Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Public Safety committee There's only one commissioner of firearms, but if you're referring to the chief firearms officers of each province, it depends on whether they're provincially or federally appointed, designated. If they are provincially designated, there are contribution agreements that are drafted and signed off on by the minister of the province and the federal minister.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee It depends, but this change is specifically to do with, if something happens through Parliament that changes the classification of a firearm—for example, makes it a prohibited firearm—then the registration certificate would automatically expire.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee When it's a registered firearm, the registrar will notify the licensee of the change of classification of their firearm.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee Yes, and by email if we have the email. We do that.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee It's still six months.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee Consistent application is always a concern, but we would clearly define standard operating procedures for everyone on how we envision it to operate.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee Currently, through a CFO, they do eligibility processes all the time, and I think given the circumstances of this it would trigger an eligibility review. Depending on the circumstances, they would most certainly, I would think in most cases, request or seek some input from their physician.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee It's part of our eligibility process now. It's a continuous eligibility process. If something comes up throughout a licence-holder's five years, it always triggers an eligibility process. A chief firearms officer will evaluate the information that's coming in. Sometimes it could be an interview with the person, or it could be going back to the individual and asking the physician to answer some questions.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee My understanding of this amendment is that they would self-declare, so that would trigger an eligibility process for sure. A CFO would review the situation when the individual requested the firearm back.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee Yes, we would actually add it to one of the forms.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee Of course, we haven't operationalized it yet, but I'm envisioning that is probably what would happen, because it would be part of that form. It would trigger that eligibility process and a review. The CFO could request that the individual seek a medical form to obtain the ATT to bring it back—the authorization to transport it back to their residence.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee It's temporary storage, so leaving the country, taking—
May 10th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette
Public Safety committee No, they do not have mental health as one of the selection criteria.
May 10th, 2023Committee meeting
Kellie Paquette