Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 5491-5505 of 5956
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, on July 9, 2004, the Liberal Party made a transfer to the member for Don Valley West's local campaign for $5,000. One week later, the member for Don Valley West's local campaign made a transfer to the Liberal Party for $5,000: $5,000 in and $5,000 out. In, out, where is Elections Canada?

May 13th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, I have systematically demonstrated that the Liberals participated in a program of in and out. They did this to get around national spending limits and to amplify their taxpayer funded Elections Canada return. On July 8, 2004, the Liberal Party transferred to Beth Phinney's local campaign $5,000.

May 9th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, I will acknowledge that on July 21, 2004, the Liberal Party made a transfer to the local campaign of the member for Oak Ridges—Markham for $5,000. On August 6, 2004, the local campaign of the member for Oak Ridges—Markham made a transfer to the Liberal Party for $5,000.

May 9th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, I thank her for complimenting me on my youthful energy. On July 14, 2004 the Liberal Party made two transfers to Rick Limoges' local campaign for $4,000 and for $5,000. The next day, Rick Limoges' local campaign made two transfers back to the Liberal Party for $4,000 and $5,000.

May 7th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, this is an example of the Liberal in and out that we refer to as the double-double--

May 7th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, our next example is the Liberal double-double. On July 14, 2004 the Liberal Party made two transfers to Rick Limoges' local campaign for $5,000 and $4,000. The next day, Rick Limoges' local campaign made two transfers back to the Liberal party for $5,000 and $4,000.

May 7th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, again and again I shared with the members across the way examples of in and out that they have engaged in. They become very defensive, but what they do not realize is they, like us, did nothing wrong. Conservative candidates spent Conservative funds on Conservative ads.

May 7th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, in December 2001, the Bloc whip had this to say to Le Soleil: Advertising campaigns are national expenses, just like planes and buses made available to reporters. It is very expensive. The Bloc advances the money, but technically, the candidates are each responsible for their share.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, let us talk about Yvan Corriveau, the Liberal candidate in Mégantic—L'Érable. On January 24, 2006, there was a transfer from the Liberal Party to Mr. Corriveau's local campaign for $4,950. On January 24, the same day, there was a transfer from Mr. Corriveau's local campaign to the Liberal Party for $4,950.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, or we could talk about Aileen Carroll, the Liberal candidate in Barrie—Simcoe—Bradford. On July 26, 2004, there was a transfer from the Liberal Party to Aileen Carroll's local campaign for $5,000. On August 6, 10 days later, there was a transfer from Aileen Carroll's local campaign to the Liberal Party for $5,000.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, he is beginning to make our case to Elections Canada. The Liberals have now conceded that it is perfectly legal for national parties to transfer money to local campaigns, for local campaigns to purchase services from the national campaign, for national content to appear in local advertising and for local advertising in some cases to be broadcast outside of the constituency in which it is paid for, because of course radio signals do not stop at constituency borders.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, according to Elections Canada, on May 17, 2006, the Bloc transferred $17,800 to its candidate in Pontiac, the very riding the hon. member talked about. On May 25, a week later, the candidate transferred $17,700 back. So $17,000 went in, and $17,000 went back out. When did the father of the in and out method find out about that?

May 6th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, let us quote the return of the member for Don Valley West to Elections Canada. On July 9, 2004 there was a transfer from the Liberal Party to the member for Don Valley West's local campaign for $5,000. On July 15, 2004, one week later, there was a transfer from the member for Don Valley West's local campaign to the Liberal Party for $5,000.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, according to Elections Canada, on July 27, 2004, Marlene Catterall, the Liberal candidate in Ottawa West--Nepean, cashed a cheque from the Liberal Party of Canada for $3,300. On August 18, 2004, the Liberal Party of Canada cashed a cheque from Marlene Catterall's local campaign for--let us guess--$3,300.

May 5th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, according to Elections Canada, on July 26, 2004, the Liberal Party of Canada, national, sent a cheque cashed by the local campaign of Aileen Carroll. Then, on August 6, 2004, only 10 days later, the Liberal Party of Canada then cashed a cheque from Ms. Carroll for exactly the same number of dollars: $5,000 in, $5,000 out.

May 5th, 2008House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative