Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee It could be two things. It could look at all the problems that are coming from administration and it could set up in the ombudsman's workhouse a system that would allow him to be able to tell us whether these complaints are justifiable or not. That's the way I would look at it, rather than having another committee.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee I have to say no. My strong belief on the matter is that the defence ombudsman has a set of rules under which he's operating, and that's it. With regard to keeping the two separate, it takes a long time to become familiar with our pension system. Once somebody is familiar with that, he should not have a foot in another camp.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee No, not at all. It's a question of keeping everything simple, above board, and non-political, if that's possible. That's not a criticism, of course. I would like to answer the question this way. After two years, Mr. Forbes and I began appearing before the Pension Review Board, not always with success, and we had to ask for interpretation hearings.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee Yes, that is correct.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee Yes. The 55 organizations represent approximately 400,000 traditional veterans.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee Yes. In fact, I couldn't have said it better myself.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee Yes, you would find parts of them that you would have to put together and make the jigsaw puzzle make some sense, because we looked at various ombudsmen. Basically, if you go to Mr. Garner's report, which I included, you would realize that in there is the situation we were faced with, and we're still faced with--that is, he really can't overstep.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee Naturally I think the level of comfort is very important. What I'm seeing is that if an ombudsman were to come about, then the two-year period would be very important. Having said that, is the ombudsman out there to make certain that the system is fair? What if you had a situation where the adjudicator had messed things up pretty badly, and the applicant was very unhappy?
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee Yes, terribly.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee Mr. Chairman, may I refer this case to Mr. Forbes, because he's the lawyer?
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee He's the one who is in close contact with the people, and he handles all those naughty cases for us.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee Absolutely.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton
Veterans Affairs committee I think the review would be primarily of the job the ombudsman was doing. If there were flaws in the system he would have to accept responsibility, and there would have to be another study to decide how it would go. The committee was so strong an alternative to the ombudsman because they said that veterans had had enough.
October 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
H. Chadderton