Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 5851-5865 of 5956
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Budget Implementation Act, 2005  Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to rise in the House today. We look across the floor at a government that is corrupt and ruining our country's finances. We have seen this corruption exemplified by the Liberal ad scam, the $2 billion gun registry and the $1 billion boondoggle of HRDC.

May 18th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Members of the House of Commons Recall Act  moved for leave to introduce Bill C-383, an act to allow the recall of members of the House of Commons. Mr. Speaker, my private member's bill would restore the very principle of democratic accountability to our system of parliamentary democracy. It would permit constituents who are unhappy with the representation in their given riding to form a petition requiring 50% of them to terminate the employment of that member of Parliament from his or her elected office.

May 11th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  Mr. Speaker, the hon. member spoke about Liberal waste and Liberal corruption. We know this is a corrupt, wasteful government. I want to identify what I consider to be the number one article of waste in the Liberal government's agenda, and I would like to find out what the hon. member thinks of my thesis on this.

May 10th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  Mr. Speaker, the hon. member spoke very much of his Liberal priorities. One such priority is the establishment of a government day care bureaucracy which the Liberals have been pushing relentlessly. While we in this party will keep existing agreements that have been signed with the provinces, I want him to know that he will find no support on this side of the House for a government day care bureaucracy.

May 10th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Government Contracts  Mr. Speaker, section 14 of the Parliament of Canada Act says: No person who is a member of the Senate shall, directly or indirectly, knowingly and wilfully be a party to or be concerned in any contract under which the public money of Canada is to be paid. As CEO and a $30 million shareholder in a company that has a $100 million contract with the government, Liberal Senator Massicotte is breaking the law.

May 6th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to rise in the House today to present a petition by my constituents who believe that the Government of Canada should no longer make rental charges to a community hospital just outside the borders of my constituency, the Queensway Carleton Hospital. The petitioners believe the Government of Canada should not impose new burdens of rent on an institution that is meant to serve the health needs of nearly 400,000 people, many of whom are seniors.

May 4th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Citizen Engagement  Mr. Chair, the hon. member spoke eloquently about the issue of democratic reform. One of the questions that always occurs to me when we discuss the issue of democratic input into governance is how it affects our policies with respect to internationalists. When the tsunami crisis occurred, there was a massive outpouring of support for and assistance to the people who had been devastated by that natural disaster.

May 3rd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Government Contracts  Mr. Speaker, the fact remains that section 14 of the Parliament of Canada Act bans senators from participating in government business, whether they were appointed before or after that government business started. That means the Liberals broke the law and paid millions to a Liberal senator's company for an empty building.

May 3rd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Government Contracts  Mr. Speaker, Liberal Senator Massicotte would have us believe that he broke no rule in signing a $100 million contract with the federal government. But subsection 14(1) of the Parliament of Canada Act states, “ No person who is a member of the Senate shall...be a party to...any contract under which the public money of Canada is to be paid.”

May 3rd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Government Contracts  Mr. Speaker, a lease contract between Liberal Senator Paul Massicotte and the Liberal government once again turned into a taxpayers' nightmare. I am trying to understand the logic. The government paid Senator Massicotte's company $10 million over one year for a building that was serving no purpose, except perhaps that of squandering public funds.

May 2nd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Government Contracts  Mr. Speaker, where I come from people start paying rent when they move into the place. The government has been paying half a million dollars per month to the company of a Quebec Liberal senator for a building that was totally empty for an entire year, and half empty for the last six months.

May 2nd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Committees of the House  Mr. Speaker, I want to ask a substantive question about the direction of the government. The government promises to spend at least $5 billion on a day care bureaucracy. Experts in the field, advocates who support this plan, actually say it will cost ultimately $10 billion a year to bring in a fully institutionalized day care bureaucracy, the kind the government is ultimately promising.

April 22nd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Infrastructure  Mr. Speaker, three days before the last election campaign, Ottawa Liberals held a fancy press conference in Barrhaven, where they promised $200 million in infrastructure. One year later, they have broken their promise. The money still sits in the federal vault. The federal Liberals have not even signed a contract, just a press release.

April 22nd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Property Rights  Mr. Speaker, I want to address the entirely and deliberately specious aspect of the Liberal argument on this issue. The Liberals argue that this motion, which protects private property in a way that is done in most civilized nations of the earth, would somehow inhibit the government's ability to recover stolen property.

April 21st, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Property Rights  That is beautiful.

April 21st, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative