Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Electoral Reform committee I might gently disagree with Professor Pilon and say that I think the public do need to be involved in a substantial way. Your question, I think, is what that looks like, and it is not focused on systems and is not focused, as Professor Pilon mentioned, on the engine, but on the
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee I think you've put your finger on the fundamental tension, the relationship between the assembly and the work they do afterwards. We can, I think, learn a lot from what was done 15 years ago. We can use technology and media to ensure that there is a conversation happening at the
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee I don't think you need an either/or, but I do think a citizens' assembly or some kind of deep deliberative exercise would be useful. I'm happy to sketch out, if we have time later, how that might look, but you are absolutely the elected representative, and in some sense the buck
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee Okay, thanks.
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee Exactly.
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee I think that's exactly the process.
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee But I think there is an opportunity for a citizens' assembly to provide a broad-based, evidence-based opinion about what values are important and how that informs your work.
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee I think so.
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee Absolutely.
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee No. I think a citizens' assembly is similar to a jury. What does a jury do? A jury looks at evidence, deliberates, comes to a decision, and then makes a recommendation to a judge. A judge doesn't second-guess a jury. A judge doesn't second-guess a jury, because the task has been
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee When we talk about trade-offs in Parliament, we're talking about what kind of parliament we want. Electoral systems produce a Parliament, and a Parliament looks a certain way based on the electoral system. Imagine the electoral system as an engine. Depending on how you tune tha
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee I think it's really about how we think of our party system. Our party system is a brokerage party system, which is a big tent. Arguably, we are one of the few countries that has had such a broad group of people under one political party. If you think of it that way, political par
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee Thanks for the question. I think the quote you're referring to is actually part of a quote in which I said that some would argue that a referendum would be a good thing. I think there are great reasons to have a referendum, the primary one being legitimacy, but I still maintain
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Prof. Jonathan Rose
Electoral Reform committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you very much for inviting me to this committee. Like many Canadians, I've been following your crash course on electoral systems with great interest. As a political scientist who finds the topic as fascinating as it is complex, I've been really impre
July 28th, 2016Committee meeting
Professor Jonathan Rose