Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 61-74 of 74
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Electoral Reform committee  I might gently disagree with Professor Pilon and say that I think the public do need to be involved in a substantial way. Your question, I think, is what that looks like, and it is not focused on systems and is not focused, as Professor Pilon mentioned, on the engine, but on the

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  I think you've put your finger on the fundamental tension, the relationship between the assembly and the work they do afterwards. We can, I think, learn a lot from what was done 15 years ago. We can use technology and media to ensure that there is a conversation happening at the

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  I don't think you need an either/or, but I do think a citizens' assembly or some kind of deep deliberative exercise would be useful. I'm happy to sketch out, if we have time later, how that might look, but you are absolutely the elected representative, and in some sense the buck

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  Okay, thanks.

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  I think that's exactly the process.

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  But I think there is an opportunity for a citizens' assembly to provide a broad-based, evidence-based opinion about what values are important and how that informs your work.

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  No. I think a citizens' assembly is similar to a jury. What does a jury do? A jury looks at evidence, deliberates, comes to a decision, and then makes a recommendation to a judge. A judge doesn't second-guess a jury. A judge doesn't second-guess a jury, because the task has been

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  When we talk about trade-offs in Parliament, we're talking about what kind of parliament we want. Electoral systems produce a Parliament, and a Parliament looks a certain way based on the electoral system. Imagine the electoral system as an engine. Depending on how you tune tha

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  I think it's really about how we think of our party system. Our party system is a brokerage party system, which is a big tent. Arguably, we are one of the few countries that has had such a broad group of people under one political party. If you think of it that way, political par

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  Thanks for the question. I think the quote you're referring to is actually part of a quote in which I said that some would argue that a referendum would be a good thing. I think there are great reasons to have a referendum, the primary one being legitimacy, but I still maintain

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jonathan Rose

Electoral Reform committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you very much for inviting me to this committee. Like many Canadians, I've been following your crash course on electoral systems with great interest. As a political scientist who finds the topic as fascinating as it is complex, I've been really impre

July 28th, 2016Committee meeting

Professor Jonathan Rose