Industry committee  They are exigent circumstances, a reasonable law other than section 44, and common-law authority that police have. Those are the three circumstances that are set out in Spencer. Again, they are not cumulative. They are separate; it's either-or. Either there are exigent circumstances or there's a reasonable law or there is common-law authority whereby personal information that does not attract a reasonable expectation of privacy can be disclosed.

Industry committee  The statute says: Information anonymized under this Act must be anonymized according to generally accepted best practices and according to the criteria and terms determined by regulation. It is section 23 under the title “Destruction or anonymization”. When you get rid of personal information, you're either destroying it or turning it into anonymous information, so you can't reidentify.

Industry committee  That's one thing that generally accepted best practices do. They require organizations to ensure their information is anonymized in accordance with generally accepted best practices. Those practices evolve. For example, ISO has a standard on anonymization, and that standard may evolve.

Industry committee  It's on page 30, in proposed paragraph 62(2)(e).

Industry committee  It's a reference to sensitive information.

Industry committee  It includes minors.

Industry committee  It's the sensitive information of all adults and all information about minors. It's not going to be treated exactly the same way as it is for adults, because only sensitive information of adults will be treated as sensitive. For children and minors, all of their information is considered sensitive and treated in that way.

Industry committee  It is at the very top of page 6. It reads, “Interpretation—minors”.

Industry committee  There are two columns. Column 1 is the organization and column 2 is a description.

Industry committee  Schedule 1 is a holdover from PIPEDA. It adds the World Anti-Doping Agency as being subject to the CPPA, as it is currently subject to PIPEDA.

Industry committee  The Department of Justice has advised us that this is a drafting convention. That is why they wanted the schedule to be named schedule 1. There's no policy reason. This is not related to any of the other government amendments. It's just a drafting convention.

Industry committee  No. It doesn't have anything to do with any other amendments.

Industry committee  No.