Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 7171-7185 of 7216
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Civil Marriage Act  All my fellow members of Parliament and I have a duty to reflect the values and concerns of our constituents. I will be voting against this legislation that would change the definition of marriage, confident that I am faithfully taking the direction that has been so clearly expressed by the people of Niagara West—Glanbrook.

March 24th, 2005House debate

Dean AllisonConservative

Parliament of Canada Act  However, if the Bloc Québécois is insistent and in fact opposed to this amendment that we are discussing today, then I feel that it would naturally follow that its deputy House leader, deputy whip and caucus chairperson will obviously refuse this extra stipend that was revealed in the amendment that is under debate. I would assume that since they are voting against it. We also have a situation where chairmen of standing committees now receive compensation, but the caucus chairmen do not receive any extra compensation and we should be consistent.

March 23rd, 2005House debate

Jay HillConservative

Civil Marriage Act  In conclusion, the overwhelming ballot evidence from people in my community so far is that they are directing me to vote against the bill. They should receive no less.

March 21st, 2005House debate

Paul ForsethConservative

Canadian Livestock Industry  Speaker, I do not think there was a question in the member's comments, but he refers to a reality. Try to tell that to the producers in my riding and across the country. The Liberals voted against the motion to get rid of it. It is as simple as that. Therefore, I go back to the CAIS program. Will the minister go back to his staff and instruct the changes, and in what form and in what timing?

March 8th, 2005House debate

Larry MillerConservative

Canadian Livestock Industry  Producers who cannot put food on their tables borrowed that money. They put it up front and they need it back, and they need it back now. The Liberals voted against our motion to drop the CAIS cash deposit and now they say they want it gone. As the member for Selkirk--Interlake pointed out, they have agreed to put it in the budget, and I do thank the minister for that, but it is still a long way from being gone.

March 8th, 2005House debate

Larry MillerConservative

Canadian Livestock Industry  We know for a fact that when we talked about the CAIS program in debate as a supply day motion the government voted against us. However I was encouraged that the minister was able to convince the Minister of Finance to include the removal of the CAIS deposit program in the budget. Unfortunately, some debate is still going on at the federal-provincial meetings on whether those deposits should be removed and what would replace them.

March 8th, 2005House debate

James BezanConservative

Canadian Livestock Industry  I know the particular crisis that occurred a few days ago in barring live cattle, which could have started flowing March 7, was as a direct result of a court injunction. However, what we also know is the senate in the United States voted against opening the border. It is not simply enough to say that this was in the hands of the courts and it was an independent organization. What the senate vote reflects is a failure by this government to actively and consistently lobby the U.S. senate and Congress to ensure the votes were there and that they understood Canadian beef was safe.

March 8th, 2005House debate

Vic ToewsConservative

Reproductive Technologies  Speaker, just a few hours ago the United Nations General Assembly passed a declaration to ban all forms of human cloning. The margin was 84 to 34, but Canada voted against the ban. In October the health minister said to the House, “We are committed to opposing all forms of human cloning, and we will take the positions internationally that are consistent with our domestic policies”.

March 8th, 2005House debate

Rob MerrifieldConservative

The Budget  I will point out that the opposition parties, the Conservatives, the Bloc, and the NDP, all voted in favour of this motion. The Liberals voted against it, which suggests that the Liberals are afraid of transparency, afraid of accountability and afraid that they may get caught with their hands in the cookie jar again. With regard to the specific wording of my presentation, the overall intent is to show that billions of dollars have been set aside without the accountability or the transparency that Canadians expect when they pay their taxes.

March 8th, 2005House debate

Steven FletcherConservative

The Budget  As far as the vote goes, obviously I am opposed to this budget. I do not think it does what it should do. When one is opposed to something one votes against it.

March 7th, 2005House debate

Bob MillsConservative

The Budget  The parliamentary secretary, along with other ministers, including the finance minister and the Prime Minister, voted against our motion that the deposit be dropped. Now they say they are talking about it. Talk is too little. The farmers require action. Would the parliamentary secretary undertake categorically to say that the CAIS deposit requirement will be dropped and that the government will see to it, regardless of what the provinces may or may not do.

March 7th, 2005House debate

Ed KomarnickiConservative

Agriculture  These losses are the direct result of trade injury from U.S. subsidies, something over which our producers have no control, yet the 2005 Liberal budget wilfully ignores their plight. Last week Liberals voted against the Conservative motion to drop the CAIS cash deposit. Now they want to drop it--eventually. For the sake of farmers, I say get rid of it now and honour CAIS payment commitments to producers not later but now.

February 25th, 2005House debate

Jeff WatsonConservative

Health  The government took a position at the United Nations that was contrary to its own legislation that bans all cloning. If the government is against human cloning, why did it vote against the ban last week?

February 24th, 2005House debate

Rob MerrifieldConservative

Health  Speaker, last week a declaration to ban all forms of human cloning was passed at the United Nations. How did Canada vote? It voted against the motion. Two years ago the former health minister assured the House that Canada would support a comprehensive ban. Even in October the new health minister said, “We are committed to opposing all forms of human cloning”.

February 24th, 2005House debate

Rob MerrifieldConservative

Supply  Yesterday the Standing Committee on Health passed a motion requesting that the federal government appoint the Auditor General to provide external performance audits on health related government foundations. This motion passed with the support of all opposition parties. The Liberals however voted against the motion which indicates that they are against transparency and honesty when dealing with taxpayers' money. It should be noted that the Auditor General stated at the meeting yesterday that her office often audits departments and agencies on the recommendations of committees.

February 22nd, 2005House debate

Steven FletcherConservative