Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 5866-5880 of 5956
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Property Rights  Mr. Speaker, Nepean--Carleton is the riding I represent and it is the region I want to speak about today. At the outset of the creation of the Federal District Commission, which has now become the National Capital Commission, farmers had huge pieces of land confiscated. They were paid only a third of the market value of that time.

April 21st, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Charitable Organizations  Mr. Speaker, tonight our Prime Minister will perform a nationally televised panic attack. He is now desperate. He has tried for months to get people to forget about the Liberal ad scam. Now the Liberal scheme is to claim that everyone is corrupt. Citizens should learn that all politicians steal and all charities take money that does not belong to them, so goes the Liberal line.

April 21st, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Gasoline Prices  Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Due to a lot of noise at the back of the chamber, I accidentally voted in favour of the motion. If the distinguished Chair would allow it, I would like to be recorded as proudly opposed to this motion.

April 20th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Civil Marriage Act  Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to rise today in support of the traditional definition of marriage. I am also rising in support of the values and the interests that my constituents have communicated to me. On this critical subject that will define our times, my constituents have told me overwhelmingly that they would like to see their member of Parliament take a balanced position on the question of marriage.

April 19th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, the hon. member is correct. The Liberals are reverting to the same argument that Jean Chrétien made to defend the massive theft of Canadian tax dollars. Jean Chrétien stood and said, “Yes, a few million went missing, but we saved the country”. Now the Liberals are saying that anyone who criticizes their party for having stolen our money is undermining national unity.

April 14th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, my work is done. This party clearly stated that there had been an audit. Those were the words that were used. Now we find out that there was no audit, only a review. That gentleman, who purports to be an accountant, is attempting to tell us that a review is the same as an audit, if not even more rigorous.

April 14th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to speak today and to support the motion introduced by the member for Laurier—Sainte-Marie, which says: That the House call on the government to immediately establish a trust account into which the Liberal Party of Canada can deposit all funds received from companies and individuals tied to the sponsorship scandal and identified in testimony before the Gomery commission.

April 14th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, I notice that this is a very touchy subject for the Liberal member. He is not happy to hear the truth about his party. I will repeat so that all Canadians who follow our debate get a good idea of the real extent of the scandal. The Liberals stole the taxpayers' money to finance their activities.

April 14th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, I rise today to present a petition by Canadians across the country who come together and ask that the House take all steps to preserve and protect the current definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.

April 5th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, during the debate on equalization and the fiscal imbalance, the Bloc members and the Liberals lost sight of what is most important. The Bloc members say there is not enough money in the pockets of the Government of Quebec. The Liberals say there is not enough money in the pockets of the federal government.

March 22nd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, the hon. member spoke about the importance of fairness. I would like to build on that theme. We have a government that drives a financial wedge between parents and their children by imposing financial penalties on those families that have a stay at home parent. This issue was addressed this past weekend at the Conservative convention.

March 22nd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Supply  Violating the Constitution.

March 22nd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Sponsorship Program  Mr. Speaker, since he became the Prime Minister, the leader of the Liberal Party has consistently denied having known anything about the sponsorship racket. But his friend and long-time organizer was caught red-handed. It is now well known that Jacques Roy illegally received thousands of dollars for his work during election campaigns.

March 22nd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Sponsorship Program  Mr. Speaker, even the transport minister said that those dollars should be paid back to taxpayers before the sponsorship commission is finished its study. Why is it that the government is now contradicting the original position of the transport minister? Finally, the Prime Minister says he knew nothing, but now two of his senior Quebec organizers are directly implicated.

March 22nd, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

The Budget  So why do you want to take that away?

March 9th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative