Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 109
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Government Operations committee  I understand he testified to that. That's not what I told him. By the time he got to my office on April 9, the press were already reporting that she was resigning from cabinet. Mr. Snowdy asked me about that, and I told him all I could tell him was that I thought the Prime Minister was at the Vimy memorial that morning, so nothing was going to happen before that memorial was done.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  I didn't discuss them with Mr. Snowdy at that point, but in conversations with Mr. Snowdy, we did talk about her difficulties in the week leading up to April 9, that I just explained: the person from her office writing letters under a pseudonym, or anonymously, or whatever was done; the problems with her Elections Canada filing; and then obviously the mortgage issue and the way that, frankly, the Liberal Party jumped on that, quite likely inappropriately.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  That was the Monday before he testified. He and his lawyer, Mr. Groot, attended at my office.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  I think it was more for Mr. Groot's benefit. He wanted the benefit of my understanding of the way committees work, and so I answered Mr. Groot's questions. And then Mr. Snowdy, of course, had some new information for me at that meeting.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  Yes. In the context of our call, we reviewed those allegations, yes.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  I don't believe he was coming to me to learn any information from me. I was getting information from him.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  I wanted to learn all the facts that surrounded anything that might impact upon Ms. Guergis, yes.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  I don't believe I gave him that timeframe. He was asking questions to the effect of why certain things had not been done about demoting her, etc., earlier. I certainly was not in a position to answer those questions. That's not a decision the legal counsel of my client would presume to make.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  So I simply couldn't answer him on any suggestions or any questions he had in that vein.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  I think it calls into question her statements. But again, I don't want to get into who's lying, or making a subjective decision--

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  Yes. That's the testimony I mentioned earlier.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  Yes. I reviewed that.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton

Government Operations committee  It's definitely Ms. Dawson's, because she had the benefit of seeing the letter. Mr. Snowdy was going off a rendition that had been provided to him by another.

June 9th, 2010Committee meeting

Arthur Hamilton