reminded this place and my colleagues in Ontario, the building Canada fund announced in 2013 has the potential to support infrastructure funding for legacy resource development projects like the Ring of Fire.

January 27th, 2015House debate

Greg RickfordConservative

Citizen Consultation Preceding Natural Resource Development  However, the Conservative government wants to get things done in a year, a year and a half or two years at most. Here are the results: the Ring of Fire in northern Ontario has been rejected; the pipelines in northern British Columbia have been rejected; the pipelines that cross Quebec have been rejected; and the uranium mines have been rejected—and I hope they always will be.

March 27th, 2015House debate

Alain GiguèreNDP

Regional Economic Development  Let us be clear about that. We remain committed to supporting the province in its development of the Ring of Fire. Most recently, I was joined by my provincial counterpart at the world's largest mining conference in Toronto to announce a regional community corridor study in the Ring of Fire. This is a major step forward for first nations and for the region.

March 23rd, 2015House debate

Greg RickfordConservative

Citizen Consultation Preceding Natural Resource Development  At the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada's mega-convention earlier this year in Toronto, my leader made it clear that he supports the Ring of Fire project, if done this way. Our leader said: The Ring of Fire project is an important development for families in Northern Ontario today and for generations to come. Unfortunately, Conservative policies have undermined the government's ability to oversee that all social and environmental regulations are being fully understood and addressed.

November 21st, 2014House debate

Claude GravelleNDP

Yukon and Nunavut Regulatory Improvement Act  That is not a reasonable way to do development. I would like to point out, as well, that in my region we have the Ring of Fire. It is part of the great region of Timmins—James Bay. It is another incredible resource. The Ring of Fire is sitting there among some of the poorest fourth world communities. There is Webequie on one side, with Marten Falls and Ogoki Post on the other.

December 4th, 2014House debate

Charlie AngusNDP