Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-39 of 39
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  That's correct.

April 30th, 2009Committee meeting

Prof. Neil Boyd

Justice committee  You certainly can't legalize. I think that's why it's fair to say it's a problem that requires a global solution. On the other hand, we can look around the world and see many countries that have decriminalized. There is a private member's bill. Keith Martin's bill is not very different from Bill C-17 of the previous Liberal government, which would have decriminalized the cultivation and possession of small amounts of marijuana.

April 30th, 2009Committee meeting

Prof. Neil Boyd

Justice committee  I think that's right. I don't think there's any way around that. I would make two points. One is that the Senate, with Pierre Claude Nolin and the report that came forward, made the point that you could have--and they did urge--very strong penalties around distribution to the United States.

April 30th, 2009Committee meeting

Prof. Neil Boyd

Justice committee  They are attempting to limit the amount that people can buy, and they have been doing that for about 10 to 15 years, largely because of concerns expressed by France and other European countries. But as you look around you, you see such a patchwork quilt of different approaches. In certain parts of Germany, for example, there is effectively decriminalization--you're allowed to possess, without penalty, up to a certain number of grams of the product--whereas in Bavaria, in another part of Germany, it's more of a criminal law prohibition approach.

April 30th, 2009Committee meeting

Prof. Neil Boyd

Justice committee  Thank you. The point about prohibition is that until 1967 we only had 1,000 convictions per year for possession, distribution, and cultivation of all illegal drugs combined. So one has to ask, why was it so different? Why, by 1976, did we have 40,000 convictions for marijuana possession alone?

April 30th, 2009Committee meeting

Prof. Neil Boyd

Justice committee  I'll be quick on that point. If you get Supreme Court decisions that document that certain groups are organized crime groups, that may settle the matter. On the other hand, as you know, you can get into a situation where groups change over time and what was once an organized crime group may not be an organized crime group at a future date.

April 30th, 2009Committee meeting

Prof. Neil Boyd

Justice committee  That's a tough question. On the one hand would be improved resources targeted at organized crime and improved prevention. I think the focus on penalties is misplaced. I don't think it's at all productive, ultimately, as we have very tough penalties in place. That's one side of the continuum.

April 30th, 2009Committee meeting

Prof. Neil Boyd

Justice committee  I'd say that these are both priorities. It's not a question of one being more important than the other.

April 30th, 2009Committee meeting

Prof. Neil Boyd

Justice committee  Good morning. Let me begin by saying that gangs and organized crime have been with us for at least 150 years—alienated and disfranchised young men finding a common bond of lawlessness, using crime as a lever for the creation of material wealth. Recall Daniel Day-Lewis in Gangs of New York, a reasonably accurate depiction of gang violence in New York City in the late 1860s, and then fast-forward to the streets of Vancouver, where, some 140 years later, there was almost a shooting a day until about three weeks ago.

April 30th, 2009Committee meeting

Professor Neil Boyd