Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee we're having on climate change. You yourself have said this is a grave and serious issue. Yet to make a statement in Nairobi and here in Canada, almost misleading Canadians to believe we're staying in a framework but not meeting the central piece of that framework, is intellectually
December 11th, 2006Committee meeting
Environment committee this. There were a number of programs that were across the government, but there was no coherent policy framework around climate change. Every—
December 11th, 2006Committee meeting
Rona AmbroseConservative
Environment committee problems on to future generations. It is voting against the statement that global climate change is one of the most serious threats facing humanity and Canada, and that it poses significant risks to our environment, economy, society and human health. It is voting against a whole set
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Pablo RodriguezLiberal
Environment committee with the climate change. If we want to discuss--not through Bill C-288--the accountability on the environment through the commissioner, that needs to be discussed thoroughly. On air pollution, we know that's a big, important issue for the health of Canadians. The quality of water and the land
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Mark WarawaConservative
Environment committee Are there any other comments on clause 9? (Clause 9 as amended agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4) (On clause 10—Review of Climate Change Plan and Minister’s statement)
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
The ChairConservative
Environment committee approach, will still do the Quebec industry well. If they're 7% below in all those things Mr. Bigras has said, then Quebec has nothing to worry about. As a concept, approaching climate change and greenhouse gas emission reductions by province opens this up. I'm not so sure about
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Environment committee the opportunity to lay out their own action plan on climate change. That way, we probably would not be imposing as strict rules on some industry sectors in Quebec, which have already reduced their emissions by 7 per cent; on the other hand, there would be stricter rules for other economic
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Bernard BigrasBloc
Environment committee It would be pretty clear that to support the Bloc amendment, because we believe that having a good plan in place regulating climate change is about having.... Then you get to the constitutional issues, the national—
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Maurice VellacottConservative
Environment committee Right. I appreciate his completion there. As I was saying before, we can't support this particular Bloc Québécois amendment, simply because regulating climate change is far too important. It's about having some national standards to ensure that all Canadians have the benefit
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Maurice VellacottConservative
Environment committee A recorded vote, please. (Clause 4 agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4) (On clause 5--Climate Change Plan)
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Mark WarawaConservative
Environment committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. Subclause 5(1) calls for the minister to prepare a climate change plan until 2013 that describes the measures Canada's taken to meet the Kyoto Protocol. In her September report and in testimony before this committee on October 3, the Commissioner
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Blaine CalkinsConservative
Environment committee this would have on the Canadian economy and on the environmental process. Our government's proposed legislation is simply a much better approach to Canada's making its contribution to addressing climate change in the short, medium, and long terms. Our plan will achieve concrete results
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Mark WarawaConservative
Environment committee Could we get started, please. Just for the record, pursuant to the order of reference of Wednesday, October 4, 2006, Bill C-288, An Act to ensure Canada meets its global climate change obligations under the Kyoto Protocol is the item for debate today. Pursuant to Standing
December 7th, 2006Committee meeting
The Chair Conservative
Environment committee CO2 is a greenhouse gas that can remain in the atmosphere for several decades. So, the climate change we are witnessing today is the result of the greenhouse gas emissions produced several decades ago. I want to repeat that I am not a scientist. On the other hand, I can tell
December 5th, 2006Committee meeting
Steven Guilbeault
Environment committee , and it's good research. I go back to my beginning. I have worked on climate change since 1989. I am old, and I am Canada's oldest, longest-standing advocate of market measures. We'll send another piece, which is the suite of measures we recommend. I'm arguing that this graph tells you
December 5th, 2006Committee meeting
Aldyen Donnelly