Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 616-630 of 861
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Infrastructure  Mr. Speaker, the government can try, but it is not going to change the channel. What FCM members heard this weekend was groundbreaking. For the first time, a study has demonstrated conclusively that more jobs are killed by property tax increases than by sales tax or income tax.

June 2nd, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Points of Order  Mr. Speaker, yesterday, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency and to the Minister of International Trade raised a point of order regarding unparliamentary language in the House the day before. I want to say that the discussion that is in question here was not even a matter on the floor between two members.

May 28th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, I present more petitions in opposition to Bill C-10. As has been mentioned, these petitioners also call upon Parliament to staunchly defend Canadian artistic and cultural expression, to rescind any provisions of Bill C-10, which allow the government to censor film and video production in Canada, and to ensure that the government has in place objective and transparent guidelines that respect freedom of expression when delivering any program intended to support film and video production in Canada.

May 26th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, once again, I am reverting to that other place where it was allowed. I did not know that was not allowed here. I apologize and I will not do it again.

May 26th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Poverty  Mr. Speaker, a recent Statistics Canada report shows that the spectre of poverty continues to haunt Hamilton families. From 2001 to 2006, while the Liberal Party held government, we saw almost no change in the number of children living in poverty. In 2001, 24% of our kids lived below the poverty line; in 2006, that had only dropped to 23.6%.

May 26th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Post Corporation  Mr. Speaker, the government has finally announced a review of Canada Post's mandate. In the minister's words, the review will “make sure this public institution has the right tools and means to fulfill its mandate in the future”, but at the same time, the minister is continuing to ram through Bill C-14, legislation that will take those very tools and means away.

May 15th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Post Corporation  Mr. Speaker, the reality is Bill C-14 is going to result in either higher postage rates or decreased rural mail delivery and neither is acceptable to Canadians. The minister is also slashing rural mail services as we stand here today without even consulting communities or CUPW.

May 15th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present to the House a petition with regard to the tragic land claim situation in Caledonia. Over 1,000 Hamilton area residents have signed this petition, which calls on Parliament to halt development of those lands currently under dispute until the claims are justly settled.

May 14th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Post Corporation Act  Mr. Speaker, as much as the Liberals do not want anyone to think this has anything to do with rural mail delivery, privatization or deregulation, the fact is that it speaks to the very heart of the ability of Canada Post to remain the entity that it is, to provide the service it provides and to do it in a manner that does not cost the taxpayer, through any extra subsidies, any extra money.

May 6th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Officers of Parliament  Mr. Speaker, while meeting with the public accounts committee yesterday, Auditor General Sheila Fraser told us that she and other independent officers of Parliament were ordered to have their communications material and media releases vetted by the government. This is an unprecedented attempt to violate the autonomy of these independent officers.

April 30th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Officers of Parliament  Mr. Speaker, the Auditor General, the Ethics Commissioner, the Chief Electoral Officer, the Privacy and Information Commissioner and others are independent officers. This should be an easy concept to grasp. Demanding that they vet their work through PCO is an attack on their independence.

April 30th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I will be pleased to stand. If the member wants to talk about jobs, take a look at the track record of the finance minister while he was the finance minister in Ontario. From January 2001 to April 2002, we lost 90,000 jobs, youth unemployment was up by 31,000, agricultural unemployment was up by 25,000 and manufacturing unemployment was up by 29,000.

March 31st, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I hoped that question would come up since it would not cut into my 10 minute speech. I can only figure one of two things. Either the government knows there is a serious economic downturn coming that will really hurt Ontario and it wants as much as possible to deflect the criticism from the Conservatives to the provincial government and/or it is the opening salvo in the hon. finance minister's run to succeed the current leader of the Ontario Conservatives.

March 31st, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for Parkdale—High Park. I am pleased to join in the debate, and I thank the official opposition for putting the motion forward. It is a shame that the most the Liberals can do is be a paper tiger, which is what they have done today.

March 31st, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

The Budget  Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I seek your assistance, Mr. Speaker, as to whether or not it is in order for us to be debating a budget when there are no members of the official opposition present in the House. Is that still within the rules, or do we have to have at least one member of the official opposition to have a proper budget debate?

February 28th, 2008House debate

David ChristophersonNDP