Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 142
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Ethics Counsellor  Mr. Speaker, I think we have to assess the premise of the hon. member's question for its factualness and its context. Generally when we check these things we find something missing in terms of language and in terms of context. It is very important to repeat what that the ethics counsellor told the Globe and Mail yesterday.

March 2nd, 2001House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Business Development Bank Of Canada  Mr. Speaker, I do not accept the premise of my hon. friend's question that the loan went through with lightning speed. I have been informed, however, that this loan was approved and participated in by the local caisse populaire and the Fonds des travailleurs du Quebec, both bodies not connected with the federal government nor with the Prime Minister, and their judgment was that the loan was a valid commercial transaction.

February 26th, 2001House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Business Development Bank Of Canada  Mr. Speaker, I reject completely the unwarranted premise of the hon. member's question. He really has a lot of nerve lecturing me about the law. Which law school did he ever graduate from?

February 22nd, 2001House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Ethics Counsellor  As I understand it, what was done to settle the debt in question was done in full consultation and with the agreement of the ethics counsellor. The hon. member's premise, as always, is totally wrong. He should do the House and the Canadian people a favour and withdraw his insinuations. Why not raise some questions of real interest to Canadians? Why is he not concerned about health?

February 14th, 2001House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Human Rights  Mr. Speaker, the assertions of the hon. member in his premise are absolutely wrong. The Prime Minister has spoken out vigorously on human rights in China during his current visit in his meetings with the Chinese premier. He will continue to do so and maintain this dialogue throughout his visit.

February 12th, 2001House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Ethics Counsellor  Mr. Speaker, I have to reject the premise of the hon. member's question. As I understand it, the ethics commissioner, Mr. Wilson, made some proposals, only, to the Prime Minister for his consideration. The Prime Minister has joined with business people from all over Canada on the team Canada mission to China.

February 9th, 2001House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Ethics Counsellor  Wilson, so there is no basis for that unwarranted slur on him now just because he has not turned into a tame tabby cat for the opposition. The premise of the question is wrong. The ethics counsellor did not find that the Prime Minister did anything wrong. It was just the opposite. He said the Prime Minister was doing what other people do as MPs in carrying out their jobs.

February 9th, 2001House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Lumber Industry  Speaker, I was not questioning any of my colleagues, I was questioning the Leader of the Opposition. I think I should do so again for the mistaken premise of his question. There is no threat or action on countervail against Canada on this matter. He is well ahead of himself on this subject. We are going to have useful and constructive discussions.

February 5th, 2001House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Cinar  Mr. Speaker, I categorically reject the ridiculous premises of the hon. member. The government is assuming its responsibilities in this situation, but the rules of parliament prevent us from commenting on an individual tax file.

February 2nd, 2001House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Government Grants  Mr. Speaker, there is an inaccurate and misleading premise to the question. The Prime Minister has no shares in the company in question. As the ethics commissioner told the parliamentary committee, “This is a done deal. It was over. There are no connections and no financial connections regarding the Prime Minister in either the auberge or the golf course”.

June 11th, 1999House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Minister Of Industry  I think the Alliance ought to have some modesty in trying to raise these kinds of questions without sound premises. By the way, so far the official opposition members have given the government a vote of confidence on its economic record and its economic policies, because they have not asked one question about the provisions of the economic update of the Minister of Finance.

October 20th, 2000House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Auditor General's Report  Mr. Speaker, I reject completely the totally unfounded premise of the hon. member's question. When it is a matter of trust, I suggest that whenever Canadians are asked to make their judgment at the ballot box they will agree that this government has earned the trust of Canadians, not only on its good record but its forward looking plan to bring Canadians successfully into the 21st century and not move them backward in a mean-spirited way as the Alliance would do in the unlikely event it was given the chance.

October 20th, 2000House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency  Mr. Speaker, as usual the premise to the hon. member's question is wrong. The minister is doing a terrific job for all Canadians. Why does the hon. member not explain that when his leader was a minister in the Alberta government he funnelled $8 million in assistance to businesses in his hometown of Red Deer over the last 10 years, including $55,000 for a muffin shop, $29,000 for a hair salon and nail service, and get this, $100,000 for an ice cream parlour.

October 6th, 2000House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Health  Mr. Speaker, I reject the premise and the innuendo of the hon. member's questions. They are both wrong. Speaking of taxpayers' money, taxpayers seem to be willing to pay for the nonsense the member expresses in her questions by paying her salary.

October 5th, 2000House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Aboriginal Affairs  Mr. Speaker, from my knowledge of the matter, the premise of the hon. leader's question is not accurate. I have been told that in at least 70% or more of the cases, the claimants are suing not just the federal government but they are also suing various churches directly.

October 5th, 2000House debate

Herb GrayLiberal