Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 90
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  She doesn't know whether they've even left office. She doesn't know what they're doing, so the recommendations are generally that everyone should have to—

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  When they're leaving office, and then what they're doing through their entire cooling-off period so that she can tell them whether it complies or not with the conditions of the cooling-off period. But as Lori—

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  Sure, in a free and—

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  No, but it is done elsewhere. Again, Oliphant strongly recommended that the commissioner know and needs to be able to have approval because the cooling-off period is part of your public service. You're still covered by the act through that period. Also, some of the rules apply forever.

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  The Ethics Commissioner actually does address this area in her report. She says that essentially the gifts benefit rules should not be extended to cover what she views as a political interest as opposed to a personal interest. It's one of the major things the coalition disagrees with.

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  In that case, it's coherent with the earlier position that the Ethics Commissioner took, which is why she didn't look into the Calandra situation. If an MP filed a complaint with the commissioner about that situation, she would be forced to issue a ruling, and we'd know what she's thinking.

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  Well, I think it is far too harsh. An MP does not have the same decision-making power relations with the real decision-makers that a minister has, so he or she shouldn't have to sit out as long.

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  II would just say very briefly that the Oliphant commission has a lot on offers of employment as well, because it was a post-employment situation he was examining mainly. He has a lot of recommendations in that area also.

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  Also, where the brief aligns with her recommendations, her recommendations are mentioned in the brief specifically, indicating that aligning with what she says, we agree with that.

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  The Oliphant commission recommended an apparent conflict of interest rule be put into the act so there's the appearance standard. If you violated that standard, you would be in violation. That's the most important change.

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  No, she says it's in there already.

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher

Information & Ethics committee  Except for the few that I've mentioned today, and they're set out very clearly in the brief.... You'll see the ones on which we say not to do it, even though the commissioner is recommending it.

February 6th, 2013Committee meeting

Duff Conacher