Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 661-675 of 839
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Child Care  The leader of the New Democratic Party expresses reservations about whether we will achieve our objective of creating 125,000 child care spaces. Let me just be clear that this is the intention of this government and we will make whatever modifications are necessary to ensure that we reach that goal.

May 1st, 2006House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

National Defence  Mr. Speaker, the Minister of National Defence has made it very clear that what is driving this policy is what is in the wishes and the best interests of the families. I would suggest to the Leader of the Opposition that politicizing these funerals is entirely unbecoming his office.

April 25th, 2006House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Canada-U.S. Border  Mr. Speaker, we have always been clear. The law in question is a law of Congress. It is not a law of this government nor of this Parliament. Unlike the previous government, we have taken action right away to ensure that we are ready to respond if and when this law does come into effect.

April 24th, 2006House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

National Defence  Speaker, as I have said in the House before, the Minister of National Defence, who was a member of the armed forces himself and is very knowledgeable on the defence industry, has complied and will comply with all conflict of interest regulations. However, let me be clear. The spending plans of the government for national defence are there to ensure that our men and women in uniform have the best equipment possible.

April 10th, 2006House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Child Care  The Minister of Human Resources has indicated that we are flexible on how the program is put together in a way that will create spaces. Let me be clear that when we bring in our program next year it will have space creation targets, something that was missing in the previous government's program.

April 10th, 2006House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Agriculture  During the recent election we promised to commit at least an additional $500 million every year to farm support programs, a promise we will carry through on. Let me be clear, this will be new money on top of existing agricultural programs, not reallocation. In addition, this government will stand up for farmers in supply managed sectors. We will ensure that agricultural industries that choose to work within a national supply managed system remain viable.

April 6th, 2006House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Public Works and Government Services  Speaker, the hon. member spoke of the views of Montrealers and Quebeckers. I can tell you that the views of Quebeckers are clear. They are not in favour of a centralist government or an independent Quebec; they are in favour of a stronger Quebec within a better Canada. Those are Conservative principles.

April 5th, 2006House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Softwood Lumber  Now is not the time for inaction, for dithering or delay, nor is it a time to play a game of winks and nudges, and looking for signs. Now is the time to be clear and to stand up firmly for this country. Now is the time, quite frankly, as soon as we can, in my view, to ask the people of Canada to put in office a government that will take a different approach to our relationship with the United States.

October 25th, 2005House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Civil Marriage Act  The institution of marriage is of great importance to large numbers of Canadians, and the definition of marriage as found in the hon. member's motion is clear in law. As stated in the motion, the definition of marriage is already clear in law. It is not found in a statute, but then not all law exists in statutes, and the law is no less binding and no less the law because it is found in the common law instead of in a statute.

February 16th, 2005House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Committees of the House  Yesterday, a majority of members indicated they no longer had confidence in this government. What we are saying again today to the Liberals and the government could not be more clear. We are proud of our country, but we are ashamed of our government. Get out of here! We are holding a debate today when everyone in this country knows that the government no longer enjoys the confidence of the House.

May 11th, 2005House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Supply  This report removed the benefit of any doubt about the depth of corruption within the Liberal Party of Canada. In his report, Justice Gomery noted: clear evidence of political involvement in the administration of the Sponsorship Program;— a complex web of financial transactions—involving kickbacks and illegal contributions to a political party—; the existence of a “culture of entitlement” among political officials and bureaucrats— These statements can no longer be dismissed as media speculation or as partisan attacks.

November 24th, 2005House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Sponsorship Program  The Prime Minister tried to say earlier in question period that those Liberals who engaged in this conduct will be held individually responsible. However Justice Gomery was clear when he said that the Liberal Party, as an institution, should be held responsible as well for those actions. Will the Prime Minister do the right thing, hold the Liberal Party responsible and sue it for the $45 million that still cannot be accounted for?

November 2nd, 2005House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Sponsorship Program  The Prime Minister wrongly stated that the decision to provide him with a copy before the other leaders was made by Justice Gomery. Today the latter has said that it is clear that the Prime Minister has a choice. Will the Prime Minister do what must be done and put an end to all the secrecy? Will he immediately hand over a copy of the report to each opposition party leader?

October 31st, 2005House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Aboriginal Affairs  Speaker, maybe the Prime Minister should go to actual crime statistics rather than the mayor of Toronto. In any case, on another matter, it is clear that the problem in Kashechewan starts with the incompetence of the Minister of Indian Affairs. This minister goes to the reserve, refuses to drink the water or sleep there and returns to Ottawa, knows all about the problems, and does nothing about them for weeks on end.

October 27th, 2005House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Child Care  Mr. Speaker, it is very difficult to take that seriously. On a different topic, it is clear that the federal government intends to impose its conditions on Quebec with respect to the child care program. Yesterday, Quebec's Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs stated that “The use of the federal spending power is a threat.

October 19th, 2005House debate

Stephen HarperConservative