Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 61-75 of 2675
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Marijuana  Mr. Speaker, on the subject of all talk no action, the Prime Minister promised to immediately legalize marijuana, but at the same time, he is blocking our attempts to ensure that people no longer get criminal records for simple possession. That just seems like common sense to us,

June 7th, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Marijuana  Mr. Speaker, the law is the law, unless someone is the son of a prime minister, of course. The Prime Minister admitted to smoking marijuana after he became a member of Parliament, and now he is telling all other Canadians that they have put their pot down. Fifteen thousand Canad

June 7th, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Foreign Affairs  Mr. Speaker, Setsuko Thurlow is in Parliament today. She has been a Canadian citizen for 60 years, but when she was a 13-year-old girl, on August 6, 1945, in Hiroshima, an atomic bomb wiped most of her city and most of her family. She has made it her life's work to fight against

June 7th, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Appointments  Mr. Speaker, Canadians would trust him more if he would answer a simple question like which one of them was lying. I would like to quote exactly what the minister said: “Ms. Telford and Mr. Butts never discussed with Ms. Meilleur the possibility that she could become the Commiss

June 6th, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Intergovernmental Relations  Mr. Speaker, I would say “highly Liberal”. The Prime Minister of Canada has the duty to seriously and calmly consider the recommendations of all the provinces. However, rather than considering Quebec's request to open a discussion, the Prime Minister acted impulsively and irresp

June 6th, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Intergovernmental Relations  What arrogance, Mr. Speaker. If Newfoundland and Labrador or Nova Scotia wanted to discuss the fishery or if British Columbia wanted to discuss issues facing indigenous people in Canada, would the government have slammed the door like that? No. Its contempt is reserved for Quebe

June 6th, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Appointments  Mr. Speaker, when it comes to government nominations, the Prime Minister now pretends that he is partisan blind. He does not know what that means, so let me describe what partisanship looks like. It is when we donate to a politician's campaign and then get appointed by that polit

June 6th, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Appointments  Mr. Speaker, it is duly noted that the minister has just said that Madeleine Meilleur intentionally misled this Parliament. That makes her ineligible to named to a high office like commissioner of official languages. The minister led the process to appoint Ms. Meilleur and is c

June 1st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Appointments  Mr. Speaker, Gerry Butts and Katie Telford were also not officially part of the process, but they were indeed involved. Will the minister answer the question or not? Did the minister contact those employees in some way during Ms. Meilleur's appointment process? Answer the questi

June 1st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Appointments  Mr. Speaker, we also found out today that when Madame Meilleur was interested in becoming an Ontario Liberal candidate, she bypassed the standard candidate nomination process. Who pulled the strings so she could be parachuted into a riding? It was none other than Gerry Butts. No

June 1st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Government Appointments  Mr. Speaker, the minister of heritage made a significant claim in the House yesterday. She stated that Gerry Butts and Katie Telford did not discuss the position of commissioner with Madeleine Meilleur. This contradicts Meilleur's own testimony at committee. My question for the

June 1st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, that question really is the essence of what we are discussing here today. The Prime Minister said the process was broken. The ministerial review panel on Kinder Morgan said the process was broken. The expert panel on the NEB said the process was broken. Why do th

June 1st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, in the filings of Kinder Morgan with the National Energy Board, it did not talk about 15,000 jobs. It talked about 50, not 50,000 but 50 jobs permanently created by that pipeline. I do not know where the 15,000 comes from. I would ask my colleague one thing. Why d

June 1st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, we know that the members of the National Energy Board, who were holding hearings on the energy east project, actually sat down with Jean Charest and admitted, because they had to be replaced because they were in an obvious conflict, that they were there to find out

June 1st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, the member is also from British Columbia and has looked at this for a long time, but let us not forget that it is not Rachel Notley who promised a new system to evaluate the Kinder Morgan project; it is the Prime Minister. He is the one who is breaking his promise,

June 1st, 2017House debate

Thomas MulcairNDP