Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 5476-5490 of 5956
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Election Financing  Mr. Speaker, Conservative candidates spent Conservative funds on Conservative advertising. They got financial assistance to do so from the national party. Elections Canada found out about this because we told it. Why would we not? After all, it is legal and all parties do it. Elections Canada singled us out, so we took it to took to court.

June 16th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, among the number of factual inaccuracies contained in the member's remarks was his discussion of filibusters at the ethics committees. In fact, it is the Liberal Party, along with the opposition, that is filibustering a parliamentary committee from investigating the question.

June 13th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, the Conservative candidates spent Conservative funds on Conservative advertising. Those funds were spent legitimately and under the law in a common practice that was done by all political parties. Elections Canada has failed to produce any evidence that our practices were any different than the other parties.

June 13th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Aboriginal Affairs  Mr. Speaker, I rise today to offer a full apology to aboriginal people, to the House and to all Canadians. Yesterday, on a day when the House and all Canadians were celebrating a new beginning, I made remarks that were hurtful and wrong. I accept responsibility for them, and I apologize.

June 12th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Leadership Campaign Financing  Mr. Speaker, the Liberal leader has now missed the deadline to pay off his leadership debts, which means that they are now illegal donations, unless, that is, Elections Canada has provided a special exemption. This raises questions. If the Liberal leader is too weak to manage his own finances, how could he possibly manage the country's finances?

June 4th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Points of Order  Mr. Speaker, it is important that somebody tell the truth about what the law says. It is clear in the Canada Elections Act that there is an 18 month repayment period for all loans that are taken out for leadership campaigns. That period starts from the time the leadership race ends, and therefore, June 3, this day, which happens to be my birthday, is also deadline day for the leader of the Liberal Party.

June 3rd, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, today we are calling on the Liberal leader to table in the House of Commons the special arrangement he is seeking with Elections Canada, including this. How much does he owe to the wealthy elites? What have the wealthy elites asked in return for their money? When will they be paid off?

June 3rd, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, if the Liberal leader does not repay his loans by the end of the business day today, in three hours, those loans become illegal donations over the contribution limit. A number of questions follow from that. First, if the Liberal leader is too weak to manage his own finances, how can he run the country?

June 3rd, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, I would like to present a petition on behalf of my constituent Dave Palmer, who is calling on the Government of Canada, in conjunction with the Governor General, to adopt a new volunteer service medal to recognize Canadian volunteer soldiers who are not eligible for past volunteer medals that have been created.

June 2nd, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, tomorrow is deadline day. The Liberal leader is said to have hundreds of thousands of dollars in outstanding leadership debts owed to the wealthy elites that control him. If he does not repay these debts by the June 3 deadline, they become illegal donations, over the contribution limit.

June 2nd, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Code of Conduct  Mr. Speaker, this government brought in the toughest anti-corruption law in Canadian history in the Federal Accountability Act, with great resistance from the Liberal side. We have an empowered registrar of lobbyists who is in charge of overseeing and regulating the lobbyist sector.

May 26th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, the Canada Elections Act says that all loans for leadership contestants must be repaid within 18 months and failure to do so is a violation of the act. The Liberal leader is said to have almost a million dollars in outstanding leadership debts, owed to wealthy elites and powerful insiders.

May 15th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, I have noticed for some time that the members across the way have been tense. As a result, I have developed a routine of reminding them of their own election practices. We all know what I am talking about: $5,000 in, $5,000 out; in, out. Where is Elections Canada? When I ask these questions, it is to remind them that what they did in the last election, just like what we did, is common practice.

May 14th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Terrorism  Mr. Speaker, Omar Khadr, believed terrorist and Taliban fighter, is charged with throwing a grenade and killing a medic. Fighting alongside the same Taliban terrorists that are killing our troops is an attack against us all. Now the Liberals want to bring Khadr to Canada. Yesterday a Liberal senator compared the Canadian government to al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

May 14th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, I guess that imitation is the highest form of flattery. On July 14, 2004, the Liberal Party made two transfers to the Rick Limoges local campaign for $4,000 and $5,000. One day later, the local campaign of Rick Limoges made two transfers back to the Liberal Party for $4,000 and then $5,000.

May 13th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative