Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 56
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  I've not found that to be true.

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  Our preferred model is to lease all of the equipment systems to the agency and the agency actually does the monitoring. However, we do monitoring services for some of our customer agencies, including Florida and California, where all the alerts are processed automatically but ins

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  The equipment is all off-the-shelf computer equipment. You can access this data from any Internet-capable computer. Then, of course, it's data lines and phone lines. If you had your laptop and an Internet connection and you were an officer and you were at home, you could access

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  It's all done on secure lines, and we use secure sockets layer. We follow NIST standards. It is password-protected. We force the officers—they don't like us for it—to change their password every 90 days, and we shut down idle accounts.

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  There is no legal electronic device that interferes with our product. There has been a lot of talk about illegal GPS jammers recently. While we can't prevent the jamming of our device, we can detect and report the jamming of our device. If we suspect there is intentional jammin

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  We've not seen a significant problem. In fact, most of the problems we have seen have been officers who have gone out and acquired a jammer, simply to show us they can jam the device. But we haven't seen offenders routinely jamming the devices.

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  Yes. The jamming device is only a transmitter and one could monitor that. What we do is monitor the presence of jamming and we report that.

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  No. The device has automated communication in the event that the offender violates one of the conditions of his monitoring, so there's no intervention required. The device automatically calculates that and displays the message. We can send automated messages to the device from t

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  Being under house arrest is no walk in the park. There are a lot of rules with which an offender must comply, if a program is properly set up. If an offender complies with those rules—and typically in well-run programs we see less than one violation per offender per day—then the

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  If an offender is separated from the device after a very short period of time—and that time period is adjustable—the device sends out an alert. We call it a “bracelet gone” alert, both to the agency and also to the offender. The bracelet vibrates, alerting him to the fact he is o

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  This is actually a transceiver. The ankle bracelet sends out an encrypted RF signal once every 25 seconds and waits for a reply from the device, so it tethers him to the device. The BlackBerry device does all of the tracking, all of the communication, all of the processing of rul

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  If I said $1 a day, I misspoke. I thought I said roughly $5 to $10 a day. If I said $1 a day, I apologize to the committee. I certainly didn't mean to mislead you. The charge, again, depends on the level of service you want, but it's roughly $5 a day and from there additional s

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin

Public Safety committee  Yes, 3M does manufacture the device. The Pro Tech logo that you see on the device is my old company, and we're still in the process of transitioning the branding over from Pro Tech to 3M, but this is a 3M device and 3M is now the original equipment manufacturer of this device. Th

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Steve Chapin