Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-22 of 22
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Health committee  Sure, but I'm not a medical doctor. The applications were all assessed, and there were strengths and weaknesses identified for all four applications. Some had different strengths and different weaknesses and some had more strengths and more weaknesses. That information was used as part of the overall assessment and review.

April 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Steven Sternthal

Health committee  No, there was no recommendation from the technical process.

April 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Steven Sternthal

Health committee  No, I am not aware of anything of that nature.

April 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Steven Sternthal

Health committee  Yes, there was one applicant who did submit additional information in the fall.

April 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Steven Sternthal

Health committee  This information was submitted at a time when the review was in its final stages of completion. There was an indication that a partner had changed for one of the applicants. It was not a substantive change to the application.

April 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Steven Sternthal

Health committee  That was identified around January 20 as being posted on our website. We were not aware of that until that time.

April 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Steven Sternthal

Health committee  The review process was completed, as Dr. Engelhardt said, only earlier this calendar year. We received the information from the single applicant, identifying that a partner on the application had changed, but the final decision was communicated publicly to the applicants on January 22 and then on our website on February 19.

April 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Steven Sternthal