Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 3901-3915 of 4114
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Softwood Lumber  Mr. Speaker, the minister says this is a good deal for B.C. How would he know? He has not been seen in his riding in three months. We know what the Conservative strategy on softwood lumber is. It is to wave the white flag of surrender. The Conservatives surrendered $1 billion in illegally taken tariffs that the Americans keep as the proceeds of trade crime, surrendered Canada's dispute settlement rights, and surrendered the interests of every softwood community in Canada.

May 1st, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, there are two elements to this. One is the timelines that are set out for this summer. The whole issue of accountability is one of fundamental importance to the Canadian public. It is important that we proceed forthwith to put in place more accountability, to broaden the mandate of the Auditor General, to broaden the whole issue of access and transparency within our public administration.

April 27th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the hon. member for his question. As far as floor crossers are concerned, the Ethics Commissioner conducted a study on the number of members from each party who have crossed the floor of the House in 100 years and the NDP came in last. We have had six deserters in 100 years.

April 27th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise to speak to Bill C-2. There have been a number of very eloquent speakers from the New Democratic Party caucus, including the member for Trinity—Spadina. To start, it is important to go back to the 38th Parliament. In a sense, the roots of Bill C-2 come from the constant corruption that was exposed through the course of the 38th Parliament.

April 27th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Softwood Lumber  Mr. Speaker, I understand why the trade minister does not want to answer any questions on this. This deal stinks so bad that even the minister should run away from it. The minister sold out the voters of Vancouver Kingsway. He sold out British Columbians. Now he is in the process of selling out all Canadians.

April 27th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I agree with the point the member and many other Conservatives raised. It is important to end the culture of entitlement that existed under the Liberal Party in Ottawa. That is why Canadians voted, certainly for more Conservative MPs in this new Parliament, but also voted for more New Democratic Party MPs as well.

April 26th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Public Safety  Mr. Speaker, six months ago the House adopted the NDP motion for compensation benefits for the families of public safety officers, such as Canada's firefighters, over the strident opposition of the Liberal government. The House voted to support the families of those who give their lives to protect others.

April 25th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Softwood Lumber  Mr. Speaker, words are cheap. The Liberals used to give the same answer. I have another issue that may be another possible betrayal. Media reports are surfacing of a move to betray Canada's interests on softwood lumber. Canada won on NAFTA but the Bush administration refuses to honour that.

April 25th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  Mr. Speaker, I would like to congratulate the new member for Victoria on her speech. It was delivered very well and she spoke very directly about the British Columbian francophonie. As we know, British Columbia now has the fourth largest francophone presence in Canada, after Quebec, the Acadians, and Franco-Ontarians.

April 24th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Agriculture  Mr. Chair, I would like to congratulate you on your new appointment to this august body. I would also like to thank the parliamentary secretary for his intervention. Both he and the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food have been very available this evening. We appreciate that because this is an extremely important debate and these are important issues.

April 6th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Softwood Lumber  Mr. Speaker, last August Canada won on softwood lumber under binding dispute settlement. When the Bush administration in effect said it would not respect NAFTA, the former Liberal government did absolutely nothing to stand up for Canadian rights. One month ago, on the Prime Minister's watch, the U.S.

April 6th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Softwood Lumber  Mr. Speaker, it is nice to see the minister emerge from the witness protection program. I can see why the Conservatives took a Liberal to handle this file; there is no difference in policy. For Woodland Flooring in Comox, B.C., this bullying means a loss of 25% of sales. Giving away Canadian rights under NAFTA by trying to negotiate a side deal means the death of binding dispute settlement, and that opens every other industrial sector to the same kind of illegal actions.

April 6th, 2006House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Transportation Amendment Act  With pleasure, Mr. Speaker. I would be very pleased to address the concerns, but first, if the hon. member had actually listened, I mentioned three times what our position was on the bill and three times I think is enough. He can check the blues if he does not want to listen. It is funny because the hon. member who just spoke actually sees most of his federal riding now represented provincially by New Democrats.

November 28th, 2005House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Transportation Amendment Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for his comments around Terasen and the government's woeful neglect of due diligence, public process, and responding to the public need in the Terasen sell out. It is not just Terasen. Going beyond that, we have seen 11,000 takeovers of Canadian companies since the government came to power, each one of them rubber stamped.

November 28th, 2005House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Transportation Amendment Act  Mr. Speaker, it is with some frustration today that I rise to speak to Bill C-44, an act to amend the Canada Transportation Act. Members of the NDP caucus will be supporting referral to committee of Bill C-44, although, as I will enumerate throughout my presentation, we have serious concerns about certain aspects of this bill.

November 28th, 2005House debate

Peter JulianNDP