Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 63
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Transport committee  I would suggest that Mr. Barsalou-Duval explain.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  If you want my interpretation on what the rule would then cover off—and I hope this is Mr. Barsalou-Duval's understanding as well—if we remove the text, as Mr. Bachrach suggested, "or any motion in amendment of a substantive motion", this would still cover situations in which the committee was in a portion of committee business and a member brought forward a motion that perhaps had not had the 48 hours' notice and had not been distributed beforehand.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  Once again, so that it's clear for me, that amendment by Mr. Bachrach to remove that language has been accepted?

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  I understand where we're at and I'll just put the vote to the committee.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  Again, this is the motion with regard to the testing of witnesses before they appear at committee. Would you like me to read the entire motion again?

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  (Motion as amended agreed to: yeas 11; nays 0 [See Minutes of Proceedings])

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  We'll go with the motion on translation: That all documents submitted for Committee business that do not come from a federal department or that have not been translated by the Translation Bureau be sent for prior linguistic review by the Translation Bureau before being distributed to members.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  I'm going to take it that the amendment was just adopted by unanimous consent.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  It reads: That the text of any substantive motion or any motion in amendment of a substantive motion be distributed in writing in both official languages to all Committee members before the Committee begins debate on such a motion.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  I think Mr. Kram's point was just which of the three motions we would designate as motion number one.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  It reads: That the clerk inform each witness who is to appear before the Committee that the House Administration support team must conduct technical tests to check the connectivity and the equipment used to ensure the best possible sound quality; and that the Chair advises the Committee, at the start of each meeting, of any witnesses who did not perform the required technical tests.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  It's my understanding that the sound quality is checked as part of the process for checking the witnesses' connectivity and sound quality.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Transport committee  Beginning with the testing of witnesses and the use of headsets and whatnot, our current practice is that all witnesses are tested before appearing at committee. We make every effort to make sure that every witness is provided with a headset. It's not always possible to get a witness a headset in time.

February 25th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

Transport committee  We can hear you fine. The sound seems to be fine for everyone else. It may be a connectivity issue on his end. We're having our technicians look into it. Just bear with us one moment, please.

February 16th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

Transport committee  The question is on the motion of Mrs. Kusie with regard to Keystone XL. (Motion negatived: nays 7; yeas 4)

February 2nd, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee