Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 7156-7170 of 7216
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Civil Marriage Act  It would be possible to legally define marriage to include homosexual couples, but this would not change the biological and social realities that underlie the traditional marriage. On that note, I urge all members in the House to vote against this bill.

April 5th, 2005House debate

Art HangerConservative

Civil Marriage Act  Let me be clear that I stand alongside the leader of the official opposition, the leader of the Conservative Party, in stating that I support the traditional definition of marriage as that of a union between a man and a woman and that I will vote against the Liberal government when this matter comes before the House. However let me also state clearly that I strongly support the Conservative Party's position on this question because, along with our support for traditional marriage, the Conservative Party supports civil unions for same sex couples.

April 5th, 2005House debate

Dave BattersConservative

Civil Marriage Act  Bill C-38 is an attack on our freedoms and it should be defeated. I urge colleagues to vote against it.

April 5th, 2005House debate

Monte SolbergConservative

Committees of the House  I understand that he and the member opposite, who happens to be related to the premier of Ontario, were the only ones on the committee who voted against that. I would like the member's comments about whether he felt that the first motion dealt adequately with this subject. Why would the parliamentary secretary say that it was disposed of when the Prime Minister completely ignored the recommendations of the committee and basically made a patronage appointment for a failed Liberal candidate?

April 5th, 2005House debate

David AndersonConservative

Committees of the House  It was a blatant example of political indifference toward those often too sick to fight for themselves. When members of the House voted against extending the compensation to all victims, some members of the Liberal Party shed tears in an attempt to show some sort of sympathy for the thousands of innocent victims. Instead, all they did was show how cold-hearted and spineless they were when it came to standing up for their constituents and their convictions.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Carol SkeltonConservative

Committees of the House  The issue is that every government has a responsibility, admitted by the Prime Minister and the Liberal Party, and the government is not living up to that responsibility or promise. The government voted for the motion. The Liberal Party voted against extending the compensation to all victims. That is shameful. The government should have voted for it. All the opposition parties voted for the motion. The money is there. The numbers are cut in half, regardless of what excuses the Liberal Party wants to come up with for its failure to research this problem adequately or for its mistakes to come up with accurate figures.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Gary GoodyearConservative

Health  Mr. Speaker, the Liberal members on the committee voted against this motion. The minister fails to realize that while he offers weak excuses victims continue to die. Legal justification may help him sleep at night, but to those who are already affected by this tragedy such excuses are a slap in the face.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Steven FletcherConservative

Civil Marriage Act  Unlike the Prime Minister and other members of his party, I have been consistent on this issue from day one. I oppose changing the definition of marriage and will vote against Bill C-38. In 1999 I spoke in favour of reaffirming the traditional definition of marriage. In fact I led off the debate on the Reform Party motion which passed on a vote of 216 to 55.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Gurmant GrewalConservative

Civil Marriage Act  When two become as one they yield their rights to each other. I for one will choose to stand for what is right for all Canadians. I will vote against the bill. I will vote with and for the people of Saskatoon—Humboldt. Here I stand; I can do no other.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Bradley TrostConservative

Civil Marriage Act  Speaker, with regard to the issue at stake, there are several reasons why I, as the member of Parliament for Haldimand—Norfolk, will be voting against extending marriage to same sex couples. First, I believe that the traditional definition of marriage is important to maintain the very clear distinction between opposite sex conjugal relationships and same sex ones.

April 4th, 2005House debate

Diane FinleyConservative

Civil Marriage Act  If members want the definition to stay as it is, while still respecting the rights and choices of others, then vote against the legislation. The point of respect is very important here. I dedicate my remarks today to my mother and to my recently deceased father who brought me up understanding and respecting a few things.

March 24th, 2005House debate

Stockwell DayConservative

Civil Marriage Act  I call on the right hon. gentleman to remove the whip, unmuzzle his cabinet members and allow them the dignity of voting as they believe. Personally, I will vote against Bill C-38, the so-called same sex marriage bill. The Prime Minister has had an eleventh hour conversion to the cause of same sex marriage. Many Canadians will remember that in 1999 the government supported a Reform Party motion that stated marriage would remain the lawful union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.

March 24th, 2005House debate

Nina GrewalConservative

Civil Marriage Act  I just heard a member of the NDP say that the majority of his constituents were not with him but that it did not matter because he was going to vote against them anyway. Hopefully they will show that kind of enthusiasm for him at the next election by carrying that out to its logical conclusion. One of the things that really concerned me were the comments that were made by the foreign affairs minister in late December when he basically told the churches and the people of faith that they should completely butt out of this debate.

March 24th, 2005House debate

David AndersonConservative

Civil Marriage Act  I have heard the argument and it has been repeated to me that in the case of same sex marriage, members of Parliament should ignore the majority of their constituents, that they should vote against an institution that has been a pillar of society for thousands of years in order to placate less than 1% of the population. That is the figure provided by StatsCanada as not being heterosexual.

March 24th, 2005House debate

Cheryl GallantConservative

Civil Marriage Act  Instead of listening to communities across this country, the Liberal government is declaring that Canadians cannot be trusted to do what is right. When I vote against this unnecessary and unwanted legislation, I will be voting in support of two core beliefs that society is built upon. The first principle is that marriage is the unique relationship between a man and a woman.

March 24th, 2005House debate

Dean AllisonConservative