Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 7021-7035 of 7213
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Civil Marriage Act  If he is willing to coerce them with pressure and threats of demotion and force them to vote against their conscience and their constituents, if he is willing to do all of that, if he is willing to attack the independent conscience of his own members of Parliament, how can he as Prime Minister be expected to defend the freedom of conscience of the Canadian people?

April 19th, 2005House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Sponsorship Program  Speaker, I will give the Prime Minister another chance to answer this question. The Prime Minister tried to say that the opposition majority on the committee voted against hearing Jean Brault. There was no opposition majority. The Liberals controlled the majority at that point. The question is, and let us not hide behind other people, why did the Prime Minister order the Liberal members to vote against hearing Jean Brault's testimony in public?

April 11th, 2005House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Standing Orders and Procedure  On making crown corporations subject to the Access to Information Act, the Prime Minister voted against Bill C-216, an act to amend the Access to Information Act for crown corporations. Therefore, Bill C-216 must be necessary and should be implemented. I think the House gets the idea.

April 11th, 2005House debate

Jay HillConservative

Committees of the House  Thousands of Canadians have suffered and continue to suffer needlessly because of the Liberals trying to close the window and narrow the number of people who could benefit from some kind of compensation. It is interesting to note there are some here in the House on the government side who voted against this the last time we had an opportunity in 1998 to address this wrong. The Prime Minister voted against it. At that time he said that we should forget the other victims and that we should keep it to this narrow group.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Stockwell DayConservative

Committees of the House  In 1998 when the Liberal government voted against extending compensation to victims outside this artificial window, the nation was told that doing so would bankrupt the system. Canadians were told that there were 22,000 victims in this artificial window and an additional 60,000 outside that window.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Gary GoodyearConservative

Committees of the House  This time, there is no hiding from the fact that this is going to come to a vote. I believe that is why the Liberals voted against it. They know that they are going to be caught red-handed in their own hypocrisy. They will have no way to get out of it. It will expose to Canadians once again the fact that the Liberals are uncaring, that they are not compassionate and that they are using these victims as a political tool.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Steven FletcherConservative

Committees of the House  The response from the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health was that this motion was passed unanimously by the committee. In fact, this is not the case. The Liberal members on the health committee voted against the report which is being presented today. I am very disappointed that the member would imply that the Liberals supported it when they did not. However, I welcome the Liberals' support when the report comes up for a vote.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Steven FletcherConservative

Civil Marriage Act  We even have no religious freedom from the government side in this debate, with cabinet ministers and parliamentary secretaries being told to vote against their conscience and against their religious beliefs or lose their positions. Marriage commissioners in B.C. and Saskatchewan were given notice to agree to marry same sex partners or lose their credentials.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Ken EppConservative

Civil Marriage Act  I could not agree more, which is why I have always been a strong supporter of the traditional definition of marriage. I will continue to vote against any legislation to change it, including Bill C-38 as it now stands.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Dale JohnstonConservative

Civil Marriage Act  To ascertain their opinions I have used my household mailings for a survey, have tallied telephone calls from all constituents, correspondence and also the many conversations I have heard around the riding. Overwhelmingly, over 90% have demanded that I vote against redefining marriage. I made a promise to represent them in the House and I will. I will be voting against Bill C-38. On a final note specifically to my gay, lesbian, transgendered and two-spirited community, I would like to assure them that I will continue to ensure that their registered relationships enjoy the same legal rights, responsibilities and obligations as other registered relationships.

March 21st, 2005House debate

Carol SkeltonConservative

Civil Marriage Act  Marriage is a religious institution. That is what I am standing here to protect. I will be voting against Bill C-38.

March 21st, 2005House debate

Mark WarawaConservative

The Budget  When the minister was in the House but not on that side of the House collecting an extra $48,000 a year as a cabinet minister, he voted against the Kyoto protocol because he said “it was cost jobs in every region of Canada”. Now that we know there is no plan for the Kyoto protocol, is he still opposed to the Kyoto protocol?

March 8th, 2005House debate

James MooreConservative

Agriculture  The cash advances are like finding a needle in a haystack and do not even kick in until next year, if at all. Two weeks ago the Liberal Party and even the minister voted against removing the CAIS deposit requirement. Yesterday he declared that he would not apologize for it. The March 31 deadline is fast approaching. The government admits that the program is a disaster and says that it will fix it, but, surprise, surprise, the government votes against any improvement.

February 25th, 2005House debate

Larry MillerConservative

Supply  We heard the parliamentary secretary make comments about the negative aspects of this motion, but I find it very amazing that yesterday that same parliamentary secretary voted against a health committee motion to give the Auditor General the ability to audit Infoway, among other foundations related to health. Unless he is against transparency, accountability and performance measures, why would the parliamentary secretary vote against the health committee motion, which passed with the support of all three opposition parties?

February 22nd, 2005House debate

Steven FletcherConservative

Child Care  Mr. Speaker, yesterday the Liberals voted against allowing parents to choose different child care options and voted against--

February 16th, 2005House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative