Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 251
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Accounts committee  It's made to help the entrepreneur get access to government contracting that would allow them to grow the company in whatever fashion they want.

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  That could be your interpretation, but it's not the reality. The reality is that there are a lot of government—

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  No, you weren't repeating what I just said. In the context of the PSIB, it's spread out across the entire country, and there are lots of people who are working within the framework of that. All of this—

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  My understanding of the value that you put out was $91 million. I've got it in front of me. It was from 2015 until now. At the same time, you can look at the PSAB and PSIB policies, and nowhere will it state—

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  Not much, to be honest with you. In the end, if you talk about what happened between Botler and GC, they could put anything on there as far as their experience is concerned. Our relationship is with GC and with the Crown, with CBSA, as our subcontractor.

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  Me personally, zero. I was at DND to—

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  My company, obviously. It was a JV, so we obviously had interaction with GC Strategies in performing the task authorization requirements, yes.

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  I'd have to check with our staff and ask them that. I'm not aware. Obviously they had to have some interaction between the task authorization request and our relationship with GC, but I'm not aware of the details of what they discussed as far as Botler is concerned.

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  Absolutely. That's why we're just as dismayed as everybody else as to why and how we could have gotten this information wrong.

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  I would expect that given our relationship as the prime to CBSA we would have staffed up the package for the task authorization to them as part of the requirements package. It would have gone on Dalian letterhead, but I'm not sure exactly what the interaction or documents or letterhead was between Botler and GC—

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  Again, I am not—

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  I can give you the process. I have never seen anything—

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  I understand what the process would be because I understand task authorizations, but I have not seen any of the paperwork personally.

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

Public Accounts committee  I can assume that, obviously, with us as the prime and giving the CBSA this documentation as part of the task authorization, it would have gone on Dalian letterhead—

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo

March 19th, 2024Committee meeting

David Yeo