Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 5551-5565 of 5815
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Criminal Code  Mr. Speaker, I see we have struck a nerve here. I know that particular member has received a lot of pressure from his constituents, who are very angry that he broke his promise and that his party broke its promise to support mandatory jail time for hardened criminals. That is a big issue in his riding.

October 4th, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Criminal Code  Mr. Speaker, the member across complained vigorously about the Conservative government's decision to get tough on crime. He complained loudly that the Conservative government has introduced over a dozen tough on crime bills in the House of Commons. He complained that it is too much legislation for the House of Commons to deal with and that we should not be getting so tough on criminals.

October 4th, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Red Friday Rally  Mr. Speaker, in less than an hour, thousands of proud Canadians will show their support for our brave men and women who serve with honour in our military by attending a massive rally in front of Parliament Hill. Thousands more are wearing red from coast to coast to show solidarity for those who risk their lives serving Canada abroad every day.

September 22nd, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, these petitioners strongly support the government's decision to cut off both diplomatically and financially the Hamas government in the Palestinian territories. They believe that Canada should stand four square behind the Middle East's leading democracy in Israel and that Canada should not finance a terrorist-led regime.

June 22nd, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, there is no denying the essential role that the member for Ottawa Centre played in the development of this bill. He was regularly at committee and showed tremendous interest in whistleblower protection, a fact which is congruent with the thousands of public servants who live in his constituency.

June 21st, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has strengthened Parliament. Contrary to the words of my distinguished colleague, he has not appointed chairs to committees. Those chairs are elected by Standing Order. They have always been elected and we have continued in that practice. It is impossible for him to appoint a chair because none of the committees have a majority of Conservatives on them.

June 21st, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the hon. member for Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre. They all said it could not be done. All the experts, all the pundits--

June 21st, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank the chamber for its generosity. As I was saying, they all said that it could not be done. All the punditry, the experts and the folks around Parliament Hill said that it was too ambitious a task, that it was too big, too strong and too tough, that the Prime Minister's timeframe to have the accountability act passed through the House of Commons before summer was impossible.

June 21st, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Yes, Mr. Speaker, I would be delighted. I see our time is evaporating now, but in the brief time that we have left the NDP Motion No. 17 adds ACOA to the English version of clause 165. We believe the government's motion, Motion No. 18, accomplishes that objective, but does so in a fashion that is more eloquent and drafted more correctly.

June 20th, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, the member is not correct. It is not possible for the government to withdraw Motion No. 17 because it is an NDP motion. Theoretically, we can only withdraw our own amendments. However, we encourage members of the House to oppose Motions Nos. 17 and 19 and then support the government's Motion No. 18.

June 20th, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for making this promise. I also thank him for the work he does in committee as well as in the House.

June 20th, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, an improved Access to Information Act is precisely what this government has delivered. We have delivered amendments in the accountability act that extend access to information far beyond where they have ever gone before. This is the greatest expansion in the history of Canada of access to information.

June 20th, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I am proud to rise today to address very succinctly the motions that we have before us in the Group No. 2 package of amendments to the accountability act. I will list very quickly the government's position on those amendments. First is Motion No. 8 by the NDP. We are open to considering this amendment.

June 20th, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for his work on the committee. On the question of Motion No. 1, I will bring to the House's attention exactly what this amendment does. It deals with the provisions around parliamentary secretaries and ministers of the Crown voting on matters in which they have a direct commercial or financial interest.

June 20th, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I am thankful for the occasion to speak to these motions. I think most members of the House will agree that these amendments are largely technical in nature and fix the minor problems that the committee was not able to address. I would invite any comments and questions from members across the way but I do not see these as being particularly controversial.

June 20th, 2006House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative